Conservation Policy, Indigeneity, and Changing Traditional Hunting Practices in West Papua

IF 1.7 Q2 FORESTRY Forest and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-24 DOI:10.24259/fs.v7i2.27420
Sepus M. Fatem, Yubelince Y. Runtuboi, Micah R. Fisher, Yafed Sufi, Ahmad Maryudi, Nurhady Sirimorok
{"title":"Conservation Policy, Indigeneity, and Changing Traditional Hunting Practices in West Papua","authors":"Sepus M. Fatem, Yubelince Y. Runtuboi, Micah R. Fisher, Yafed Sufi, Ahmad Maryudi, Nurhady Sirimorok","doi":"10.24259/fs.v7i2.27420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional governments are increasingly developing conservation policy initiatives that are framed alongside the empowerment of Indigenous Peoples. This paper examines the case of Tambrauw, West Papua, that set out to establish one of the first ever Conservation Regencies in Indonesia. To understand the implications of conservation policy developments, we explored from an environmental justice perspective the ways that one of the most important forest-based activities of local communities – hunting – has changed in recent years. Data was collected using qualitative methods of participatory observation and interviews between 2015-2018 across three Tambrauw districts. The study shows how policy changes are increasing clashes between local hunters and conservation officials. This has implications for broader issues of conservation policy and local livelihoods, and sheds light on the more recent trend of foregrounding Indigenous identity in forest management. Although on the face of it the emergence of conservation regencies represents a trend in downscaling authority to empower local communities, findings shows that place-based and more locally responsive policies need to be established to address emerging conflicts that can also meet broader conservation outcomes.","PeriodicalId":43213,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Society","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i2.27420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional governments are increasingly developing conservation policy initiatives that are framed alongside the empowerment of Indigenous Peoples. This paper examines the case of Tambrauw, West Papua, that set out to establish one of the first ever Conservation Regencies in Indonesia. To understand the implications of conservation policy developments, we explored from an environmental justice perspective the ways that one of the most important forest-based activities of local communities – hunting – has changed in recent years. Data was collected using qualitative methods of participatory observation and interviews between 2015-2018 across three Tambrauw districts. The study shows how policy changes are increasing clashes between local hunters and conservation officials. This has implications for broader issues of conservation policy and local livelihoods, and sheds light on the more recent trend of foregrounding Indigenous identity in forest management. Although on the face of it the emergence of conservation regencies represents a trend in downscaling authority to empower local communities, findings shows that place-based and more locally responsive policies need to be established to address emerging conflicts that can also meet broader conservation outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西巴布亚的保护政策、土著和改变传统狩猎行为
地方政府正在越来越多地制定保护政策倡议,同时赋予土著人民权力。本文考察了西巴布亚省Tambrauw的案例,该案例着手建立印度尼西亚有史以来第一个保护区之一。为了理解保护政策发展的影响,我们从环境正义的角度探讨了近年来当地社区最重要的森林活动之一-狩猎-的变化方式。2015-2018年间,采用参与式观察和访谈的定性方法收集了坦布劳三个地区的数据。这项研究表明,政策变化如何加剧了当地猎人和保护官员之间的冲突。这对保护政策和当地生计等更广泛的问题产生了影响,并揭示了最近在森林管理中突出土著身份的趋势。虽然从表面上看,保护区的出现代表了权力下放的趋势,以赋予当地社区权力,但研究结果表明,需要建立基于地方的、更符合当地需求的政策,以解决新出现的冲突,同时也能实现更广泛的保护成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest and Society
Forest and Society FORESTRY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
35.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Good Life: Agriculture Transformation and the Pursuance of Goals in Two Rural Villages of Northeastern Thailand Emergent Institutional Issues from New Tenure Reforms and Social-Forestry Initiatives in Indonesia: Notes from The Field Fish, Freshwater, and the Promise of Biodiversity History for Indonesian Studies Placing the Commoning First: Getting Beyond the Patronage Trap in Natural Resource Decentralization Policies Assessing Indigenous Forest Management in Mount Merapi National Park Based on Ostrom’s Design Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1