In the Eye of the Transcriber: Four Column Analysis Structure for Qualitative Research With Audiovisual Data

IF 3.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Qualitative Methods Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/16094069231197332
Sarah S. Mohammed, Laura A. Knowles, Jorden A. Cummings
{"title":"In the Eye of the Transcriber: Four Column Analysis Structure for Qualitative Research With Audiovisual Data","authors":"Sarah S. Mohammed, Laura A. Knowles, Jorden A. Cummings","doi":"10.1177/16094069231197332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past thirty years, qualitative psychology researchers have focused on the study of written or spoken word while relegating the study of visual communications to children or those deemed unable to speak (Reavey, 2021, p. 2). Thus, the discipline now pays much attention to the collection and analysis of spoken or written words but significantly less to visual and auditory expressions of experience (Reavey, 2021, p. 3), and most transcription methods for psychology researchers are those designed for interviews that only capture the spoken word. However, these transcription methods have yet to account for the current context of ubiquitous, technologically mediated interactions. People from diverse groups use social media platforms such as YouTube and TikTok to interact using speech, audio and video. While they offer rich data for qualitative psychology researchers, the tools to capture such multimodal expressions are still in early stages of development within the discipline (Marshall et al., 2021). In this article, we present a transcription structure that allows for the recording of both speech and visual elements in audiovisual content. Inspired by methods from communications and visual anthropology, the Four Column Analysis Structure (or, FoCAS) allows for the simultaneous analysis of both audio and visual data by allowing for the transcription of four dimensions: (1) timestamp, (2) setting, (3) scene, and (4) audio. Based on its application in two completed studies and one study in progress, we describe the development of the FoCAS, how to set it up, transcription conventions, and how to analyze qualitative data using all four columns. We additionally discuss sampling considerations and the advantages and disadvantages of the structure. By expanding the amount of meaningful data that can be captured by qualitative transcription, we hope the FoCAS can be used to create more multidimensional, rigorous analyses of audiovisual data.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231197332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the past thirty years, qualitative psychology researchers have focused on the study of written or spoken word while relegating the study of visual communications to children or those deemed unable to speak (Reavey, 2021, p. 2). Thus, the discipline now pays much attention to the collection and analysis of spoken or written words but significantly less to visual and auditory expressions of experience (Reavey, 2021, p. 3), and most transcription methods for psychology researchers are those designed for interviews that only capture the spoken word. However, these transcription methods have yet to account for the current context of ubiquitous, technologically mediated interactions. People from diverse groups use social media platforms such as YouTube and TikTok to interact using speech, audio and video. While they offer rich data for qualitative psychology researchers, the tools to capture such multimodal expressions are still in early stages of development within the discipline (Marshall et al., 2021). In this article, we present a transcription structure that allows for the recording of both speech and visual elements in audiovisual content. Inspired by methods from communications and visual anthropology, the Four Column Analysis Structure (or, FoCAS) allows for the simultaneous analysis of both audio and visual data by allowing for the transcription of four dimensions: (1) timestamp, (2) setting, (3) scene, and (4) audio. Based on its application in two completed studies and one study in progress, we describe the development of the FoCAS, how to set it up, transcription conventions, and how to analyze qualitative data using all four columns. We additionally discuss sampling considerations and the advantages and disadvantages of the structure. By expanding the amount of meaningful data that can be captured by qualitative transcription, we hope the FoCAS can be used to create more multidimensional, rigorous analyses of audiovisual data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转录者眼中:视听资料定性研究的四列分析结构
在过去的三十年里,定性心理学研究人员一直专注于书面或口头语言的研究,而将视觉交流的研究归为儿童或被认为无法说话的人(Reavey, 2021,第2页)。因此,该学科现在非常关注口头或书面语言的收集和分析,但对经验的视觉和听觉表达的关注明显减少(Reavey, 2021,第3页)。心理学研究人员的大多数转录方法都是为那些只捕捉口语的访谈而设计的。然而,这些转录方法还没有考虑到当前无处不在的、技术介导的相互作用的背景。来自不同群体的人们使用YouTube和TikTok等社交媒体平台,通过语音、音频和视频进行互动。虽然它们为定性心理学研究人员提供了丰富的数据,但捕捉这种多模态表达的工具仍处于该学科的早期发展阶段(Marshall et al., 2021)。在本文中,我们提出了一种转录结构,允许在视听内容中记录语音和视觉元素。受通信和视觉人类学方法的启发,四柱分析结构(或FoCAS)允许同时分析音频和视觉数据,允许四个维度的转录:(1)时间戳,(2)设置,(3)场景和(4)音频。基于其在两项已完成的研究和一项正在进行的研究中的应用,我们描述了FoCAS的发展,如何建立它,转录惯例,以及如何使用所有四列分析定性数据。我们还讨论了采样的考虑和结构的优缺点。通过扩大定性转录可以捕获的有意义数据的数量,我们希望FoCAS可以用于创建更多维、更严格的视听数据分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
期刊最新文献
Applying Realist Retroduction to EHR-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool Development. Which Quotations to Use?: Guidance on Selecting and Reporting Quotations in Qualitative Research. "We Have a Ways to Go, but I Think You've Taken the Steps to Get Us There": Engaging Community Partners in Qualitative Analysis Using the RADaR Technique. Risk Environments of Permanent Supportive Housing for Formerly Incarcerated People with Serious Mental Illnesses: A Protocol for a Novel Mixed Methods Feasibility Study. Updating and Advancing Member-Checking Methods: Use of Video and Asynchronous Technology to Optimize Participant Engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1