Three absolute barriers of digital technologies implementation in medicine.

I.A. Shaderkin
{"title":"Three absolute barriers of digital technologies implementation in medicine.","authors":"I.A. Shaderkin","doi":"10.29188/2712-9217-2023-9-2-40-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technologies that are used in medicine cannot be applied in practice in isolation from the basic issues that underlie the health system. In this article the author describes three basic, fundamental barriers to the development of digital technologies in medicine and their implementation in clinical practice: 1. Financial barrier. 2. Personnel barrier. 3. Lack of absolute knowledge in medicine. According to the author, these barriers are basic because they cannot be overcome at the present stage without general development of society. Digital technologies require funding - this must be accepted and considered when implementing them. If technologies require financing, then their introduction into a healthcare system, where there is no excess of financing, can lead to DT competition with other technologies and healthcare items of expenditure. Regarding the personnel barrier, it is worth highlighting two important components: the need to increase the number of specialists and the need to have specialists with a certain set of knowledge and competencies. This paper analyzes several ways of solving this barrier, such as using artificial intelligence, a personal medical assistant. Significant financial costs, the need to exclude subjective assessment, complex principles for obtaining evidence-based knowledge, the variety of subject areas studied in medicine make it difficult to quickly obtain reliable information about human health. This is the third of the limiting barriers to the introduction of digital technologies in medicine. For a wider introduction of digital technologies in medicine, the efforts of scientists, developers, healthcare organizers, and decision makers should be directed to overcome these barriers.","PeriodicalId":496416,"journal":{"name":"Российский журнал телемедицины и электронного здравоохранения","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Российский журнал телемедицины и электронного здравоохранения","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2023-9-2-40-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technologies that are used in medicine cannot be applied in practice in isolation from the basic issues that underlie the health system. In this article the author describes three basic, fundamental barriers to the development of digital technologies in medicine and their implementation in clinical practice: 1. Financial barrier. 2. Personnel barrier. 3. Lack of absolute knowledge in medicine. According to the author, these barriers are basic because they cannot be overcome at the present stage without general development of society. Digital technologies require funding - this must be accepted and considered when implementing them. If technologies require financing, then their introduction into a healthcare system, where there is no excess of financing, can lead to DT competition with other technologies and healthcare items of expenditure. Regarding the personnel barrier, it is worth highlighting two important components: the need to increase the number of specialists and the need to have specialists with a certain set of knowledge and competencies. This paper analyzes several ways of solving this barrier, such as using artificial intelligence, a personal medical assistant. Significant financial costs, the need to exclude subjective assessment, complex principles for obtaining evidence-based knowledge, the variety of subject areas studied in medicine make it difficult to quickly obtain reliable information about human health. This is the third of the limiting barriers to the introduction of digital technologies in medicine. For a wider introduction of digital technologies in medicine, the efforts of scientists, developers, healthcare organizers, and decision makers should be directed to overcome these barriers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字技术在医学领域应用的三大绝对障碍。
医学上使用的技术不能脱离构成卫生系统基础的基本问题而在实践中加以应用。在这篇文章中,作者描述了医学中数字技术发展及其在临床实践中实施的三个基本障碍:1。金融障碍。2. 人员的障碍。3.缺乏绝对的医学知识。作者认为,这些障碍是基本的,因为在现阶段,如果没有社会的普遍发展,这些障碍是无法克服的。数字技术需要资金——在实施数字技术时必须接受并考虑到这一点。如果技术需要融资,那么将其引入没有过多融资的医疗保健系统,可能导致DT与其他技术和医疗保健支出项目竞争。关于人员障碍,有两个重要组成部分值得强调:需要增加专家的人数和需要拥有具有某种知识和能力的专家。本文分析了解决这一障碍的几种方法,如使用人工智能、个人医疗助理等。巨大的财务成本、排除主观评价的需要、获得循证知识的复杂原则、医学研究的学科领域的多样性,使迅速获得有关人类健康的可靠信息变得困难。这是在医学中引入数字技术的第三个限制障碍。为了在医学中更广泛地引入数字技术,科学家、开发人员、医疗保健组织者和决策者应该努力克服这些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Remote telemedicine technologies in pediatric neurology. China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers. Three absolute barriers of digital technologies implementation in medicine. Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education. The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1