Evaluation of Slope Correction Methods to Improve Surface Elevation Change Estimation over Antarctic Ice Sheet using SARAL/AltiKa

Q4 Computer Science 测绘地理信息 Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.58825/jog.2023.17.2.23
Priyanka Patel, Purvee Joshi, Tarang Patadiya, Sushil Kumar Singh, Kunvar Yadav, Sandip Oza
{"title":"Evaluation of Slope Correction Methods to Improve Surface Elevation Change Estimation over Antarctic Ice Sheet using SARAL/AltiKa","authors":"Priyanka Patel, Purvee Joshi, Tarang Patadiya, Sushil Kumar Singh, Kunvar Yadav, Sandip Oza","doi":"10.58825/jog.2023.17.2.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) surface elevation change plays a crucial role in understanding the ice sheet mass balance. The present study focuses on improving AIS surface elevation estimations by incorporating slope correction methods called Direct Method (DM) using SARAL/AltiKa 40 Hz geophysical data record for 2013 (Exact Repeat Mission) and 2020 (Drifting Phase) with terrain slope ranges from 0° to 0.85°. The NASA's Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) has been utilized as a priori topography model to retrieve slope of the AIS terrain. While comparing the two direct methods (DM1 & DM2) based slope corrected elevations with Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) elevation data of November 2013, the RMSE resulted in 0.35 and 0.37 m and biases of the order of 0.26 m and 0.28 m for DM1 and DM2 respectively. Moreover, comparison with ICESat DEM showed the RMSE of the order of 1.81 and 2.09 m, and biases of the order of 0.95 and 0.99 m for DM1 and DM2, respectively. It has been observed that DM1 is the most suitable method for correcting terrain slope with the lowest RMSE and bias. Moreover, the slope induced error correction methods show utmost importance in estimating accurate elevation, especially over undulating terrain of AIS.","PeriodicalId":53688,"journal":{"name":"测绘地理信息","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"测绘地理信息","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58825/jog.2023.17.2.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) surface elevation change plays a crucial role in understanding the ice sheet mass balance. The present study focuses on improving AIS surface elevation estimations by incorporating slope correction methods called Direct Method (DM) using SARAL/AltiKa 40 Hz geophysical data record for 2013 (Exact Repeat Mission) and 2020 (Drifting Phase) with terrain slope ranges from 0° to 0.85°. The NASA's Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) has been utilized as a priori topography model to retrieve slope of the AIS terrain. While comparing the two direct methods (DM1 & DM2) based slope corrected elevations with Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) elevation data of November 2013, the RMSE resulted in 0.35 and 0.37 m and biases of the order of 0.26 m and 0.28 m for DM1 and DM2 respectively. Moreover, comparison with ICESat DEM showed the RMSE of the order of 1.81 and 2.09 m, and biases of the order of 0.95 and 0.99 m for DM1 and DM2, respectively. It has been observed that DM1 is the most suitable method for correcting terrain slope with the lowest RMSE and bias. Moreover, the slope induced error correction methods show utmost importance in estimating accurate elevation, especially over undulating terrain of AIS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用SARAL/AltiKa估算南极冰盖地表高程变化的坡度校正方法评价
南极冰盖表面高程变化对了解冰盖物质平衡起着至关重要的作用。本研究的重点是利用2013年(精确重复任务)和2020年(漂移阶段)地形坡度范围为0°至0.85°的SARAL/AltiKa 40 Hz地球物理数据记录,通过结合直接方法(DM)的坡度校正方法,改进AIS系统的地表高程估计。NASA的冰、云和陆地高程卫星(ICESat)数字高程模型(DEM)被用作先验地形模型来检索AIS地形的坡度。在比较两种直接方法(DM1 &基于2013年11月冰桥行动(OIB)高程数据的坡度修正高程,DM1和DM2的RMSE分别为0.35和0.37 m,偏差分别为0.26 m和0.28 m。与ICESat DEM比较,DM1和DM2的RMSE分别为1.81和2.09 m,偏差分别为0.95和0.99 m。结果表明,DM1是修正地形坡度最合适的方法,RMSE和偏差最小。此外,坡度误差校正方法在AIS系统精确高程估算中显得尤为重要,尤其是在起伏地形上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
测绘地理信息
测绘地理信息 Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4458
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
WebGIS Based Road Crash Information System: A Case Study Site Suitability Assessment for Petroleum hubs and Oil retail assets in the Jomoro District: A Hybrid Approach using Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR Method Analytical study of relation between Land surface temperature and Land Use/Land Cover using spectral indices: A case study of Chandigarh Evaluation of Slope Correction Methods to Improve Surface Elevation Change Estimation over Antarctic Ice Sheet using SARAL/AltiKa Development of Machine Learning based Models for Multivariate Prediction of Wheat Crop Yield in Uttar Pradesh, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1