Conceptualizing Urban Inequalities as a Complex Socio-Technical Phenomenon

IF 3.3 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geographical Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1111/gean.12373
Ruth Nelson, Martijn Warnier, Dr Trivik Verma
{"title":"Conceptualizing Urban Inequalities as a Complex Socio-Technical Phenomenon","authors":"Ruth Nelson,&nbsp;Martijn Warnier,&nbsp;Dr Trivik Verma","doi":"10.1111/gean.12373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The United Nations World Social Report (2020) reveals that more than two thirds of the world's population live in countries where urban inequalities have increased in the last three decades. While urban inequalities are traditionally characterized as an economic issue, scholars are increasingly applying methods from geospatial analysis to study them. In the context of these advancements, it remains unclear what underlying perspectives are guiding decisions to concentrate on certain aspects of urban inequalities, while potentially ignoring others. We address this gap by reviewing the literature centered on the geospatial analysis of urban inequalities and identify three predominant research lenses from accessibility, distribution, and policy and stakeholder perspectives. As a primary contribution of this article, we connect the perspectives with ideas drawn from complexity theory to develop an overarching socio-technical framework for how urban inequalities emerge over space and time. While traditional scientific frameworks seek to increase knowledge through causality, complexity science acknowledges the inherent challenges in defining, understanding and solving complex problems such as urban inequalities, which has profound implications for their representation, modeling and interpretation. We critically reflect on the framework through key relational themes and insights drawn from the literature and close with considerations for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"56 2","pages":"187-216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.12373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.12373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Nations World Social Report (2020) reveals that more than two thirds of the world's population live in countries where urban inequalities have increased in the last three decades. While urban inequalities are traditionally characterized as an economic issue, scholars are increasingly applying methods from geospatial analysis to study them. In the context of these advancements, it remains unclear what underlying perspectives are guiding decisions to concentrate on certain aspects of urban inequalities, while potentially ignoring others. We address this gap by reviewing the literature centered on the geospatial analysis of urban inequalities and identify three predominant research lenses from accessibility, distribution, and policy and stakeholder perspectives. As a primary contribution of this article, we connect the perspectives with ideas drawn from complexity theory to develop an overarching socio-technical framework for how urban inequalities emerge over space and time. While traditional scientific frameworks seek to increase knowledge through causality, complexity science acknowledges the inherent challenges in defining, understanding and solving complex problems such as urban inequalities, which has profound implications for their representation, modeling and interpretation. We critically reflect on the framework through key relational themes and insights drawn from the literature and close with considerations for future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将城市不平等现象概念化为复杂的社会技术现象
联合国《世界社会报告》(2020 年)显示,世界人口的三分之二以上生活在过去三十年城市不平等现象加剧的国家。虽然城市不平等传统上被定性为经济问题,但学者们正越来越多地应用地理空间分析方法来研究这些问题。在这些进步的背景下,目前仍不清楚是哪些基本观点在指导着人们决定集中研究城市不平等的某些方面,而可能忽略其他方面。为了弥补这一不足,我们回顾了以城市不平等的地理空间分析为中心的文献,并从可达性、分布以及政策和利益相关者的角度确定了三个主要的研究视角。作为本文的主要贡献,我们将这些视角与复杂性理论中的观点联系起来,为城市不平等现象如何在空间和时间上的出现建立了一个总体的社会技术框架。传统的科学框架寻求通过因果关系增加知识,而复杂性科学则承认在定义、理解和解决城市不平等等复杂问题时所面临的固有挑战,这对这些问题的表述、建模和解释具有深远影响。我们通过从文献中汲取的关键关系主题和见解对这一框架进行了批判性反思,最后提出了对未来研究的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Impacts of improved transport on regional market access Testing Hypotheses When You Have More Than a Few* Beyond Auto‐Models: Self‐Correlated Sui‐Model Respecifications Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1