The Role of Non-Rooted Social Institutions in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation System

Wadim Strielkowski, Svetlana Kalyugina, Elena Astachova, Oxana Mukhoryanova
{"title":"The Role of Non-Rooted Social Institutions in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation System","authors":"Wadim Strielkowski, Svetlana Kalyugina, Elena Astachova, Oxana Mukhoryanova","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.3.106-124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A plethora of recent studies have highlighted the importance of non-rooted social institutions in influencing the effectiveness of regional innovation systems (RIS), and therefore the development of formal and informal organizational and institutional innovations that contribute to socio-economic development. Non-rooted social institutions refer to various organizations, networks, and collaborations that are not directly involved in research or production activities, but still exert a significant influence on regional innovation processes. These institutions can include government agencies responsible for policy-making and funding allocations for innovation programs at the regional level, professional associations promoting knowledge sharing and collaboration among industry professionals across regions, venture capital firms providing financial resources to startups and entrepreneurs, incubators and accelerators offering support services to early-stage ventures, as well as non-profit organizations focusing on community engagement and entrepreneurship education. Our paper focuses on the main rooted and non-rooted social institutions of the RIS systems using a case study of the Russian Federation. Moreover, it determines the degree of their influence on the assessment of their effectiveness. Furthermore, the paper explains that under conditions of economic stability in a region with different levels of innovative potential, the influence of different social institutions on RIS is determined differently. In conditions of economic instability, unrooted social institutions begin to play a key and decisive role. Based on the results of our study, we draw some conclusions regarding the need to take into account external socio-economic factors in the development of tools for assessing the effectiveness of regional innovation systems.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.3.106-124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A plethora of recent studies have highlighted the importance of non-rooted social institutions in influencing the effectiveness of regional innovation systems (RIS), and therefore the development of formal and informal organizational and institutional innovations that contribute to socio-economic development. Non-rooted social institutions refer to various organizations, networks, and collaborations that are not directly involved in research or production activities, but still exert a significant influence on regional innovation processes. These institutions can include government agencies responsible for policy-making and funding allocations for innovation programs at the regional level, professional associations promoting knowledge sharing and collaboration among industry professionals across regions, venture capital firms providing financial resources to startups and entrepreneurs, incubators and accelerators offering support services to early-stage ventures, as well as non-profit organizations focusing on community engagement and entrepreneurship education. Our paper focuses on the main rooted and non-rooted social institutions of the RIS systems using a case study of the Russian Federation. Moreover, it determines the degree of their influence on the assessment of their effectiveness. Furthermore, the paper explains that under conditions of economic stability in a region with different levels of innovative potential, the influence of different social institutions on RIS is determined differently. In conditions of economic instability, unrooted social institutions begin to play a key and decisive role. Based on the results of our study, we draw some conclusions regarding the need to take into account external socio-economic factors in the development of tools for assessing the effectiveness of regional innovation systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非根植社会机构在区域创新系统有效性评价中的作用
最近的大量研究强调了无根社会机构在影响区域创新系统(RIS)的有效性方面的重要性,因此也强调了促进社会经济发展的正式和非正式组织和机构创新的发展的重要性。非根植社会机构是指不直接参与研究或生产活动,但仍对区域创新过程产生重大影响的各种组织、网络和协作。这些机构可以包括负责区域创新项目决策和资金分配的政府机构、促进跨区域行业专业人士之间知识共享和合作的专业协会、为初创企业和企业家提供财务资源的风险投资公司、为早期企业提供支持服务的孵化器和加速器、以及专注于社区参与和创业教育的非营利组织。本文以俄罗斯联邦为例,重点研究了RIS系统的主要根深蒂固和非根深蒂固的社会制度。此外,它还决定了它们对评估其有效性的影响程度。进一步解释了在不同创新潜力水平区域经济稳定的条件下,不同社会制度对RIS的影响是不同的。在经济不稳定的条件下,无根的社会制度开始发挥关键和决定性的作用。基于我们的研究结果,我们得出了一些关于在开发评估区域创新系统有效性的工具时需要考虑外部社会经济因素的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
On Intra-Group Allocative Efficiency of Resources in Industrial Business Models The Role of Non-Rooted Social Institutions in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation System Empirical Analysis of Cheating Among Students on the Basis of Surveys Factors of the Emergence of Collective Actions of Russian Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Budgetary Borrowings and Investments in Russian Regions: Regulatory Issues and Opportunities for Enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1