Instagram as a Tool of Diffusion for the Livestock Industry

Savannah Locke
{"title":"Instagram as a Tool of Diffusion for the Livestock Industry","authors":"Savannah Locke","doi":"10.4148/1051-0834.2460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that more people are getting their information through social media (SM). With so much misinformation presented in global media, it is difficult for consumers to distinguish what is true and what isn’t. With negative images and minimal context, consumers have a tendency to believe and trust what they see on SM. After IRB approval, a survey study was launched on Qualtrics and accessed via email. Using Instagram as platform, this study presented 5 cognitively and 5 emotionally oriented posts focused on the aspects of animal welfare, diet/health, and environment/sustainability. Prior to viewing the Instagram posts, study participants were given a 5-scale Likert pre survey assessing their opinions about their views of animal welfare, diet/health of consumers of red meat and environment/sustainability for the beef industry. Participants subsequently viewed the posts and then took a post survey. SPSS was used to analyze responses with t-tests and frequencies. ATLAS was used to code for negative and positive key words in open responses. Results showed that participant’s views about the beef industry improved (p < .05) after viewing the media posts for welfare and that participants favored the suggestions that beef cattle are treated humanely. Participants were unsure of the effects that beef consumption has on consumers’ diet and health as well as the environment. Qualitative results suggest that viewing of the posts had a favorable impact on consumer’s opinions.","PeriodicalId":33763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Communications","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that more people are getting their information through social media (SM). With so much misinformation presented in global media, it is difficult for consumers to distinguish what is true and what isn’t. With negative images and minimal context, consumers have a tendency to believe and trust what they see on SM. After IRB approval, a survey study was launched on Qualtrics and accessed via email. Using Instagram as platform, this study presented 5 cognitively and 5 emotionally oriented posts focused on the aspects of animal welfare, diet/health, and environment/sustainability. Prior to viewing the Instagram posts, study participants were given a 5-scale Likert pre survey assessing their opinions about their views of animal welfare, diet/health of consumers of red meat and environment/sustainability for the beef industry. Participants subsequently viewed the posts and then took a post survey. SPSS was used to analyze responses with t-tests and frequencies. ATLAS was used to code for negative and positive key words in open responses. Results showed that participant’s views about the beef industry improved (p < .05) after viewing the media posts for welfare and that participants favored the suggestions that beef cattle are treated humanely. Participants were unsure of the effects that beef consumption has on consumers’ diet and health as well as the environment. Qualitative results suggest that viewing of the posts had a favorable impact on consumer’s opinions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Instagram作为畜牧业的传播工具
研究表明越来越多的人通过社交媒体(SM)获取信息。由于全球媒体上充斥着如此多的错误信息,消费者很难区分什么是真的,什么是假的。在负面形象和极少的背景下,消费者倾向于相信和信任他们在SM上看到的东西。在IRB批准后,对Qualtrics进行了调查研究,并通过电子邮件进行了访问。本研究以Instagram为平台,提出了5个认知导向和5个情感导向的帖子,重点关注动物福利、饮食/健康和环境/可持续性方面。在查看Instagram帖子之前,研究参与者接受了一项5量表的李克特预调查,评估他们对动物福利、红肉消费者的饮食/健康以及牛肉行业的环境/可持续性的看法。参与者随后浏览了这些帖子,然后进行了问卷调查。采用SPSS统计软件进行t检验和频率分析。利用ATLAS对公开回答中的否定关键词和肯定关键词进行编码。结果显示,在观看了媒体关于福利的帖子后,参与者对牛肉行业的看法有所改善(p < 0.05),并且参与者赞成人道对待肉牛的建议。参与者不确定牛肉消费对消费者的饮食、健康以及环境的影响。定性结果表明,观看这些帖子对消费者的看法产生了有利的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Print Grades Prime: A quantitative analysis of producer communication preferences of U.S. beef breed association magazines through the lenses of uses, gratifications, and gatekeeping Perceptions of Science Communication’s Domain, Practices, and Identity: What Concerns Members on the Peripheral Edge of a Community of Practice Exploring Identities of Extension Faculty and Educators as Science Communicators If Nobody Hears Us, Do We Really Make a Sound? Investigating Agriculture Faculty Members’ Engagement in Science Communication The Meat of the Matter: The Effect of Science-based Information on Consumer Perception of Grass-fed Beef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1