New Iterative Resistivity Modeling Workflow Reduces Uncertainty in the Assessment of Water Saturation in Deeply Invaded Reservoirs

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM Petrophysics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.30632/pjv64n4-2023a5
German Merletti, Michael Rabinovich, Salim Al Hajri, William Dawson, Russell Farmer, Joaquin Ambia, Carlos Torres-Verdín
{"title":"New Iterative Resistivity Modeling Workflow Reduces Uncertainty in the Assessment of Water Saturation in Deeply Invaded Reservoirs","authors":"German Merletti, Michael Rabinovich, Salim Al Hajri, William Dawson, Russell Farmer, Joaquin Ambia, Carlos Torres-Verdín","doi":"10.30632/pjv64n4-2023a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new iterative modeling workflow has been designed to reduce the uncertainty of water saturation (Sw) calculations in the tight Barik sandstone in the Sultanate of Oman. Results from this case study indicate that Sw can be overestimated by up to 20 s.u. if the as-acquired deep resistivity is used in volumetric calculations. Overbalanced drilling causes deep invasion of water-based mud (WBM) filtrate into porous and permeable rocks, leading to the radial displacement of in-situ saturating fluids away from the wellbore. In low-porosity reservoirs drilled with WBM, the inability of the filtration process to quickly build impermeable mudcake translates into long radial transition zones. Under certain reservoir and drilling conditions, deep resistivity logs cannot reliably measure true formation resistivity and are, therefore, unable to provide an accurate assessment of hydrocarbon saturation. The effect of mud-filtrate invasion on resistivity logs has been extensively documented. Processing techniques use resistivity inversion and tool-specific forward modeling to provide uninvaded formation resistivity logs, which are much better suited for in-place resource volume assessment. However, sensitivity analysis shows that the accuracy of invasion-corrected logs dramatically decreases as the depth of invasion increases, whereby the inversion process needs to be further constrained. The new workflow is designed to reduce the non-uniqueness of true formation resistivity models so that they honor multiple and independent petrophysical data. The inversion routine utilizes a Bayesian algorithm coupled with Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Inversion results are iteratively modified based on two rock property models : one derived from rock-core data (helium expansion porosity and Dean-Stark saturations) and the other using an equivalent log interpretation of thick reservoir intervals from oil-based mud (OBM) wells. Simulated borehole resistivity is compared to field logs after each validation loop against rock property models. The new inversion-based workflow is extensively tested in the unconventional tight Barik Formation across water-free hydrocarbon and perched water intervals, and inversion-derived Sw models are independently validated by capillary-pressure-derived saturation-height models and fluid inflow rate from production logs.","PeriodicalId":49703,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n4-2023a5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new iterative modeling workflow has been designed to reduce the uncertainty of water saturation (Sw) calculations in the tight Barik sandstone in the Sultanate of Oman. Results from this case study indicate that Sw can be overestimated by up to 20 s.u. if the as-acquired deep resistivity is used in volumetric calculations. Overbalanced drilling causes deep invasion of water-based mud (WBM) filtrate into porous and permeable rocks, leading to the radial displacement of in-situ saturating fluids away from the wellbore. In low-porosity reservoirs drilled with WBM, the inability of the filtration process to quickly build impermeable mudcake translates into long radial transition zones. Under certain reservoir and drilling conditions, deep resistivity logs cannot reliably measure true formation resistivity and are, therefore, unable to provide an accurate assessment of hydrocarbon saturation. The effect of mud-filtrate invasion on resistivity logs has been extensively documented. Processing techniques use resistivity inversion and tool-specific forward modeling to provide uninvaded formation resistivity logs, which are much better suited for in-place resource volume assessment. However, sensitivity analysis shows that the accuracy of invasion-corrected logs dramatically decreases as the depth of invasion increases, whereby the inversion process needs to be further constrained. The new workflow is designed to reduce the non-uniqueness of true formation resistivity models so that they honor multiple and independent petrophysical data. The inversion routine utilizes a Bayesian algorithm coupled with Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Inversion results are iteratively modified based on two rock property models : one derived from rock-core data (helium expansion porosity and Dean-Stark saturations) and the other using an equivalent log interpretation of thick reservoir intervals from oil-based mud (OBM) wells. Simulated borehole resistivity is compared to field logs after each validation loop against rock property models. The new inversion-based workflow is extensively tested in the unconventional tight Barik Formation across water-free hydrocarbon and perched water intervals, and inversion-derived Sw models are independently validated by capillary-pressure-derived saturation-height models and fluid inflow rate from production logs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的迭代电阻率建模工作流程减少了深侵油藏含水饱和度评估中的不确定性
为了减少阿曼巴里克致密砂岩含水饱和度(Sw)计算的不确定性,设计了一种新的迭代建模工作流程。该案例研究的结果表明,如果将获得的深部电阻率用于体积计算,则Sw可能被高估高达20 s.u.。不平衡钻井会导致水基泥浆(WBM)滤液深入渗透到多孔和渗透性岩石中,导致原位饱和流体径向位移,远离井筒。在使用WBM钻井的低孔隙度油藏中,由于过滤过程无法快速形成不透水的泥饼,导致了长径向过渡层。在某些油藏和钻井条件下,深部电阻率测井不能可靠地测量真实的地层电阻率,因此无法准确评估油气饱和度。泥浆滤液侵入对电阻率测井的影响已被广泛报道。处理技术使用电阻率反演和特定工具的正演建模来提供未入侵的地层电阻率测井,这更适合于现场资源体积评估。然而,敏感性分析表明,随着侵入深度的增加,入侵校正测井曲线的精度急剧下降,需要进一步约束反演过程。新的工作流程旨在减少真实地层电阻率模型的非唯一性,使其能够支持多种独立的岩石物理数据。反演程序利用贝叶斯算法与马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)采样相结合。反演结果基于两种岩石性质模型进行迭代修正:一种基于岩心数据(氦膨胀孔隙度和Dean-Stark饱和度),另一种基于油基泥浆(OBM)井厚层储层的等效测井解释。根据岩石性质模型,在每个验证循环后,将模拟井眼电阻率与现场测井进行比较。新的基于反演的工作流程在非常规致密的Barik地层中进行了广泛的测试,包括无水烃层和静止水层,并通过毛细管压力反演的饱和度-高度模型和生产测井记录的流体流入速率独立验证了反演的Sw模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Petrophysics
Petrophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Petrophysics contains original contributions on theoretical and applied aspects of formation evaluation, including both open hole and cased hole well logging, core analysis and formation testing.
期刊最新文献
Integrated Formation Evaluation for Site-Specific Evaluation, Optimization, and Permitting of Carbon Storage Projects Stress Measurement Campaign in Scientific Deep Boreholes: Focus on Tools and Methods Enhanced Reservoir Description via Areal Data Integration and Reservoir Fluid Geodynamics: A Case Study From Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Probe Screening Techniques for Rapid, High-Resolution Core Analysis and Their Potential Usefulness for Energy Transition Applications Numerical Simulation of Well Logs Based on Core Measurements: An Effective Method for Data Quality Control and Improved Petrophysical Interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1