Fiscal Patriotism of Billionaires as Social Solidarity

Volodymyr L. Andrushchenko
{"title":"Fiscal Patriotism of Billionaires as Social Solidarity","authors":"Volodymyr L. Andrushchenko","doi":"10.32983/2222-4459-2023-8-211-216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxation of the rich and wealth are among the hot topics of public interest. Using specific examples, the article highlights the latest initiative of a group of American multimillionaires to increase the level of tax rates for this super-rich category of taxpayers. Such an initiative can be considered a solidarity tax. Accordingly, the task was set to characterize the quantitative indicators of this initiative. The article is motivated by the striking fact that 400 American multi-billionaires possess a combined wealth worth 4.000 billion U. S. dollars! The role of the method of studying the problem was performed by the analysis of quantitative parameters and fiscal and administrative features of taxation of the rich. First of all, the results of the study consist in the interpretation of the multi-component concept of wealth as an object of taxation. The impossibility of a general income and property tax has been disclosed, such a tax exists only as an unrealized project. The fiscal and administrative reasons for the refusal of inheritance tax in 21 countries, including Austria, Canada, Sweden and Israel, are clarified. The arguments that property taxes harm the processes of creation of wealth and capital are presented, in connection with which in the United States the share of property taxes in the total amount of tax revenues has decreased from 42% to 14% compared to the beginning of the twentieth century. The most significant fiscal potential for strengthening taxation of the rich is found in taxes on income and profits. A quantitative and institutional analysis of existing wealth taxes in Norway and Switzerland is carried out. A serious fiscal-administrative problem with wealth taxes is the valuation of taxable assets. As for further research, wealth taxes have inexhaustible scientific and practical potential. The article substantiates the relevance of research on similar topics in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":53291,"journal":{"name":"Biznes Inform","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biznes Inform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-8-211-216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxation of the rich and wealth are among the hot topics of public interest. Using specific examples, the article highlights the latest initiative of a group of American multimillionaires to increase the level of tax rates for this super-rich category of taxpayers. Such an initiative can be considered a solidarity tax. Accordingly, the task was set to characterize the quantitative indicators of this initiative. The article is motivated by the striking fact that 400 American multi-billionaires possess a combined wealth worth 4.000 billion U. S. dollars! The role of the method of studying the problem was performed by the analysis of quantitative parameters and fiscal and administrative features of taxation of the rich. First of all, the results of the study consist in the interpretation of the multi-component concept of wealth as an object of taxation. The impossibility of a general income and property tax has been disclosed, such a tax exists only as an unrealized project. The fiscal and administrative reasons for the refusal of inheritance tax in 21 countries, including Austria, Canada, Sweden and Israel, are clarified. The arguments that property taxes harm the processes of creation of wealth and capital are presented, in connection with which in the United States the share of property taxes in the total amount of tax revenues has decreased from 42% to 14% compared to the beginning of the twentieth century. The most significant fiscal potential for strengthening taxation of the rich is found in taxes on income and profits. A quantitative and institutional analysis of existing wealth taxes in Norway and Switzerland is carried out. A serious fiscal-administrative problem with wealth taxes is the valuation of taxable assets. As for further research, wealth taxes have inexhaustible scientific and practical potential. The article substantiates the relevance of research on similar topics in Ukraine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亿万富翁的财政爱国主义作为社会团结
对富人和富人征税是公众关注的热点话题之一。文章通过具体的例子,强调了一群美国千万富翁的最新举措,即提高这类超级富豪纳税人的税率。这种倡议可以被视为团结税。因此,任务是确定这一倡议的数量指标的特征。这篇文章的动机是一个惊人的事实,即400名美国亿万富翁拥有价值4万亿美元的财富!研究问题的方法的作用是通过分析富人税收的定量参数和财政和行政特征来实现的。首先,研究结果包括对财富作为征税对象的多成分概念的解释。普遍征收所得税和财产税的不可能性已经被揭露,这种税只是作为一个未实现的项目而存在。对奥地利、加拿大、瑞典、以色列等21个国家拒绝征收继承税的财政、行政理由进行了分析。财产税损害财富和资本创造过程的论点被提出,与此相关的是,在美国,财产税在税收总额中的份额与20世纪初相比已从42%下降到14%。加强对富人征税的最重要的财政潜力是对收入和利润征税。对挪威和瑞士现有的财富税进行了数量和制度分析。财产税的一个严重的财政管理问题是应税资产的估值。至于进一步的研究,财富税具有取之不尽的科学和实践潜力。文章证实了乌克兰类似课题研究的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digital Marketing: The Current State and Prospects for Development in Ukraine International Reserves: The Experience of Ukraine and Poland The Global Experience of Setting up and Developing a System of Public Administration of Digitization Processes: The Institutional Basis and Resource Provision European Experience in the Formation and Implementation of Youth Policy in the Context of Social Protection, Youth Development, and Preservation of Human Potential Behavioral Economics in the Implementation of Social Initiatives on the Example of Eco-Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1