{"title":"Rewriting the Past for the Changing Present: The Need for New and Pluriversal Histories of Archaeology","authors":"Oscar Moro Abadía","doi":"10.5334/bha-675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the publication of the second edition of Bruce G. Trigger’s A History of Archaeological Thought in 2006, scholars have produced a negligible number of histories of archaeology. This scarcity contrasts with the considerable amount of historical works on more regionally- and temporally-restricted contexts. With reference to the English-speaking literature, I suggest in this paper that there is a pressing need for new and pluriversal histories of archaeology that connect past and present. Since the turn of the twenty-first century, archaeology has gone through an intense transformation. For instance, during the past twenty years, archaeologists have been concerned with a number of ethical issues, have extensively collaborated with different kind of communities (especially Indigenous), and have reformulated the relationship between theory and practice. It is not only that historians need to incorporate these (and other) developments into our disciplinary history, they also need to rewrite that history with reference to our changing present.","PeriodicalId":41664,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the publication of the second edition of Bruce G. Trigger’s A History of Archaeological Thought in 2006, scholars have produced a negligible number of histories of archaeology. This scarcity contrasts with the considerable amount of historical works on more regionally- and temporally-restricted contexts. With reference to the English-speaking literature, I suggest in this paper that there is a pressing need for new and pluriversal histories of archaeology that connect past and present. Since the turn of the twenty-first century, archaeology has gone through an intense transformation. For instance, during the past twenty years, archaeologists have been concerned with a number of ethical issues, have extensively collaborated with different kind of communities (especially Indigenous), and have reformulated the relationship between theory and practice. It is not only that historians need to incorporate these (and other) developments into our disciplinary history, they also need to rewrite that history with reference to our changing present.
自2006年布鲁斯·g·特里格的《考古思想史》(A History of Archaeological Thought)第二版出版以来,学者们创作的考古思想史几乎可以忽略不计。与这种稀缺性形成鲜明对比的是,有相当数量的历史著作受到更多地区和时间的限制。参考英语文献,我在本文中建议,迫切需要一种新的、多元的考古学历史,将过去和现在联系起来。自21世纪初以来,考古学经历了一场激烈的变革。例如,在过去的二十年中,考古学家一直关注许多伦理问题,与不同类型的社区(特别是土著社区)进行了广泛的合作,并重新制定了理论与实践之间的关系。历史学家不仅需要将这些(和其他)发展纳入我们的学科历史,他们还需要根据我们不断变化的现状重写历史。