Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Embolic Events: A Mini-Review

IF 1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Mind Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/hm.hm_52_22
George Bazoukis, Cheuk-To Chung, StamatisS Papadatos, Gary Tse
{"title":"Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Embolic Events: A Mini-Review","authors":"George Bazoukis, Cheuk-To Chung, StamatisS Papadatos, Gary Tse","doi":"10.4103/hm.hm_52_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is characterized by prominent ventricular trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. Patients with LVNC have an increased risk of embolic events. The presence of symptoms at the time of diagnosis can be a risk marker for stroke/embolic events. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as measured by transthoracic echocardiography and left atrial diameter, has been found to be a significant predictor of systemic embolism in LVNC patients. Furthermore, CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus and stroke or transient ischemic attack) and CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65–74 years and sex category [female]) scores were significantly higher in patients with stroke or embolism. Although the difference was not statistically significant, pediatric patients with LVNC combined with other congenital heart defects had more thromboembolic events compared to patients with isolated LVNC. On the other hand, stroke/transient ischemic attacks did not differ significantly between patients with isolated apical LVNC and mid-basal noncompaction. Furthermore, no differences in the prevalence of stroke between the quantiles of the maximal ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium have been revealed. Additionally, current data show no association between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and stroke/embolic events. Current evidence suggests anticoagulation treatment in LVNC patients with prior embolic events, atrial fibrillation, presence of left ventricular (LV) thrombus, and/or LV dysfunction. In patients with LVNC without a clear indication for anticoagulation, anticoagulant therapy may be considered in patients with CHADS2 score ≥2. More data are needed to identify patients at higher risk of embolic events who will be benefited from anticoagulation treatment.","PeriodicalId":34653,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Mind","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm_52_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is characterized by prominent ventricular trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. Patients with LVNC have an increased risk of embolic events. The presence of symptoms at the time of diagnosis can be a risk marker for stroke/embolic events. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as measured by transthoracic echocardiography and left atrial diameter, has been found to be a significant predictor of systemic embolism in LVNC patients. Furthermore, CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus and stroke or transient ischemic attack) and CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65–74 years and sex category [female]) scores were significantly higher in patients with stroke or embolism. Although the difference was not statistically significant, pediatric patients with LVNC combined with other congenital heart defects had more thromboembolic events compared to patients with isolated LVNC. On the other hand, stroke/transient ischemic attacks did not differ significantly between patients with isolated apical LVNC and mid-basal noncompaction. Furthermore, no differences in the prevalence of stroke between the quantiles of the maximal ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium have been revealed. Additionally, current data show no association between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and stroke/embolic events. Current evidence suggests anticoagulation treatment in LVNC patients with prior embolic events, atrial fibrillation, presence of left ventricular (LV) thrombus, and/or LV dysfunction. In patients with LVNC without a clear indication for anticoagulation, anticoagulant therapy may be considered in patients with CHADS2 score ≥2. More data are needed to identify patients at higher risk of embolic events who will be benefited from anticoagulation treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非压实性心肌病和栓塞事件:一个小型综述
左室非压实性心肌病(LVNC)的特点是突出的心室小梁和深小梁间窝。LVNC患者发生栓塞事件的风险增加。诊断时出现的症状可能是卒中/栓塞事件的危险标志。经胸超声心动图和左心房直径测量的左心室射血分数(LVEF)已被发现是LVNC患者全身性栓塞的重要预测因子。此外,CHADS2(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄≥75岁、糖尿病、卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作)和CHA2DS2-VASc(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄≥75岁、糖尿病、卒中、血管疾病、年龄65-74岁、性别类别[女性])评分在卒中或栓塞患者中显著升高。虽然差异无统计学意义,但与单纯LVNC患者相比,LVNC合并其他先天性心脏缺陷的儿童患者有更多的血栓栓塞事件。另一方面,卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作在孤立的根尖LVNC患者和中基底不致密患者之间没有显著差异。此外,未紧致心肌与紧致心肌最大比例的分位数之间卒中患病率没有差异。此外,目前的数据显示n端前b型利钠肽水平与卒中/栓塞事件之间没有关联。目前的证据表明,有栓塞事件、房颤、左室血栓和/或左室功能障碍的LVNC患者应接受抗凝治疗。对于无明确抗凝指征的LVNC患者,CHADS2评分≥2的患者可考虑抗凝治疗。需要更多的数据来确定栓塞事件风险较高的患者谁将从抗凝治疗中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Depression and Adverse Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: Cause or Consequence? New Insights and Clinical Practice on Heart, Brain, and Mind Enhancing Palliative Care for Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Scoping Review with Clinical Insights on the Integration of Physical Activity Adherent Right Atrial Cardiac Lipoma with Obstructive Symptoms: An Unusual Case Report Is Self-Reported Obstructive Sleep Apnea Associated with Cardiac Distress? A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1