Measuring university size. A comparison of Academic Personnel versus Scientific Talent Pool data

IF 4.1 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Quantitative Science Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1162/qss_a_00273
Benedetto Lepori, Lutz Bornmann, Félix de Moya Anegón
{"title":"Measuring university size. A comparison of Academic Personnel versus Scientific Talent Pool data","authors":"Benedetto Lepori, Lutz Bornmann, Félix de Moya Anegón","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper compares two measures of organizational size of Higher Education Institutions widely used in the literature: the number of Academic Personnel (AP) measured according to definitions from international education statistics, and the Scientific Talent Pool (STP), i.e. the number of unique authors affiliated to the HEI as derived from the Scopus database. Based on their definitions and operationalizations, we derive expectations on the factors generating differences between these two measures, as related to the HEI’s research orientation and subject mix, as well as to the presence of a university hospital. We test these expectations on a sample of more than 1,500 HEIs in Europe by combining data from the European Tertiary Education Register and from the Scimago Institutions Ranking. Our results provide support to the expected relationships and also highlight cases where the institutional perimeter of HEIs is systematically different between the two sources. We conclude that these two indicators provide complementary measures of institutional size, one more focused on the organizational perimeter as defined by employment relationships, the other on the persons who contribute to the HEI’s scientific visibility. Comparing the two indicators therefore is likely to provide a more in-depth understanding of the HEI resources available. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00273","PeriodicalId":34021,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Science Studies","volume":"10 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Science Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper compares two measures of organizational size of Higher Education Institutions widely used in the literature: the number of Academic Personnel (AP) measured according to definitions from international education statistics, and the Scientific Talent Pool (STP), i.e. the number of unique authors affiliated to the HEI as derived from the Scopus database. Based on their definitions and operationalizations, we derive expectations on the factors generating differences between these two measures, as related to the HEI’s research orientation and subject mix, as well as to the presence of a university hospital. We test these expectations on a sample of more than 1,500 HEIs in Europe by combining data from the European Tertiary Education Register and from the Scimago Institutions Ranking. Our results provide support to the expected relationships and also highlight cases where the institutional perimeter of HEIs is systematically different between the two sources. We conclude that these two indicators provide complementary measures of institutional size, one more focused on the organizational perimeter as defined by employment relationships, the other on the persons who contribute to the HEI’s scientific visibility. Comparing the two indicators therefore is likely to provide a more in-depth understanding of the HEI resources available. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00273
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量大学规模。学术人员与科学人才库数据的比较
摘要本文比较了文献中广泛使用的两种衡量高等教育机构组织规模的指标:根据国际教育统计定义测量的学术人员数量(AP)和来自Scopus数据库的科学人才库(STP),即隶属于高等教育机构的唯一作者数量。根据它们的定义和操作,我们得出了对这两个指标之间产生差异的因素的期望,这些因素与高等教育机构的研究方向和学科组合以及大学医院的存在有关。我们对欧洲1500多所高等教育机构的样本进行了测试,并结合了欧洲高等教育注册表(European Tertiary Education Register)和Scimago机构排名的数据。我们的研究结果为预期的关系提供了支持,也突出了两种来源之间高等教育机构范围系统不同的情况。我们得出的结论是,这两个指标提供了机构规模的补充措施,一个更关注由雇佣关系定义的组织边界,另一个关注为高等教育机构的科学可见度做出贡献的人员。因此,比较这两个指标可能有助于更深入地了解现有的高等教育资源。同行评议https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00273
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Science Studies
Quantitative Science Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Technological Impact of Funded Research: A Case Study of Non-Patent References Socio-cultural factors and academic openness of world countries Scope and limitations of library metrics for the assessment of ebook usage: COUNTER R5 and link resolver The rise of responsible metrics as a professional reform movement: A collective action frames account New methodologies for the digital age? How methods (re-)organize research using social media data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1