Business model innovation: Integrative review, framework, and agenda for future innovation management research

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Product Innovation Management Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1111/jpim.12704
Patrick Spieth, Pascal Breitenmoser, Tobias Röth
{"title":"Business model innovation: Integrative review, framework, and agenda for future innovation management research","authors":"Patrick Spieth, Pascal Breitenmoser, Tobias Röth","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The business model innovation (BMI) concept has become a well‐established phenomenon of current academic research. While Foss and Saebi's ( Journal of Management , 2017, 43, 200–227) seminal literature review on BMI revealed 349 articles on BMI published between 1972 and 2015, an additional number of 1727 articles on the topic have been published since 2016. In contrast to this overall interest in the BMI phenomenon, innovation‐focused journals include only a limited number of publications on BMI. Further, besides the valuable insights and fruitful research directions of extant literature reviews, they tend also to overlook the linkages between traditional innovation management and the majority of BMI research. Given this underrepresentation of BMI research in the innovation management literature, we conduct an integrative literature review to bring the disconnected literature closer together and offer directions for future research. Our literature review applies the review strategy of blending and merging the literature across domains. First, we blend the knowledge base of the BMI domain by applying the Product Development and Management Association (PDMA) Body of Knowledge categories. Second, we merge the literature across domains by developing an integrative framework. As recent BMI literature increasingly converged to two lines of research, our framework differentiates between the relatedness of the BMI and BMI openness. Thereby, we offer new avenues for future research that can enrich the dialogue on BMI research in the innovation management community. These results demonstrate how the BMI domain covers aspects that fit, contribute to, and extend classical innovation‐focused research, how both research domains can be merged to enrich each other, and how future research can foster the dialogue across disconnected domains.","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"875 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The business model innovation (BMI) concept has become a well‐established phenomenon of current academic research. While Foss and Saebi's ( Journal of Management , 2017, 43, 200–227) seminal literature review on BMI revealed 349 articles on BMI published between 1972 and 2015, an additional number of 1727 articles on the topic have been published since 2016. In contrast to this overall interest in the BMI phenomenon, innovation‐focused journals include only a limited number of publications on BMI. Further, besides the valuable insights and fruitful research directions of extant literature reviews, they tend also to overlook the linkages between traditional innovation management and the majority of BMI research. Given this underrepresentation of BMI research in the innovation management literature, we conduct an integrative literature review to bring the disconnected literature closer together and offer directions for future research. Our literature review applies the review strategy of blending and merging the literature across domains. First, we blend the knowledge base of the BMI domain by applying the Product Development and Management Association (PDMA) Body of Knowledge categories. Second, we merge the literature across domains by developing an integrative framework. As recent BMI literature increasingly converged to two lines of research, our framework differentiates between the relatedness of the BMI and BMI openness. Thereby, we offer new avenues for future research that can enrich the dialogue on BMI research in the innovation management community. These results demonstrate how the BMI domain covers aspects that fit, contribute to, and extend classical innovation‐focused research, how both research domains can be merged to enrich each other, and how future research can foster the dialogue across disconnected domains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业模式创新:未来创新管理研究的综合回顾、框架与议程
商业模式创新(BMI)概念已成为当前学术界研究的一个普遍现象。Foss和Saebi (Journal of Management, 2017, 43, 200-227)对BMI的开创性文献综述显示,1972年至2015年间发表了349篇关于BMI的文章,而自2016年以来,又发表了1727篇关于该主题的文章。与对BMI现象的整体兴趣相反,以创新为重点的期刊只包括有限数量的BMI出版物。此外,除了现有文献综述的宝贵见解和富有成果的研究方向外,它们还往往忽视了传统创新管理与大多数BMI研究之间的联系。鉴于BMI研究在创新管理文献中的代表性不足,我们进行了一项综合文献综述,将脱节的文献联系在一起,并为未来的研究提供方向。我们的文献综述采用了跨领域文献的混合和合并的综述策略。首先,我们通过应用PDMA (Product Development and Management Association)的Body of knowledge分类对BMI领域的知识库进行融合。其次,我们通过开发一个综合框架来合并跨领域的文献。由于最近的BMI文献越来越多地融合到两条研究线,我们的框架区分了BMI的相关性和BMI的开放性。因此,我们为未来的研究提供了新的途径,可以丰富创新管理界对BMI研究的对话。这些结果展示了BMI领域如何涵盖适合、促进和扩展以创新为重点的经典研究的各个方面,两个研究领域如何合并以丰富彼此,以及未来的研究如何促进跨不相关领域的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information From the editors: Passing the baton Service robots and innovation: An ecosystem approach Issue Information Fueling innovation management research: Future directions and five forward-looking paths
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1