Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Fired Cement Lateritic Brick

Rasheed Abdulwahab, Glory O. Akinwamide, Mukaila Abiola Anifowose, Samson Olalekan Odeyemi
{"title":"Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Fired Cement Lateritic Brick","authors":"Rasheed Abdulwahab, Glory O. Akinwamide, Mukaila Abiola Anifowose, Samson Olalekan Odeyemi","doi":"10.4028/p-4qcuju","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction industry is really concerned with producing better and durable building materials. Hence, the high cost of conventional building materials have resulted into use of locally available materials. This study assess the effect of varying cement content on engineering properties of fired lateritic bricks. The lateritic soil samples were stabilized with cement at 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7 and 7.5%, cast in moulds and later fired for 8 hours at a 1000°C. Index properties (natural moisture content, specific gravity, particle size distribution and atterberg limit tests) were determined on the natural lateritic soil. While compressive strength, water absorption, abrasion and impact value test were determined on the cement fired bricks. The lateritic soil in its natural form were classified as A-6 and clay of high compressibility in accordance to ASTM D-3282. The results of the index properties are within acceptable limits for lateritic soil. The effect of varying cement content on the mechanical properties showed that the compressive strength of the bricks increases from 4.0 N/mm 2 at control (un-stabilized brick) to 7.3 N/mm 2 at 5% soil stabilization with cement. However, significant reductions in value was witnessed in the water absorption, abrasion and impact value results between the un-stabilized brick (control) and 5% cement fired bricks. The study concluded that fired bricks stabilized with 5% cement was found to be the best and most suitable for load and non-load bearing walls.","PeriodicalId":34329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-4qcuju","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry is really concerned with producing better and durable building materials. Hence, the high cost of conventional building materials have resulted into use of locally available materials. This study assess the effect of varying cement content on engineering properties of fired lateritic bricks. The lateritic soil samples were stabilized with cement at 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7 and 7.5%, cast in moulds and later fired for 8 hours at a 1000°C. Index properties (natural moisture content, specific gravity, particle size distribution and atterberg limit tests) were determined on the natural lateritic soil. While compressive strength, water absorption, abrasion and impact value test were determined on the cement fired bricks. The lateritic soil in its natural form were classified as A-6 and clay of high compressibility in accordance to ASTM D-3282. The results of the index properties are within acceptable limits for lateritic soil. The effect of varying cement content on the mechanical properties showed that the compressive strength of the bricks increases from 4.0 N/mm 2 at control (un-stabilized brick) to 7.3 N/mm 2 at 5% soil stabilization with cement. However, significant reductions in value was witnessed in the water absorption, abrasion and impact value results between the un-stabilized brick (control) and 5% cement fired bricks. The study concluded that fired bricks stabilized with 5% cement was found to be the best and most suitable for load and non-load bearing walls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煅烧水泥红土砖的工程性能评价
建筑业真正关心的是生产更好、更耐用的建筑材料。因此,传统建筑材料的高成本导致使用当地可用的材料。研究了不同水泥掺量对烧制红土砖工程性能的影响。红土样品分别用3、3.5、4、4.5、5、5.5、6、6.5、7和7.5%的水泥稳定,浇铸在模具中,然后在1000℃下烧制8小时。测定了天然红土的各项指标性质(天然含水率、比重、粒径分布和阿特伯格极限试验)。同时对水泥烧结砖进行了抗压强度、吸水率、耐磨性和冲击值试验。按照ASTM D-3282标准,红土在其自然形态下被分类为A-6和高压缩性粘土。指标性质的结果在红土的可接受范围内。不同水泥掺量对力学性能的影响表明,砖的抗压强度从对照(未稳定砖)的4.0 N/mm 2增加到5%水泥土稳定化时的7.3 N/mm 2。然而,在不稳定砖(对照)和5%水泥烧结砖之间,吸水率、磨损率和冲击值显著降低。研究结果表明,5%水泥稳定的烧结砖最适合于承重和非承重墙体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Designing a Roundabout to Overcome Traffic Congestion at a Four-Armed Intersection Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Fired Cement Lateritic Brick Molecular Dynamics Simulation on Shocked Nanocrystalline Aluminum Experimental Investigation on Axial Ultrasonic Vibration Assisted Milling of Cr12MoV Enhancing Cable Gland Design Efficiency through TRIZ-Driven Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1