Comparative Study on Biochemical Effects of Natural and Synthetic Pesticides on Preserved Phaseolus lunatus in Male Albino Rats

Chibuzor Caroline Nweze, Titilayo Oluwayemisi Bamidele, Bawa Yusuf Muhammad, Bisola Lateefat Adedipe, Wandoo Tseaa, Eneh William Nebechukwu, Rahima Yunusa, Happy Abimiku Manasseh
{"title":"Comparative Study on Biochemical Effects of Natural and Synthetic Pesticides on Preserved Phaseolus lunatus in Male Albino Rats","authors":"Chibuzor Caroline Nweze, Titilayo Oluwayemisi Bamidele, Bawa Yusuf Muhammad, Bisola Lateefat Adedipe, Wandoo Tseaa, Eneh William Nebechukwu, Rahima Yunusa, Happy Abimiku Manasseh","doi":"10.24018/ejbio.2023.4.4.465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legume Phaseolus lunatus production is hindered by pest infestation which may have reduced its quality and quantity. To this effect, pesticides come into play to kill these pests. The purpose of the study was to determine how various preservatives affected the biochemistry of male albino rats. Exactly 36 male albino rats of 200-250 g were grouped into six. They were fed with a dietary intervention for 8 weeks with 4 different methods of selected preserved diets. The groups are Group 1 (normal control) was rats administered only feed and water. Group 2 (blank) was rats administered only Phaseolus lunatus without preservative. Group 3 was rats administered feeds + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with aluminium phosphide. Group 4 was rats administered feeds + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with pepper. Group 5 was rats administered feed + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with dichlorvos. Group 6 was rats administered feed + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with wood ash. The result showed significant increase in AST and ALT of lima beans preserved with pepper (23.67±2.47c) (15.38±1.55a) P<0.01 and ash (34.51 2.04d) (15.12±3.10a) P<0.001, respectively. When albino rats were given beans preserved in ash, their CRP levels increased noticeably P<0.05 (69.94±1.64b) (62.97±5.30a). PCV and platelet levels in albino rats given lima beans preserved with ash significantly decreased P< 0.01 (39.00±1.00c) (49.92±5.48a) and P<0.001 (95.54±3.45d) (213.31±32.31a), respectively. The majority of renal function metrics show considerable increases. In conclusion, the study revealed the alteration in the biochemical parameters of the albino rats after consumption of the preserved beans, this may indicate cellular damage.","PeriodicalId":72969,"journal":{"name":"European journal of biology and biotechnology","volume":"42 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of biology and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2023.4.4.465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legume Phaseolus lunatus production is hindered by pest infestation which may have reduced its quality and quantity. To this effect, pesticides come into play to kill these pests. The purpose of the study was to determine how various preservatives affected the biochemistry of male albino rats. Exactly 36 male albino rats of 200-250 g were grouped into six. They were fed with a dietary intervention for 8 weeks with 4 different methods of selected preserved diets. The groups are Group 1 (normal control) was rats administered only feed and water. Group 2 (blank) was rats administered only Phaseolus lunatus without preservative. Group 3 was rats administered feeds + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with aluminium phosphide. Group 4 was rats administered feeds + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with pepper. Group 5 was rats administered feed + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with dichlorvos. Group 6 was rats administered feed + Phaseolus lunatus preserved with wood ash. The result showed significant increase in AST and ALT of lima beans preserved with pepper (23.67±2.47c) (15.38±1.55a) P<0.01 and ash (34.51 2.04d) (15.12±3.10a) P<0.001, respectively. When albino rats were given beans preserved in ash, their CRP levels increased noticeably P<0.05 (69.94±1.64b) (62.97±5.30a). PCV and platelet levels in albino rats given lima beans preserved with ash significantly decreased P< 0.01 (39.00±1.00c) (49.92±5.48a) and P<0.001 (95.54±3.45d) (213.31±32.31a), respectively. The majority of renal function metrics show considerable increases. In conclusion, the study revealed the alteration in the biochemical parameters of the albino rats after consumption of the preserved beans, this may indicate cellular damage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然农药与合成农药对雄性白化大鼠月菜保鲜生物化学影响的比较研究
豆科植物菜豆的生产受到病虫害的影响,其质量和数量可能下降。为此,杀虫剂开始发挥作用来杀死这些害虫。本研究的目的是确定各种防腐剂如何影响雄性白化大鼠的生物化学。选取200 ~ 250 g雄性白化大鼠36只,每组6只。采用4种不同的腌制方法,进行为期8周的饮食干预。1组为正常对照组,只喂饲料和水。第2组(空白)只给药,不加防腐剂。第三组大鼠饲喂饲料+磷化铝保存月相。第4组大鼠饲喂饲料+辣椒腌制月相菜。第5组大鼠饲喂饲料+敌敌畏保存月相。第6组大鼠饲喂饲料+木灰保存月菜。结果表明:青豆经胡椒腌制后,AST和ALT分别显著升高(23.67±2.47c)(15.38±1.55a) P<0.01,灰分腌制后AST和ALT分别升高(34.51±2.4d)(15.12±3.10a) P<0.001。白化大鼠给予白蜡保存的豆子后,CRP水平显著升高(p < 0.05(69.94±1.64b)(62.97±5.30a))。白化大鼠给予灰分青豆后PCV和血小板水平显著降低;0.01(39.00±1.00c)(49.92±5.48a)和P<0.001(95.54±3.45d)(213.31±32.31a)。大多数肾功能指标显示明显增高。综上所述,本研究揭示了食用豆豉后白化大鼠生化参数的变化,这可能表明细胞损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Jatropha curcas Accessions Control of Photoinhibition and Photoprotective Mechanisms in Senescing Leaves in a Semi-Arid Region Botswana Point-of-Care Molecular Testing with tinto rangTM: A Food Grade Safe Fluorophore for Colorimetric LAMP Assays at Low Resource Settings New Species of Preussia from Sedimentary Cost in Basrah Province, Iraq Sexual Dimorphism of Elastic Fibers in Prenatal Lung Mice Microbial Biotechnology: A Key Tool for Addressing Climate Change and Food Insecurity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1