Genetic variability, correlation and cluster analysis of sub-tropical maize inbreds for morphological characteristics and kernel micronutrient contents
Pitambara ., Y.M. Shukla, Brijesh K. Mehta, D.J. Parmar
{"title":"Genetic variability, correlation and cluster analysis of sub-tropical maize inbreds for morphological characteristics and kernel micronutrient contents","authors":"Pitambara ., Y.M. Shukla, Brijesh K. Mehta, D.J. Parmar","doi":"10.59515/rma.2023.v44.i1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, forty eight sub-tropical maize inbreds were analyzed for grain yield and yield attributing traits along with micronutrients content. Genotypic differences were significant among the maize inbreds for all the traits under study. Kernel Fe concentration ranged from 14.23 to 38.08 mg/kg, while kernel Zn concentration varied from 11.61 to 39.41 mg/kg. Kernel copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn) content ranged from 1.34 to 4.31 mg/kg and 2.05 to 9.83 mg/kg, respectively. Significant positive correlation was observed among the kernel Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn, indicating the possibility of their simultaneous improvement. For kernel Fe concentration, GWL28 (38.08 mg/kg) and CML296 (33.78 mg/kg) were found to be the best genotypes. In case of Zn content, GWL28 (39.41 mg/kg) and GYL10 (35.41 mg/kg) were the best inbreds. Genetic diversity based on all the four micronutrients grouped 48 inbreds into five major clusters. The highest genetic dissimilarity was observed between CM133 and CML251, while CML251 and CML293 showed the lowest dissimilarity. Rank summation index identified CML296, GYL1 and CML269 as first three best inbreds for kernel micronutrients content and grain yield. The promising inbreds identified here would be useful for developing biofortified maize hybrids enriched with micronutrients","PeriodicalId":49636,"journal":{"name":"Range Management and Agroforestry","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Range Management and Agroforestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59515/rma.2023.v44.i1.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present study, forty eight sub-tropical maize inbreds were analyzed for grain yield and yield attributing traits along with micronutrients content. Genotypic differences were significant among the maize inbreds for all the traits under study. Kernel Fe concentration ranged from 14.23 to 38.08 mg/kg, while kernel Zn concentration varied from 11.61 to 39.41 mg/kg. Kernel copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn) content ranged from 1.34 to 4.31 mg/kg and 2.05 to 9.83 mg/kg, respectively. Significant positive correlation was observed among the kernel Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn, indicating the possibility of their simultaneous improvement. For kernel Fe concentration, GWL28 (38.08 mg/kg) and CML296 (33.78 mg/kg) were found to be the best genotypes. In case of Zn content, GWL28 (39.41 mg/kg) and GYL10 (35.41 mg/kg) were the best inbreds. Genetic diversity based on all the four micronutrients grouped 48 inbreds into five major clusters. The highest genetic dissimilarity was observed between CM133 and CML251, while CML251 and CML293 showed the lowest dissimilarity. Rank summation index identified CML296, GYL1 and CML269 as first three best inbreds for kernel micronutrients content and grain yield. The promising inbreds identified here would be useful for developing biofortified maize hybrids enriched with micronutrients
期刊介绍:
The Society has been established with the following objectives:
1. To advance the cause of research activity in all aspects of rangelands and to encourage and promote the studies on rangeland, wasteland ecosystems and agroforestry.
2. To provide facilities for seminars and conferences to rangeland researchers, development workers and farmers and to encourage close cooperation with organizations having related aims and interests.
3. To disseminate the knowledge of scientific agriculture and technology for forage and rangeland production, improvement and management.