Making the Lover’s Leap: Wenonah, Rhetorical Colonialism, and Dissociative Memory(-)Work

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Rhetoric Society Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02773945.2023.2232761
Adam Gaffey
{"title":"Making the Lover’s Leap: Wenonah, Rhetorical Colonialism, and Dissociative Memory(-)Work","authors":"Adam Gaffey","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2023.2232761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis essay analyzes a display of Wenonah and the “Lover’s Leap” in Winona, Minnesota, as an example of dissociative memory(-)work. Applying dissociation to the organization of commemorative space, I attend to how the display uses markers of commemorative labor as modifying terms that invite audiences to dissociate investiture from the figure represented in order to privilege the people, actions, and temporal frameworks of those who made and maintained the memorial. This analysis proposes different dissociative units relevant to memory(-)work, including persona memorialized/persona memorializing, act memorialized/act of memorializing, and time memorialized/time of memorializing. Attention to this example of memory(-)work helps critics account for a unique and resilient form of rhetorical colonialism.KEYWORDS: Dissociationlover’s leapmemory(-)workrhetorical colonialismWenonah AcknowledgmentsThe author thanks the two anonymous reviewers, Jacqueline Rhodes, and Anna M. M. Gaffey for their insights toward improving this essay. This work also benefited from assistance and resources provided by the Winona County Historical Society and Winona State University Krueger Library.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":45453,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2023.2232761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis essay analyzes a display of Wenonah and the “Lover’s Leap” in Winona, Minnesota, as an example of dissociative memory(-)work. Applying dissociation to the organization of commemorative space, I attend to how the display uses markers of commemorative labor as modifying terms that invite audiences to dissociate investiture from the figure represented in order to privilege the people, actions, and temporal frameworks of those who made and maintained the memorial. This analysis proposes different dissociative units relevant to memory(-)work, including persona memorialized/persona memorializing, act memorialized/act of memorializing, and time memorialized/time of memorializing. Attention to this example of memory(-)work helps critics account for a unique and resilient form of rhetorical colonialism.KEYWORDS: Dissociationlover’s leapmemory(-)workrhetorical colonialismWenonah AcknowledgmentsThe author thanks the two anonymous reviewers, Jacqueline Rhodes, and Anna M. M. Gaffey for their insights toward improving this essay. This work also benefited from assistance and resources provided by the Winona County Historical Society and Winona State University Krueger Library.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情人之跃:文诺娜、修辞殖民主义与解离性记忆(-)作品
摘要本文以解离记忆(-)作品为例,分析了明尼苏达州威诺纳的“情人的飞跃”和“威诺纳”的展示。将分离运用到纪念空间的组织中,我关注展览如何使用纪念劳动的标记作为修饰术语,邀请观众将委托与所代表的人物分离开来,以赋予那些制作和维护纪念馆的人、行动和时间框架特权。这一分析提出了与记忆工作相关的不同解离单位,包括人物记忆/人物记忆、行为记忆/行为记忆和时间记忆/时间记忆。注意这个记忆(-)作品的例子有助于评论家解释一种独特而有弹性的修辞殖民主义形式。作者感谢两位匿名审稿人,杰奎琳·罗兹和安娜·m·m·加菲,他们对本文的改进提出了深刻的见解。这项工作也得益于威诺纳县历史学会和威诺纳州立大学克鲁格图书馆提供的帮助和资源。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
What Can a Body Do?: How We Meet the Built World Nestwork: New Material Rhetorics for Precarious Species Ambient Engineering: Hyper-Nudging, Hyper-Relevance, and Rhetorics of Nearness and Farness in a Post-AI Algorithmic World Conspiracy Theater of the Absurd: “Birds Aren’t Real” as Parodic Hypermimesis Rhetoric of/with AI: An Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1