{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes After Epigastric Hernia Repair in Women—A Nationwide Database Study","authors":"M. W. Christoffersen, N. A. Henriksen","doi":"10.3389/jaws.2023.11626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Women have the highest prevalence of epigastric hernia repair. Outcomes after epigastric hernia repair are rarely reported independently, although pathology and surgical techniques may be different than for other primary ventral hernias. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after epigastric hernia repairs in women on a nationwide basis. Methods: Nationwide cohort study from the Danish Hernia Database. Complete data from women undergoing elective epigastric hernia repair during a 12 years period (2007–2018) was extracted. A 100% follow-up was obtained by combining data from the National Civil Register. The primary outcome was operation for recurrence, secondary outcomes were readmission and operation for complications. Outcomes for open sutured repair, open mesh repair mesh, and laparoscopic repairs were compared. Results: In total, 3,031 women underwent elective epigastric hernia repair during the study period. Some 1,671 (55.1%) women underwent open sutured repair, 796 (26.3%) underwent open mesh repair, and 564 (18.6%) underwent laparoscopic repair. Follow-up was median 4.8 years. Operation for recurrence was higher after sutured repairs than after open mesh and laparoscopic repairs (7.7% vs. 3.3%, vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). The risk of operation for complications was slightly higher after open mesh repair compared with sutured repair and laparoscopic repair (2.6% vs. 1.2%, vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032), with more operations for wound complications in the open mesh group (2.0%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: More than half of the women underwent a suture-based repair, although mesh repair reduces risk of recurrence. Open mesh repair had the lowest risk of recurrence, but on the expense of slightly increased risk of wound-related complications.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2023.11626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Women have the highest prevalence of epigastric hernia repair. Outcomes after epigastric hernia repair are rarely reported independently, although pathology and surgical techniques may be different than for other primary ventral hernias. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after epigastric hernia repairs in women on a nationwide basis. Methods: Nationwide cohort study from the Danish Hernia Database. Complete data from women undergoing elective epigastric hernia repair during a 12 years period (2007–2018) was extracted. A 100% follow-up was obtained by combining data from the National Civil Register. The primary outcome was operation for recurrence, secondary outcomes were readmission and operation for complications. Outcomes for open sutured repair, open mesh repair mesh, and laparoscopic repairs were compared. Results: In total, 3,031 women underwent elective epigastric hernia repair during the study period. Some 1,671 (55.1%) women underwent open sutured repair, 796 (26.3%) underwent open mesh repair, and 564 (18.6%) underwent laparoscopic repair. Follow-up was median 4.8 years. Operation for recurrence was higher after sutured repairs than after open mesh and laparoscopic repairs (7.7% vs. 3.3%, vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). The risk of operation for complications was slightly higher after open mesh repair compared with sutured repair and laparoscopic repair (2.6% vs. 1.2%, vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032), with more operations for wound complications in the open mesh group (2.0%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: More than half of the women underwent a suture-based repair, although mesh repair reduces risk of recurrence. Open mesh repair had the lowest risk of recurrence, but on the expense of slightly increased risk of wound-related complications.
目的:女性腹上疝修补率最高。尽管病理和手术技术可能与其他原发性腹疝不同,但腹壁疝修复后的结果很少独立报道。本研究的目的是在全国范围内评估女性腹壁疝修补术后的长期预后。方法:来自丹麦疝数据库的全国队列研究。提取了12年(2007-2018)期间接受择期腹壁疝修补术的妇女的完整数据。通过结合国家民事登记处的数据,获得了100%的随访。主要结局是手术治疗复发,次要结局是再入院和手术治疗并发症。比较开放式缝合修复、开放式补片修复和腹腔镜修复的结果。结果:在研究期间,总共有3031名妇女接受了择期腹壁疝修补术。约1671例(55.1%)女性接受了开放式缝合修复,796例(26.3%)接受了开放式补片修复,564例(18.6%)接受了腹腔镜修复。随访时间中位数为4.8年。缝合修复后的复发率高于开放补片和腹腔镜修复后的复发率(7.7% vs. 3.3% vs. 6.2%, p <0.001)。开放式补片修复术后并发症的手术风险略高于缝合修复和腹腔镜修复(2.6% vs. 1.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032),开放式补片组因伤口并发症的手术风险更高(2.0%,p = 0.006)。结论:超过一半的女性接受了基于缝线的修复,尽管补片修复降低了复发的风险。开放式补片修复有最低的复发风险,但代价是伤口相关并发症的风险略有增加。