Examining the Implications of Negativity Perceptions for Enterprise Social Media Use

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Media Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1080/15213269.2023.2269835
Ward van Zoonen, Anu E. Sivunen, Jeffrey W. Treem
{"title":"Examining the Implications of Negativity Perceptions for Enterprise Social Media Use","authors":"Ward van Zoonen, Anu E. Sivunen, Jeffrey W. Treem","doi":"10.1080/15213269.2023.2269835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many organizations fail to optimally benefit from voluntary communication and collaboration tools – e.g. enterprise social media (ESM) – where use depends on workers’ discretionary behaviors. This study explores how ESM use is informed by employees’ perceptions of the content these media convey. Specifically, this paper reports on a survey study (N = 619) to examine the relationship between negativity perceptions and ESM use, through pro-sharing norms and knowledge-sharing intentions. The findings indicate that negativity perceptions of online communication are met with avoidance responses by organizational members and are associated with low platform usage. This relationship is partially mediated by pro-sharing norms and knowledge-sharing intentions, such that negativity perceptions undermine pro-sharing norms and lower knowledge-sharing intention, ultimately reducing ESM use. The findings highlight a potential difference in the underlying psychological mechanisms related to negative media content in organizational environments compared to public and mass media environments. This study integrates media selection literature and media psychology perspectives to study technology adoption and expands our understanding of the potential barriers and drivers of platform use in organizational contexts.","PeriodicalId":47932,"journal":{"name":"Media Psychology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.2269835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many organizations fail to optimally benefit from voluntary communication and collaboration tools – e.g. enterprise social media (ESM) – where use depends on workers’ discretionary behaviors. This study explores how ESM use is informed by employees’ perceptions of the content these media convey. Specifically, this paper reports on a survey study (N = 619) to examine the relationship between negativity perceptions and ESM use, through pro-sharing norms and knowledge-sharing intentions. The findings indicate that negativity perceptions of online communication are met with avoidance responses by organizational members and are associated with low platform usage. This relationship is partially mediated by pro-sharing norms and knowledge-sharing intentions, such that negativity perceptions undermine pro-sharing norms and lower knowledge-sharing intention, ultimately reducing ESM use. The findings highlight a potential difference in the underlying psychological mechanisms related to negative media content in organizational environments compared to public and mass media environments. This study integrates media selection literature and media psychology perspectives to study technology adoption and expands our understanding of the potential barriers and drivers of platform use in organizational contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究负面认知对企业社交媒体使用的影响
许多组织未能从自愿沟通和协作工具中获得最佳收益,例如企业社交媒体(ESM),其使用取决于员工的自由裁量行为。本研究探讨了员工对这些媒体传达的内容的看法如何影响ESM的使用。具体而言,本文报告了一项调查研究(N = 619),通过亲共享规范和知识共享意图来检验消极认知与ESM使用之间的关系。研究结果表明,组织成员对在线交流的消极看法与回避反应相一致,并且与平台使用率低有关。这种关系在一定程度上受亲分享规范和知识分享意愿的中介作用,因此,消极认知会破坏亲分享规范和降低知识分享意愿,最终减少ESM的使用。研究结果强调,与公共和大众媒体环境相比,组织环境中与负面媒体内容相关的潜在心理机制存在潜在差异。本研究结合媒介选择文献和媒介心理学的观点来研究技术采用,并扩展了我们对组织环境中平台使用的潜在障碍和驱动因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Media Psychology
Media Psychology Multiple-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Media Psychology is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to publishing theoretically-oriented empirical research that is at the intersection of psychology and media communication. These topics include media uses, processes, and effects. Such research is already well represented in mainstream journals in psychology and communication, but its publication is dispersed across many sources. Therefore, scholars working on common issues and problems in various disciplines often cannot fully utilize the contributions of kindred spirits in cognate disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Media Multitasking in Younger and Older Adults: Associations with Cognitive Abilities and Biological Stress Responses ‘You Got My Back?’ Severity and Counter-Speech in Online Hate Speech Toward Minority Groups From Sexualized Media Consumption to Salary Negotiation: The Relation Between Chronic Self-Objectification Processes and Women’s Negotiation Intentions Creativity, Expectancy Violations, and Impression Formation: Effects of Novelty and Appropriateness in Online Dating Profile Texts Wise Beyond Their Years: Testing the Mediated Wisdom of Experience Framework with Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1