Religious lobbying and policy influence: Christian interest group impacts around the legalization of same‐sex marriage in England and Wales

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1111/polp.12559
Daniel Gover
{"title":"Religious lobbying and policy influence: Christian interest group impacts around the legalization of same‐sex marriage in England and Wales","authors":"Daniel Gover","doi":"10.1111/polp.12559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The influence of religious groups in democratic policy making has often been a source of political controversy. In the United Kingdom, the legalization of same‐sex marriage in England and Wales may in some ways be thought to exemplify the weakening social position and policy power of the churches. Drawing on a mixture of methods—including analysis of newspaper coverage, legislative debates, and policy documents, plus interviews—this article assesses the extent to which Christian interest groups achieved different forms of policy‐related influence, and its dynamics. It finds that, despite important failures, these groups nonetheless achieved various types of success, including over the policy debate, small policy shifts, and “counteractive” influence, reflecting both the weaknesses and persisting strengths of Christianity within British society. The findings are likely to have wider implications for understanding the policy strengths of religious actors in similar contexts of socio‐religious change elsewhere. Related Articles Bramlett, Brittany H. 2012. “The Cross‐Pressures of Religion and Contact with Gays and Lesbians, and their Impact on Same‐Sex Marriage Opinion.” Politics & Policy 40(1): 13–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2011.00337.x . Ledet, Richard. 2017. “Sorting the Left from the Rest: The Communitarian Religious Perspective and Liberal Economic Attitudes.” Politics & Policy 45(6): 1051–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12238 . Tubadji, Annie. 2023. “You'll Never Walk Alone: Loneliness, Religion, and Politico‐Economic Transformation.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 661–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12538 .","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The influence of religious groups in democratic policy making has often been a source of political controversy. In the United Kingdom, the legalization of same‐sex marriage in England and Wales may in some ways be thought to exemplify the weakening social position and policy power of the churches. Drawing on a mixture of methods—including analysis of newspaper coverage, legislative debates, and policy documents, plus interviews—this article assesses the extent to which Christian interest groups achieved different forms of policy‐related influence, and its dynamics. It finds that, despite important failures, these groups nonetheless achieved various types of success, including over the policy debate, small policy shifts, and “counteractive” influence, reflecting both the weaknesses and persisting strengths of Christianity within British society. The findings are likely to have wider implications for understanding the policy strengths of religious actors in similar contexts of socio‐religious change elsewhere. Related Articles Bramlett, Brittany H. 2012. “The Cross‐Pressures of Religion and Contact with Gays and Lesbians, and their Impact on Same‐Sex Marriage Opinion.” Politics & Policy 40(1): 13–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2011.00337.x . Ledet, Richard. 2017. “Sorting the Left from the Rest: The Communitarian Religious Perspective and Liberal Economic Attitudes.” Politics & Policy 45(6): 1051–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12238 . Tubadji, Annie. 2023. “You'll Never Walk Alone: Loneliness, Religion, and Politico‐Economic Transformation.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 661–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12538 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教游说和政策影响:基督教利益集团对英格兰和威尔士同性婚姻合法化的影响
宗教团体对民主决策的影响往往是政治争议的一个来源。在英国,同性婚姻在英格兰和威尔士的合法化可能在某种程度上被认为是教会社会地位和政策权力削弱的例证。本文采用多种方法,包括对报纸报道、立法辩论和政策文件的分析,以及采访,评估了基督教利益集团在多大程度上实现了不同形式的政策相关影响,以及其动态。它发现,尽管有重大的失败,这些团体仍然取得了各种各样的成功,包括在政策辩论中,小的政策转变,以及“反作用”的影响,反映了基督教在英国社会中的弱点和持久的优势。这些发现可能会对理解其他地方类似社会宗教变化背景下宗教行为者的政策优势产生更广泛的影响。布拉姆利特,布列塔尼H. 2012。“宗教与同性恋接触的交叉压力,以及它们对同性婚姻观点的影响。”政治,政策40(1):13-42。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747 1346.2011.00337.x。理查德·莱德,2017。“将左派与其他区分开来:社群主义宗教观点和自由主义经济态度。”政治,政策45(6):1051-79。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12238。安妮·图巴吉,2023年。《你永远不会独行:孤独、宗教与政治经济转型》政治,政策51(4):661-95。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12538。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Where you stand depends on where you sit”: The politics of petroleum pricing in Ghana's election cycle Note from the Editor and Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023–2024 A paradox of public engagement: The discursive politics of environmental justice in Canada's Chemical Valley Democratic interventionists versus pragmatic realists: Employing the advocacy coalition framework to explain Obama's shift in multilateralism with European allies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1