Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka

Q2 Social Sciences Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1163/2211906x-12030004
Stellina Jolly, Danushika Abeyrathna
{"title":"Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka","authors":"Stellina Jolly, Danushika Abeyrathna","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-12030004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sri Lanka and India are desirable surrogacy destinations for various reasons. Although surrogacy can generate greater foreign revenue, it raises ethical and legal difficulties. India enacted the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021 after decades of effort, whereas Sri Lanka continues with unregulated practice. This paper assesses to what extent Sri Lanka may learn from India. To that end, this paper investigates (i) the signifigance of Sri Lanka as a surrogacy destination and the surrounding ethical and legal issues; (ii) the legal validity and the legal framework governing surrogacy in Sri Lanka; (iii) the main characteristics of the legal landscape of surrogacy in India; and (iv) the adequacies and inadequacies of Indian legal approach to the surrogacy to determine the extent to which the Indian model can serve as a template for Sri Lanka. This paper concludes by proposing certain guiding principles for Sri Lanka in developing a legal framework for surrogacy.","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-12030004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Sri Lanka and India are desirable surrogacy destinations for various reasons. Although surrogacy can generate greater foreign revenue, it raises ethical and legal difficulties. India enacted the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021 after decades of effort, whereas Sri Lanka continues with unregulated practice. This paper assesses to what extent Sri Lanka may learn from India. To that end, this paper investigates (i) the signifigance of Sri Lanka as a surrogacy destination and the surrounding ethical and legal issues; (ii) the legal validity and the legal framework governing surrogacy in Sri Lanka; (iii) the main characteristics of the legal landscape of surrogacy in India; and (iv) the adequacies and inadequacies of Indian legal approach to the surrogacy to determine the extent to which the Indian model can serve as a template for Sri Lanka. This paper concludes by proposing certain guiding principles for Sri Lanka in developing a legal framework for surrogacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在印度和斯里兰卡规范代孕作为一种生殖实践
由于种种原因,斯里兰卡和印度是理想的代孕目的地。虽然代孕可以产生更多的外国收入,但它会带来道德和法律上的困难。经过几十年的努力,印度颁布了《2021年代孕(监管)法》,而斯里兰卡继续实行不受监管的做法。本文评估了斯里兰卡可以向印度学习到什么程度。为此,本文调查了(i)斯里兰卡作为代孕目的地的意义和周围的伦理和法律问题;(ii)斯里兰卡代孕的法律效力和法律框架;(iii)印度代孕法律格局的主要特点;(iv)印度代孕法律方法的不足和不足,以确定印度模式在多大程度上可以作为斯里兰卡的模板。本文最后提出了斯里兰卡在制定代孕法律框架方面的一些指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.
期刊最新文献
Access to Public Documents and Its Restrictions: a Reflection from the Perspectives of Brazil and Sweden Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka Use of Specialized Tribunals for the Settlement of Construction Projects in Times of a Financial Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1