The Northfield Experiments and the therapeutic community task

IF 0.1 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Therapeutic Communities Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1108/tc-10-2022-0016
Tom Harrison
{"title":"The Northfield Experiments and the therapeutic community task","authors":"Tom Harrison","doi":"10.1108/tc-10-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to raise awareness of the importance of the sociological aspects of therapeutic community work, including clarity about the nature of the task, the power of informal interactions between participants and the relevance of leadership. Design/methodology/approach Applying insights from historical research to present-day practice. Findings The Northfield experiments offer a number of insights into present-day practice of therapeutic communities and enabling environments. These include clarity about the task, the relevance of participant interactions outside of specifically therapeutic work and the importance of leadership. Social implications The therapeutic community/enabling environments approach has relevance to a wider sector of society than solely the therapeutic. More attention needs to be paid to leadership issues in the therapeutic community movement, as well as the therapeutic power of the mutual support networks amongst those receiving care. Originality/value Through the lens of the Northfield experiments, this paper offers a broadening of the sociological nature of therapeutic community practice, arguing that the purpose is to enable greater social adaptability, thereby enhancing relationships and deepening our awareness of ourselves. Implicit in this perspective is the recognition of the power of non-formal interrelationships in the service as well as the importance of leadership. It is also suggested that our experience in this way of working has a value in other organisations such as work places or schools. However, to achieve this, we need to adapt our language appropriately.","PeriodicalId":43236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Communities","volume":"29 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tc-10-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to raise awareness of the importance of the sociological aspects of therapeutic community work, including clarity about the nature of the task, the power of informal interactions between participants and the relevance of leadership. Design/methodology/approach Applying insights from historical research to present-day practice. Findings The Northfield experiments offer a number of insights into present-day practice of therapeutic communities and enabling environments. These include clarity about the task, the relevance of participant interactions outside of specifically therapeutic work and the importance of leadership. Social implications The therapeutic community/enabling environments approach has relevance to a wider sector of society than solely the therapeutic. More attention needs to be paid to leadership issues in the therapeutic community movement, as well as the therapeutic power of the mutual support networks amongst those receiving care. Originality/value Through the lens of the Northfield experiments, this paper offers a broadening of the sociological nature of therapeutic community practice, arguing that the purpose is to enable greater social adaptability, thereby enhancing relationships and deepening our awareness of ourselves. Implicit in this perspective is the recognition of the power of non-formal interrelationships in the service as well as the importance of leadership. It is also suggested that our experience in this way of working has a value in other organisations such as work places or schools. However, to achieve this, we need to adapt our language appropriately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诺斯菲尔德实验和治疗性社区任务
本研究旨在提高人们对治疗性社区工作社会学方面重要性的认识,包括明确任务的性质、参与者之间非正式互动的力量以及领导的相关性。设计/方法/方法将历史研究的见解应用于当今的实践。诺斯菲尔德的实验为当今治疗社区和有利环境的实践提供了许多见解。这些因素包括任务的清晰度、参与者在特定治疗工作之外的互动的相关性以及领导力的重要性。社会影响治疗社区/有利环境方法与更广泛的社会部门相关,而不仅仅是治疗。需要更多地关注治疗社区运动中的领导问题,以及接受治疗的人之间相互支持网络的治疗能力。通过诺斯菲尔德实验的镜头,本文提供了治疗性社区实践的社会学性质的扩展,认为其目的是使更大的社会适应性,从而加强关系和加深我们对自己的认识。这一观点隐含着对服务中非正式相互关系的力量以及领导力重要性的认识。也有人认为,我们这种工作方式的经验对其他组织(如工作场所或学校)也有价值。然而,要做到这一点,我们需要适当地调整我们的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Communities
Therapeutic Communities SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes academic papers, case studies, empirical research and opinion. The Journal is interested in publishing papers that critically creatively engage with ideas drawn from a range of discourses: the therapeutic community movement and other related professional practice, psychoanalysis, art, literature, poetry, music, architecture, culture, education, philosophy, religion and environmental studies. It will be of value to those who work in health services, social services, voluntary and charitable organizations and for all professionals involved with staff teams in therapeutic and supportive organizations.
期刊最新文献
The Northfield Experiments and the therapeutic community task A critical review of the antecedents of enabling communities Thematic group activities: accommodating the individual needs of clients undergoing therapeutic community approach in Indonesia Looking forward to 2023 Perceived effectiveness of therapeutic community model as a rehabilitation approach for Sri Lankan individuals with substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1