Examining the Attributional Links Between Message Quality and Outcomes of Emotional Support Received on Facebook

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1080/10510974.2023.2269643
Emily M. Buehler, Andrew C. High, Rachael E. Bishop, Joshua D. Johnson, Daniel A. Lee, Amanda E. Lilly, Kelly Sweeney
{"title":"Examining the Attributional Links Between Message Quality and Outcomes of Emotional Support Received on Facebook","authors":"Emily M. Buehler, Andrew C. High, Rachael E. Bishop, Joshua D. Johnson, Daniel A. Lee, Amanda E. Lilly, Kelly Sweeney","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2269643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTFacebook users can receive high quality emotional support in response to their posts, but not all emotional support is of the same quality nor does it all benefit support receivers. Receivers’ perceptions of supportive messages influence the outcomes they experience. This study assessed support receivers’ attributions for the helpful support offered to them on Facebook to understand how their perceptions of the causes of that support may explain why some messages produce more beneficial outcomes than others. Participants (N = 147), who comprised predominantly white, female Facebook users in the United States, identified the most helpful comment on a recent support-seeking post on Facebook, rated the extent to which they made three types of attributions (dispositional, interpersonal, and medium) for the comment, and rated their corresponding emotional improvement. Raters coded the level of verbal person-centeredness (VPC) of each comment. Supportive messages with higher levels of VPC corresponded with more dispositional attributions and fewer medium attributions. Dispositional attributions also explained why the level of VPC of the most helpful comments was positively associated with emotional improvement.KEYWORDS: Supportive communicationattributionsverbal person-centerednessemotional improvementFacebook Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsEmily M. BuehlerEmily M. Buehler (Ph.D., University of Iowa) is an assistant professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University.Andrew C. HighAndrew C. High (Ph.D., The Pennsylvania State University) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University.Rachael E. BishopRachael E. Bishop is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University.Joshua D. JohnsonJoshua D. Johnson is a Ph.D. student in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University.Daniel A. LeeDaniel A. Lee is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University.Amanda E. LillyAmanda E. Lilly is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies & Philosophy at Utah State University.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2269643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTFacebook users can receive high quality emotional support in response to their posts, but not all emotional support is of the same quality nor does it all benefit support receivers. Receivers’ perceptions of supportive messages influence the outcomes they experience. This study assessed support receivers’ attributions for the helpful support offered to them on Facebook to understand how their perceptions of the causes of that support may explain why some messages produce more beneficial outcomes than others. Participants (N = 147), who comprised predominantly white, female Facebook users in the United States, identified the most helpful comment on a recent support-seeking post on Facebook, rated the extent to which they made three types of attributions (dispositional, interpersonal, and medium) for the comment, and rated their corresponding emotional improvement. Raters coded the level of verbal person-centeredness (VPC) of each comment. Supportive messages with higher levels of VPC corresponded with more dispositional attributions and fewer medium attributions. Dispositional attributions also explained why the level of VPC of the most helpful comments was positively associated with emotional improvement.KEYWORDS: Supportive communicationattributionsverbal person-centerednessemotional improvementFacebook Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsEmily M. BuehlerEmily M. Buehler (Ph.D., University of Iowa) is an assistant professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University.Andrew C. HighAndrew C. High (Ph.D., The Pennsylvania State University) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University.Rachael E. BishopRachael E. Bishop is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University.Joshua D. JohnsonJoshua D. Johnson is a Ph.D. student in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University.Daniel A. LeeDaniel A. Lee is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at The Pennsylvania State University.Amanda E. LillyAmanda E. Lilly is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies & Philosophy at Utah State University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究Facebook上的信息质量与情感支持结果之间的归因联系
摘要facebook用户可以获得高质量的情感支持,但并不是所有的情感支持都具有相同的质量,也不是所有的情感支持都有利于支持接受者。接受者对支持信息的感知影响他们所经历的结果。这项研究评估了支持接受者对他们在Facebook上获得的有益支持的归因,以了解他们对这种支持的原因的看法如何解释为什么一些信息比其他信息产生更有益的结果。参与者(N = 147)主要由美国的白人女性Facebook用户组成,他们在Facebook上找出了最近寻求支持的帖子中最有帮助的评论,对他们对评论的三种归因(性格、人际关系和媒介)的程度进行了评分,并对他们相应的情绪改善进行了评分。评分者对每条评论的口头以人为中心(VPC)水平进行编码。具有较高VPC水平的支持性信息对应较多的性格归因和较少的媒介归因。性格归因也解释了为什么最有帮助的评论的VPC水平与情绪改善呈正相关。关键词:支持性沟通归因言语以人为中心情绪改善facebook披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突作者简介:emily M. Buehler(爱荷华大学博士)是普渡大学Brian Lamb传播学院的助理教授。Andrew C. High,宾夕法尼亚州立大学博士,宾夕法尼亚州立大学传播艺术与科学系副教授。Rachael E. Bishop是宾夕法尼亚州立大学传播艺术与科学系的博士生。Joshua D. Johnson是普渡大学Brian Lamb传播学院的博士生。Daniel a . Lee是宾夕法尼亚州立大学传播艺术与科学系的博士候选人。Amanda E. Lilly是犹他州立大学传播研究与哲学系的助理教授。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Communicative Ecologies of Displaced Youth Ways of Connecting in Protracted Situations of Encampment Editorial for the Special Issue: “Communication Research on Coping Strategies During Global Crises” Mediated Contact with LGBTQ Characters: Associations Between Recognizability, Parasocial Friendship, Wishful Identification, and LGBTQ Prejudice Closing the Gaps: An Examination of Student Self-Sabotage, a Willingness to Ask for Help, and Personal-Enacted and Enacted-Relational Identity Gaps in the Student-Instructor Relationship Media Network and Citizen Journalism: The Transition from Agenda Setting to Agenda Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1