{"title":"Autofiction of the Cognitariat: Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog","authors":"Elisa Cuter","doi":"10.24140/ijfma.v8.n2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artists and intellectuals living in precarious conditions (or: belonging to the cognitariat), find themselves at the crossroad between precarity and privilege. Julian Radlmaier’s Selbstkritik eines bürgerlichen Hundes (Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog GER, 2017) deals with this issue in a very explicit, self-reflexive way. Its protagonist is a filmmaker on the dole who is sent by the German workfare program to work seasonally as an apple picker. Once at the orchard, when the other workers attempt a revolt, he discovers that his attachment to his status as an artist impedes him to join their struggle. The autofictional form of the film, I demonstrate, reflects a subjectivation dynamic that turns into a spiral of perceived debt, guilt, and political paralysis. By internalizing a widespread anti-intellectual bias, the film offers a paradigmatic account of why it is difficult for members of the cognitariat to solidarize with other segments of the precariat or the working class: the difficulty depends largely on the internalization of neoliberal capitalism’s ambivalent consideration of immaterial, cognitive, and creative work.","PeriodicalId":36220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Film and Media Arts","volume":"31 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Film and Media Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24140/ijfma.v8.n2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artists and intellectuals living in precarious conditions (or: belonging to the cognitariat), find themselves at the crossroad between precarity and privilege. Julian Radlmaier’s Selbstkritik eines bürgerlichen Hundes (Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog GER, 2017) deals with this issue in a very explicit, self-reflexive way. Its protagonist is a filmmaker on the dole who is sent by the German workfare program to work seasonally as an apple picker. Once at the orchard, when the other workers attempt a revolt, he discovers that his attachment to his status as an artist impedes him to join their struggle. The autofictional form of the film, I demonstrate, reflects a subjectivation dynamic that turns into a spiral of perceived debt, guilt, and political paralysis. By internalizing a widespread anti-intellectual bias, the film offers a paradigmatic account of why it is difficult for members of the cognitariat to solidarize with other segments of the precariat or the working class: the difficulty depends largely on the internalization of neoliberal capitalism’s ambivalent consideration of immaterial, cognitive, and creative work.
艺术家和知识分子生活在不稳定的条件下(或:属于认知者),发现自己在不稳定和特权之间的十字路口。朱利安·拉德迈尔(Julian Radlmaier)的《资产阶级狗的自我批评》(Selbstkritik eines b rgerlichen Hundes)以一种非常明确的、自我反思的方式处理了这个问题。它的主人公是一位靠救济金生活的电影制作人,他被德国的福利计划派去做季节性的苹果采摘工。一到果园,当其他工人试图反抗时,他发现自己对艺术家身份的依恋阻碍了他加入他们的斗争。我证明,这部电影的自虚构形式反映了一种主体化的动力,这种动力变成了一种感知债务、内疚和政治瘫痪的螺旋。通过内化普遍存在的反智偏见,这部电影提供了一个典型的解释,说明为什么认知阶层的成员很难与不稳定阶级或工人阶级的其他部分团结起来:这种困难在很大程度上取决于新自由主义资本主义对非物质、认知和创造性工作的矛盾考虑的内化。