Revitalizing double‐loop learning in organizational contexts: A systematic review and research agenda

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT European Management Review Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1111/emre.12615
Mercedes Victoria Caceres Auqui, Andrea Furlan
{"title":"Revitalizing double‐loop learning in organizational contexts: A systematic review and research agenda","authors":"Mercedes Victoria Caceres Auqui, Andrea Furlan","doi":"10.1111/emre.12615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Argyris & Schön's notion of two types of learning, single‐loop (SLL) and double‐loop learning (DLL), is arguably one of the most popularized categorizations of organizational learning (OL). However, while the concept of DLL is widely cited, it has left a superficial impact on the literature and practice. We argue that the limited impact of DLL is due to two features of DLL: the complexity of its definition and the difficulty in its implementation. This study identifies and organizes critical insights in the literature related to the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of DLL. To address these topics, we review and synthesize the findings of 128 studies on DLL published between 1974 and 2021. We aim to reduce the confusion surrounding DLL and the proliferation of empirical studies on DLL that ignore its original notion. We propose a framework that makes explicit the misconceptions, wrong assumptions, and barriers in conceptualizing, measuring, and generating DLL, and it also provides insights into how to overcome these limitations and serves as a platform for future research on DLL.","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Argyris & Schön's notion of two types of learning, single‐loop (SLL) and double‐loop learning (DLL), is arguably one of the most popularized categorizations of organizational learning (OL). However, while the concept of DLL is widely cited, it has left a superficial impact on the literature and practice. We argue that the limited impact of DLL is due to two features of DLL: the complexity of its definition and the difficulty in its implementation. This study identifies and organizes critical insights in the literature related to the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of DLL. To address these topics, we review and synthesize the findings of 128 studies on DLL published between 1974 and 2021. We aim to reduce the confusion surrounding DLL and the proliferation of empirical studies on DLL that ignore its original notion. We propose a framework that makes explicit the misconceptions, wrong assumptions, and barriers in conceptualizing, measuring, and generating DLL, and it also provides insights into how to overcome these limitations and serves as a platform for future research on DLL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在组织环境中振兴双循环学习:系统回顾和研究议程
【摘要】银尾草;Schön关于两种学习类型的概念,单环(SLL)和双环学习(DLL),可以说是组织学习(OL)中最流行的分类之一。然而,虽然DLL的概念被广泛引用,但它对文献和实践留下了表面的影响。我们认为,DLL的影响有限是由于DLL的两个特点:定义的复杂性和实现的难度。本研究确定并组织了与DLL的概念化、度量和生成相关的文献中的重要见解。为了解决这些问题,我们回顾和综合了1974年至2021年间发表的128篇关于动态DLL的研究结果。我们的目标是减少围绕DLL的混乱和对DLL的实证研究的扩散,这些研究忽视了它的原始概念。我们提出了一个框架,明确了在概念化、测量和生成DLL中的误解、错误假设和障碍,并提供了如何克服这些限制的见解,并为DLL的未来研究提供了一个平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Management Review is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of management in private and public sector organizations through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. The European Management Review provides an international forum for dialogue between researchers, thereby improving the understanding of the nature of management in different settings and promoting the transfer of research results to management practice. Although one of the European Management Review"s aims is to foster the general advancement of management scholarship among European scholars and/or those academics interested in European management issues.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acceptable finger pointing: How evaluators judge the ethicality of blame shifting Human resource management in the emerging work ecosystem: Propositions for scholarship and implications for practice The effect of restructuring internationalized companies on performance: Evidence from European firms An artful workplace of the future: The role of art‐based interventions in fostering levers for creativity amongst a diverse workforce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1