Post-Growth, Degrowth, the Doughnut, and Circular Economy: A Short Guide for Policymakers

Federico Savini
{"title":"Post-Growth, Degrowth, the Doughnut, and Circular Economy: A Short Guide for Policymakers","authors":"Federico Savini","doi":"10.3138/jccpe-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities are searching for policy strategies able to meet climate and social targets while reducing their material footprint. To this end, post-growth approaches to urban sustainability have been rapidly gaining momentum. Rejecting the idea of green growth, the notion of post-growth includes a variety of agendas and approaches—for example, well-being economy, circular economy, degrowth, and doughnut economics. City officials, urban agencies, and policymakers recognize these terms as part of a same policy trend, one that focuses on the socio-ecological quality of urban development rather than its size. Yet, they often use them interchangeably and, in so doing, they risk making policy scenarios seem less incisive and inconsistent to the public. This commentary gives a guideline to the use of these terms in policy. It compares the terms of post-growth, degrowth, circular economy, and doughnut economics. It argues that post-growth is an approach, the doughnut is a tool, degrowth is an agenda, and circular economy is a business model. The article concludes with a manifesto for a post-growth city, a set of principles that can be used to build an urban post-growth policy strategy.","PeriodicalId":497723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities are searching for policy strategies able to meet climate and social targets while reducing their material footprint. To this end, post-growth approaches to urban sustainability have been rapidly gaining momentum. Rejecting the idea of green growth, the notion of post-growth includes a variety of agendas and approaches—for example, well-being economy, circular economy, degrowth, and doughnut economics. City officials, urban agencies, and policymakers recognize these terms as part of a same policy trend, one that focuses on the socio-ecological quality of urban development rather than its size. Yet, they often use them interchangeably and, in so doing, they risk making policy scenarios seem less incisive and inconsistent to the public. This commentary gives a guideline to the use of these terms in policy. It compares the terms of post-growth, degrowth, circular economy, and doughnut economics. It argues that post-growth is an approach, the doughnut is a tool, degrowth is an agenda, and circular economy is a business model. The article concludes with a manifesto for a post-growth city, a set of principles that can be used to build an urban post-growth policy strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后增长、去增长、甜甜圈和循环经济:给政策制定者的简短指南
城市正在寻找能够在减少物质足迹的同时满足气候和社会目标的政策策略。为此,针对城市可持续性的后增长方法正在迅速获得动力。后增长的概念摒弃了绿色增长的概念,包括各种议程和方法,例如福祉经济、循环经济、去增长和甜甜圈经济。城市官员、城市机构和政策制定者将这些术语视为同一政策趋势的一部分,即关注城市发展的社会生态质量,而不是其规模。然而,他们经常交替使用这两个词,这样做有可能使政策情景在公众看来不那么尖锐和不一致。这篇评注提供了在政策中使用这些术语的指南。它比较了后增长、去增长、循环经济和甜甜圈经济的术语。它认为后增长是一种方法,甜甜圈是一种工具,去增长是一项议程,循环经济是一种商业模式。文章最后提出了一份后增长城市的宣言,一套可用于制定城市后增长政策战略的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-Growth, Degrowth, the Doughnut, and Circular Economy: A Short Guide for Policymakers Cities Can Lead the Energy Employment Transition … but They Must Plan for It Implementing Mission-oriented Experiments: Recommendations on Epistemic Inclusion for City Stakeholders Working in Climate Change Initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1