GUSTATORY, OLFACTORY, TACTILE MODALITIES IN CONNOISSEURIAL FOOD REVIEWS

IF 0.4 3区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS STUDIA LINGUISTICA Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17721/studling2023.22.9-22
Alla Belova
{"title":"GUSTATORY, OLFACTORY, TACTILE MODALITIES IN CONNOISSEURIAL FOOD REVIEWS","authors":"Alla Belova","doi":"10.17721/studling2023.22.9-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sensorial experience has always been of paramount importance for humans, their survival, and world cognition. The rise of Sensory/ Sensorial/ Sensitive Linguistics in the 21st century, interest in multimodality, and digital technologies advance triggered computerized research of gustatory, olfactory, and tactile perception as well as diverse experiments in Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistics, Cognitive Linguistics. 500 connoisseurial food reviews written by prominent restaurant critics in Great Britain and the United States of America in 2020-2023 were analyzed to find out textual ways of communicating taste. The article analyzes language means used to package taste perception, focusing on gustatory, olfactory, and tactile modalities in Modern English, the intersection of gustation and olfaction, in particular, sensory lexemes across categories. Word frequency and combinability of basic taste terms, gustatory words, and non-taste-related words were analyzed to describe taste types and flavour degrees. Food reviews reveal the dominance of veridical tastes, not generic taste types. Tactile modality is expressed in food reviews in multiple ways, proving that the meal’s texture and some ingredients are one of the essential parameters of the meal evaluation. Visual modality is realized through numerous photos of the dishes and restaurants accompanying reviews. Auditory modality in food reviews is reduced to a couple of adjectives and their derivatives. The research is done within Culinary Linguistics deals with diverse genres of food writing, Sensitive Linguistics that focuses on perceptual modalities, Multimodality Theory as eating and food tasting are viewed as multisensory experience and Cognitive Linguistics, in particular, categorization of sensual perceptions.","PeriodicalId":46179,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA LINGUISTICA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIA LINGUISTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/studling2023.22.9-22","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensorial experience has always been of paramount importance for humans, their survival, and world cognition. The rise of Sensory/ Sensorial/ Sensitive Linguistics in the 21st century, interest in multimodality, and digital technologies advance triggered computerized research of gustatory, olfactory, and tactile perception as well as diverse experiments in Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistics, Cognitive Linguistics. 500 connoisseurial food reviews written by prominent restaurant critics in Great Britain and the United States of America in 2020-2023 were analyzed to find out textual ways of communicating taste. The article analyzes language means used to package taste perception, focusing on gustatory, olfactory, and tactile modalities in Modern English, the intersection of gustation and olfaction, in particular, sensory lexemes across categories. Word frequency and combinability of basic taste terms, gustatory words, and non-taste-related words were analyzed to describe taste types and flavour degrees. Food reviews reveal the dominance of veridical tastes, not generic taste types. Tactile modality is expressed in food reviews in multiple ways, proving that the meal’s texture and some ingredients are one of the essential parameters of the meal evaluation. Visual modality is realized through numerous photos of the dishes and restaurants accompanying reviews. Auditory modality in food reviews is reduced to a couple of adjectives and their derivatives. The research is done within Culinary Linguistics deals with diverse genres of food writing, Sensitive Linguistics that focuses on perceptual modalities, Multimodality Theory as eating and food tasting are viewed as multisensory experience and Cognitive Linguistics, in particular, categorization of sensual perceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
味觉,嗅觉,触觉模式在鉴赏性食物评论
感官体验对于人类的生存和对世界的认知一直都是至关重要的。21世纪,感觉/感觉/敏感语言学的兴起,对多模态的兴趣,以及数字技术的进步,引发了味觉、嗅觉和触觉感知的计算机化研究,以及心理语言学、神经语言学、认知语言学:对2020-2023年英国和美国著名餐厅评论家撰写的500篇鉴赏性美食评论进行分析,找出传达味道的文本方式。本文分析了包装味觉感知的语言手段,重点分析了现代英语中味觉、嗅觉和触觉的方式,味觉和嗅觉的交集,特别是跨类别的感官词汇。分析了基本味觉词、味觉词和非味觉词描述味觉类型和风味程度的词频和组合。食物评论揭示了真实口味的主导地位,而不是一般的口味类型。触觉形态在食物评价中表现为多种形式,证明了食物的质地和某些食材是食物评价的重要参数之一。视觉形式是通过大量的菜肴和餐馆的照片来实现的。食物评论中的听觉情态被简化为几个形容词及其衍生词。该研究在烹饪语言学中进行,涉及不同类型的食物写作,敏感语言学侧重于感知模式,多模态理论(饮食和食物品尝被视为多感官体验)和认知语言学,特别是感官感知的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIA LINGUISTICA
STUDIA LINGUISTICA LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Studia Linguistica is committed to the publication of high quality, original papers and provides an international forum for the discussion of theoretical linguistic research, primarily within the fields of grammar, cognitive semantics and language typology. The principal aim is to open a channel of communication between researchers operating in traditionally diverse fields while continuing to focus on natural language data.
期刊最新文献
THEORETICAL A‐GRAMMATISM: THE CASE FOR AN ELIMINATIVIST MINIMALISM Verb‐echo answers in Japanese do not call for syntactic head movement: Arguments for a pragmatic account* Bottom Copy Pronunciation in Japanese Passives Syntactic Variations in Referential Metonymy On the scalarity of nu‐V constructions in Taiwan Mandarin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1