Recent Developments in U.S. Climate Law: Judicial Retrenchment and Congressional Action

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Environmental Law Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1093/jel/eqac025
Daniel A Farber
{"title":"Recent Developments in U.S. Climate Law: Judicial Retrenchment and Congressional Action","authors":"Daniel A Farber","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqac025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The United States signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in June of 1992. For nearly 30 years thereafter, Congress remained gridlocked and unable to pass significant climate change legislation. During that time, the executive branch was the main forum for the development of federal climate policy, forcing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to creatively reinterpret 1970s legislation to deal with climate change. The situation changed in two crucial ways in 2022: The Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA reined in EPA’s authority, and Congress finally enacted major climate legislation in the form of a multi-billion dollar tax and spending bill. These two events will shape the future of US climate efforts.","PeriodicalId":46437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Law","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqac025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The United States signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in June of 1992. For nearly 30 years thereafter, Congress remained gridlocked and unable to pass significant climate change legislation. During that time, the executive branch was the main forum for the development of federal climate policy, forcing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to creatively reinterpret 1970s legislation to deal with climate change. The situation changed in two crucial ways in 2022: The Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA reined in EPA’s authority, and Congress finally enacted major climate legislation in the form of a multi-billion dollar tax and spending bill. These two events will shape the future of US climate efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国气候法的最新发展:司法紧缩和国会行动
美国于1992年6月签署了《联合国气候变化框架公约》。此后的近30年里,国会一直处于僵局,无法通过重大的气候变化立法。在此期间,行政部门是制定联邦气候政策的主要论坛,迫使环境保护署(EPA)创造性地重新解释1970年代的立法,以应对气候变化。2022年,情况在两个关键方面发生了变化:最高法院在西弗吉尼亚州诉美国环保署一案中的裁决限制了美国环保署的权力,国会最终以数十亿美元的税收和支出法案的形式颁布了重大的气候立法。这两件事将决定美国气候努力的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Condensing essential information into just three issues a year, the Journal of Environmental Law has become an authoritative source of informed analysis for all those who have any dealings in this vital field of legal study. It exists primarily for academics and legal practitioners, but should also prove accessible for all other groups concerned with the environment, from scientists to planners. The journal offers major articles on a wide variety of topics, refereed and written to the highest standards, providing innovative and authoritative appraisals of current and emerging concepts, policies, and practice. It includes: -An analysis section, providing detailed analysis of current case law and legislative and policy developments -An annual review of significant UK, European Court of Justice, and international law cases -A substantial book reviews section
期刊最新文献
Environmental Challenges to UK Public Authorities: The Impact of the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 The Obligations of the States in Respect of Climate Change Before the International Court of Justice Uncharted Interplay and Troubled Implementation: Managing Hydropower’s Environmental Impacts under the EU Water Framework and Environmental Liability Directives Protecting the Habitats of Endangered Species Through Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China: Lessons Learned from Peafowl Versus the Dam ClientEarth v Shell plc and the (Un)Suitability of UK Company Law and Litigation to Pursue Climate-Related Goals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1