{"title":"Decolonization and the History of Anthropology: The Implications of New Deal Anthropology from the 1930s to the 1950s","authors":"David W. Dinwoodie","doi":"10.1086/727076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a focus on the activities of Native Americans and anthropologists involved in the Indian New Deal between the 1930s and the 1950s, I show that Native Americans have long attended to and contributed to a global conversation about decolonization and that North American anthropologists have long worked to decolonize Native American peoples. The Indian New Deal engaged the language of decolonization and instituted policy reforms in service of self-determination for Native Americans. But the Indian New Deal exhibited the characteristic ambivalences of the global decolonization movement, representing an impulse toward self-determination, on the one hand, and neocolonialism, on the other. Anthropologists’ involvement in decolonization is thus complex, liberatory at times, paternalistic at others. To explore such important issues realistically, the history of anthropology needs to develop historiography to better situate practices of North American anthropologists within global history, including notably the global history of decolonization.","PeriodicalId":47258,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
With a focus on the activities of Native Americans and anthropologists involved in the Indian New Deal between the 1930s and the 1950s, I show that Native Americans have long attended to and contributed to a global conversation about decolonization and that North American anthropologists have long worked to decolonize Native American peoples. The Indian New Deal engaged the language of decolonization and instituted policy reforms in service of self-determination for Native Americans. But the Indian New Deal exhibited the characteristic ambivalences of the global decolonization movement, representing an impulse toward self-determination, on the one hand, and neocolonialism, on the other. Anthropologists’ involvement in decolonization is thus complex, liberatory at times, paternalistic at others. To explore such important issues realistically, the history of anthropology needs to develop historiography to better situate practices of North American anthropologists within global history, including notably the global history of decolonization.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Anthropological Research publishes diverse, high-quality, peer-reviewed articles on anthropological research of substance and broad significance, as well as about 100 timely book reviews annually. The journal reaches out to anthropologists of all specialties and theoretical perspectives both in the United States and around the world, with special emphasis given to the detailed presentation and rigorous analysis of field research. JAR''s articles are problem-oriented, theoretically contextualized, and of general interest; the journal does not publish short, purely descriptive reports.