Effects of Affect and Message Framing on Responses to Charity Advertising: A Construal Level and Regulatory Focus Perspective

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1080/10510974.2023.2266873
George Anghelcev, Sela Sar, Yan Huang
{"title":"Effects of Affect and Message Framing on Responses to Charity Advertising: A Construal Level and Regulatory Focus Perspective","authors":"George Anghelcev, Sela Sar, Yan Huang","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2266873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCharitable donation appeals can be framed to highlight the attainment of desirable outcomes (promotion framing) or the avoidance of undesirable situations (prevention framing). Drawing from regulatory focus theory, construal level theory, and the linguistic categorization model, this study reveals how the impact of the two messages frames can be influenced by the emotional state of the message recipient. Participants had more favorable attitudes toward charity advertisements, were more likely to donate to a food bank, and placed more value on donating when charity ads highlighted desirable end-states, but only if they were in a positive mood. In a negative mood, participants responded better to charity ads that described how donations could be used to avoid undesirable situations. Analysis showed these effects might occur because people process information differently under the two mood conditions and the two message frames trigger different motivational mind-sets.KEYWORDS: Moodmessage framingcharity advertisingregulatory focus theorypromotion – preventionconstrual level theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGeorge AnghelcevGeorge Anghelcev is Professor of Strategic Communication in the Journalism and Strategic Communication Department at Northwestern University in Qatar.Sela SarSela Sar is Professor of Advertising in the Charles H. Sandage Department of Advertising at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Yan HuangYan Huang is Assistant Professor of Integrated Strategic Communication in the Jack J. Valenti School of Communication at the University of Houston.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2266873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTCharitable donation appeals can be framed to highlight the attainment of desirable outcomes (promotion framing) or the avoidance of undesirable situations (prevention framing). Drawing from regulatory focus theory, construal level theory, and the linguistic categorization model, this study reveals how the impact of the two messages frames can be influenced by the emotional state of the message recipient. Participants had more favorable attitudes toward charity advertisements, were more likely to donate to a food bank, and placed more value on donating when charity ads highlighted desirable end-states, but only if they were in a positive mood. In a negative mood, participants responded better to charity ads that described how donations could be used to avoid undesirable situations. Analysis showed these effects might occur because people process information differently under the two mood conditions and the two message frames trigger different motivational mind-sets.KEYWORDS: Moodmessage framingcharity advertisingregulatory focus theorypromotion – preventionconstrual level theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGeorge AnghelcevGeorge Anghelcev is Professor of Strategic Communication in the Journalism and Strategic Communication Department at Northwestern University in Qatar.Sela SarSela Sar is Professor of Advertising in the Charles H. Sandage Department of Advertising at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Yan HuangYan Huang is Assistant Professor of Integrated Strategic Communication in the Jack J. Valenti School of Communication at the University of Houston.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感和信息框架对慈善广告反应的影响:一个解释水平和监管焦点的视角
【摘要】慈善捐赠呼吁可以通过强调达到理想结果的框架(促进框架)或避免不理想情况的框架(预防框架)来构建。本研究从调节焦点理论、解释水平理论和语言分类模型出发,揭示了两种信息框架的影响如何受到信息接受者情绪状态的影响。参与者对慈善广告的态度更积极,更有可能向食品银行捐款,当慈善广告强调理想的最终状态时,他们更重视捐赠,但前提是他们情绪积极。在消极情绪下,参与者对描述如何使用捐款来避免不良情况的慈善广告反应更好。分析表明,这些影响可能是因为人们在两种情绪条件下处理信息的方式不同,两种信息框架引发了不同的动机思维模式。关键词:情绪信息框架慈善广告监管焦点理论促进-预防解释层次理论披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。作者george Anghelcev是卡塔尔西北大学新闻与战略传播系的战略传播教授。Sela Sar是伊利诺伊大学香槟分校查尔斯·h·桑德奇广告系的广告教授。黄燕,休斯顿大学杰克J.瓦伦蒂传播学院综合战略传播助理教授。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Communicative Ecologies of Displaced Youth Ways of Connecting in Protracted Situations of Encampment Editorial for the Special Issue: “Communication Research on Coping Strategies During Global Crises” Mediated Contact with LGBTQ Characters: Associations Between Recognizability, Parasocial Friendship, Wishful Identification, and LGBTQ Prejudice Closing the Gaps: An Examination of Student Self-Sabotage, a Willingness to Ask for Help, and Personal-Enacted and Enacted-Relational Identity Gaps in the Student-Instructor Relationship Media Network and Citizen Journalism: The Transition from Agenda Setting to Agenda Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1