{"title":"Measuring Systemic Oppression: Possibilities and (Re)Imaginings for Measuring Cisheterosexism in Education Research","authors":"Olivia Copeland, Cindy Ann Kilgo","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2260514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSeveral disciplines have developed quantitative measures for systemic oppression against queer and trans people, including psychology, criminal justice, and gender and sexuality studies. These instruments can have wide-ranging influence on other fields, including higher education research. To explore how these studies operationalize queer and trans oppression, we conducted a systematic review of 33 survey instruments across seven disciplines, coding them within an ecological framework. Results revealed lingering challenges for accurate measurement of queer and trans oppression and have significant implications on the use of inflationary and problematic language in quantitative instruments. We offer implications for those in education who may adapt similar instruments, in the hopes that scholars and practitioners are mindful to the scope of queer and trans oppression. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47443,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2260514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractSeveral disciplines have developed quantitative measures for systemic oppression against queer and trans people, including psychology, criminal justice, and gender and sexuality studies. These instruments can have wide-ranging influence on other fields, including higher education research. To explore how these studies operationalize queer and trans oppression, we conducted a systematic review of 33 survey instruments across seven disciplines, coding them within an ecological framework. Results revealed lingering challenges for accurate measurement of queer and trans oppression and have significant implications on the use of inflationary and problematic language in quantitative instruments. We offer implications for those in education who may adapt similar instruments, in the hopes that scholars and practitioners are mindful to the scope of queer and trans oppression. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
Educational Studies aims to provide a forum for original investigations and theoretical studies in education. The journal publishes fully refereed papers which cover applied and theoretical approaches to the study of education. Papers should constitute original research, and should be methodologically sound, theoretically informed, and of relevance to an international audience. The journal is particularly interested in research that aims to inform educational practice(s) within and/or across sectors. Whilst the journal is principally concerned with the social sciences, contributions from a wider field are also encouraged. Empirically-based papers are particularly welcome.