Romania’s 1866 Electoral System and the Quest for National Sovereignty

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.2478/jles-2023-0016
Răzvan Cosmin Roghină
{"title":"Romania’s 1866 Electoral System and the Quest for National Sovereignty","authors":"Răzvan Cosmin Roghină","doi":"10.2478/jles-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1866, religion played a significant role in unifying the Romanian national spirit. A foreign prince was brought to rule under the Orthodox faith, and this religious aspect was incorporated into Article 82 of the Constitution. The limitation of political rights in Romania was based on ethnic criteria, with Jews and other non-Christians excluded from full participation. The electoral system introduced a high property-based voting qualification, reflecting, to some extent, liberal principles, but effectively limiting actual participation. Thus, the Romanian Constitution of 1866 struck a delicate balance between borrowed liberal ideals and the specific cultural context of Romania. It emphasized the role of religion and property ownership in shaping political rights and identity, while also attempting to align with European constitutional standards. The electoral system of 1866 in Romania fell short of democratic ideals and perpetuated inequalities. It shaped the political landscape and had far-reaching consequences for the country’s governance and representation.","PeriodicalId":47756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2023-0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In 1866, religion played a significant role in unifying the Romanian national spirit. A foreign prince was brought to rule under the Orthodox faith, and this religious aspect was incorporated into Article 82 of the Constitution. The limitation of political rights in Romania was based on ethnic criteria, with Jews and other non-Christians excluded from full participation. The electoral system introduced a high property-based voting qualification, reflecting, to some extent, liberal principles, but effectively limiting actual participation. Thus, the Romanian Constitution of 1866 struck a delicate balance between borrowed liberal ideals and the specific cultural context of Romania. It emphasized the role of religion and property ownership in shaping political rights and identity, while also attempting to align with European constitutional standards. The electoral system of 1866 in Romania fell short of democratic ideals and perpetuated inequalities. It shaped the political landscape and had far-reaching consequences for the country’s governance and representation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚1866年的选举制度和对国家主权的追求
1866年,宗教在统一罗马尼亚民族精神方面发挥了重要作用。一位外国王子被引入东正教统治,这一宗教方面被纳入宪法第82条。罗马尼亚对政治权利的限制是以种族标准为基础的,犹太人和其他非基督徒被排除在充分参与之外。选举制度引入了以财产为基础的高投票资格,这在一定程度上反映了自由主义原则,但实际上限制了实际参与。因此,1866年的罗马尼亚宪法在借用的自由主义理想和罗马尼亚特定的文化背景之间取得了微妙的平衡。它强调宗教和财产所有权在塑造政治权利和身份方面的作用,同时也试图与欧洲宪法标准保持一致。1866年罗马尼亚的选举制度不符合民主理想,使不平等永久化。它塑造了政治格局,并对国家的治理和代表性产生了深远的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Studies is a journal of interdisciplinary academic research into law and legal institutions. It emphasizes social science approaches, especially those of economics, political science, and psychology, but it also publishes the work of historians, philosophers, and others who are interested in legal theory. The JLS was founded in 1972.
期刊最新文献
Forensic Science Integration in Legal Education: A Paradigm Shift for Strengthening Legal Expertise in Pakistan QUO Quadis Romanian Education? Brief Introspection Tax Evasion Between Tax Optimization at the Border of Legality, Tax Burden and Voluntary Compliance Genesis of Legal Regulation of Pre-Trial Detention in Sweden and Ukraine: Comparative Analysis Oligarchic Politics in the Context of a Democratic Rule of Law in Relation to the Principle of Expediency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1