Screen Scraping in Australian Finance

Ross P. Buckley, Natalia Jevglevskaja
{"title":"Screen Scraping in Australian Finance","authors":"Ross P. Buckley, Natalia Jevglevskaja","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v42i2.7193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Millions of Australians give their online banking credentials to third parties so as to gain access to financial products and services enabled by the analysis of the data in their bank accounts. Screen Scraping (‘SS’) has contributed significantly to the rise of the FinTech industry. While the risks SS entails are significant, nowhere has the practice been formally outlawed despite the availability of safer data transfer arrangements under Open Banking regimes. We examine approaches to SS in the EU, the UK, and Australia and argue the practice should be prohibited here. Such a ban would have two salutary effects. It would protect consumers in financial hardship who use payday loans and it would accelerate uptake of the Consumer Data Right.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Queensland law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v42i2.7193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Millions of Australians give their online banking credentials to third parties so as to gain access to financial products and services enabled by the analysis of the data in their bank accounts. Screen Scraping (‘SS’) has contributed significantly to the rise of the FinTech industry. While the risks SS entails are significant, nowhere has the practice been formally outlawed despite the availability of safer data transfer arrangements under Open Banking regimes. We examine approaches to SS in the EU, the UK, and Australia and argue the practice should be prohibited here. Such a ban would have two salutary effects. It would protect consumers in financial hardship who use payday loans and it would accelerate uptake of the Consumer Data Right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚金融的屏幕抓取
数以百万计的澳大利亚人将他们的网上银行凭证提供给第三方,以便通过分析他们银行账户中的数据获得金融产品和服务。屏幕抓取(“SS”)对金融科技行业的崛起做出了重大贡献。虽然SS带来的风险很大,但尽管在开放银行制度下有更安全的数据传输安排,但这种做法还没有被正式禁止。我们研究了欧盟、英国和澳大利亚的SS方法,并认为这种做法应该在这里被禁止。这样的禁令将产生两种有益的影响。它将保护那些在经济困难中使用发薪日贷款的消费者,并将加速消费者数据权的普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robodebt and Novel Data Technologies in the Public Sector The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions Regulating Decisions that Lead to Loss of Life in Workplaces Lending on the Edge Substantive Equality and the Possibilities of the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1