Algebraic structures formalizing the logic with unsharp implication and negation

IF 0.6 4区 数学 Q2 LOGIC Logic Journal of the IGPL Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1093/jigpal/jzad023
Ivan Chajda, Helmut Länger
{"title":"Algebraic structures formalizing the logic with unsharp implication and negation","authors":"Ivan Chajda, Helmut Länger","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/jzad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It is well-known that intuitionistic logics can be formalized by means of Heyting algebras, i.e. relatively pseudocomplemented semilattices. Within such algebras the logical connectives implication and conjunction are formalized as the relative pseudocomplement and the semilattice operation meet, respectively. If the Heyting algebra has a bottom element $0$, then the relative pseudocomplement with respect to $0$ is called the pseudocomplement and it is considered as the connective negation in this logic. Our idea is to consider an arbitrary meet-semilattice with $0$ satisfying only the Ascending Chain Condition (these assumptions are trivially satisfied in finite meet-semilattices) and introduce the operators formalizing the connectives negation $x^{0}$ and implication $x\\rightarrow y$ as the set of all maximal elements $z$ satisfying $x\\wedge z=0$ and as the set of all maximal elements $z$ satisfying $x\\wedge z\\leq y$, respectively. Such a negation and implication is ‘unsharp’ since it assigns to one entry $x$ or to two entries $x$ and $y$ belonging to the semilattice, respectively, a subset instead of an element of the semilattice. Surprisingly, this kind of negation and implication still shares a number of properties of these connectives in intuitionistic logic, in particular the derivation rule Modus Ponens. Moreover, unsharp negation and unsharp implication can be characterized by means of five, respectively seven simple axioms. We present several examples. The concepts of a deductive system and of a filter are introduced as well as the congruence determined by such a filter. We finally describe certain relationships between these concepts.","PeriodicalId":51114,"journal":{"name":"Logic Journal of the IGPL","volume":"238 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic Journal of the IGPL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzad023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract It is well-known that intuitionistic logics can be formalized by means of Heyting algebras, i.e. relatively pseudocomplemented semilattices. Within such algebras the logical connectives implication and conjunction are formalized as the relative pseudocomplement and the semilattice operation meet, respectively. If the Heyting algebra has a bottom element $0$, then the relative pseudocomplement with respect to $0$ is called the pseudocomplement and it is considered as the connective negation in this logic. Our idea is to consider an arbitrary meet-semilattice with $0$ satisfying only the Ascending Chain Condition (these assumptions are trivially satisfied in finite meet-semilattices) and introduce the operators formalizing the connectives negation $x^{0}$ and implication $x\rightarrow y$ as the set of all maximal elements $z$ satisfying $x\wedge z=0$ and as the set of all maximal elements $z$ satisfying $x\wedge z\leq y$, respectively. Such a negation and implication is ‘unsharp’ since it assigns to one entry $x$ or to two entries $x$ and $y$ belonging to the semilattice, respectively, a subset instead of an element of the semilattice. Surprisingly, this kind of negation and implication still shares a number of properties of these connectives in intuitionistic logic, in particular the derivation rule Modus Ponens. Moreover, unsharp negation and unsharp implication can be characterized by means of five, respectively seven simple axioms. We present several examples. The concepts of a deductive system and of a filter are introduced as well as the congruence determined by such a filter. We finally describe certain relationships between these concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形式化逻辑的代数结构具有不明确的蕴涵和否定
摘要直观逻辑可以用Heyting代数,即相对伪补半格来形式化。在这些代数中,逻辑连接蕴涵和连接分别形式化为相对伪补和半格运算满足。如果Heyting代数有一个底元素$0$,则相对于$0$的伪补称为伪补,并将其视为该逻辑中的连接否定。我们的想法是考虑一个任意的满足半格,其中$0$只满足升链条件(这些假设在有限的满足半格中是平凡的),并引入将连接否定$x^{0}$和蕴涵$x\rightarrow y$形式化的运算符,分别作为满足$x\wedge z=0$的所有极大元素的集合$z$和满足$x\wedge z\leq y$的所有极大元素的集合$z$。这样的否定和暗示是“不尖锐的”,因为它分别将一个条目$x$或两个条目$x$和$y$分配给属于半格的一个子集,而不是半格的一个元素。令人惊讶的是,这种否定和蕴涵在直觉主义逻辑中仍然具有这些连接词的许多性质,特别是推导规则“模似命题”。不尖锐否定和不尖锐蕴涵可以分别用五个简单公理和七个简单公理来表征。我们举几个例子。引入了演绎系统和滤波器的概念,以及由这种滤波器确定的同余。我们最后描述了这些概念之间的某些关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logic Journal of the IGPL publishes papers in all areas of pure and applied logic, including pure logical systems, proof theory, model theory, recursion theory, type theory, nonclassical logics, nonmonotonic logic, numerical and uncertainty reasoning, logic and AI, foundations of logic programming, logic and computation, logic and language, and logic engineering. Logic Journal of the IGPL is published under licence from Professor Dov Gabbay as owner of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Using Multi-Objective Optimization to build non-Random Forest Virtual active power sensor for eolic self-consumption installations based on wind-related variables Detection of transiting exoplanets and phase-folding their host star’s light curves from K2 data with 1D-CNN Explanatory frameworks in complex change and resilience system modelling Inferential knowledge and epistemic dimensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1