”Um, Diversity Definition…that’s Hard:” Student Communication About Diversity in the Classroom and Beyond

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1080/10510974.2023.2274133
Amanda Arp, Stacy Tye-Williams, Philip B. Gallagher
{"title":"”Um, Diversity Definition…that’s Hard:” Student Communication About Diversity in the Classroom and Beyond","authors":"Amanda Arp, Stacy Tye-Williams, Philip B. Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2274133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAfter the civil rights movement, affirmative action drove discussions of diversity on college campuses in the United States. Stakeholders of affirmative action saw that diversity for diversity’s sake was not enough to justify programs and policies at academic institutions. Typically, discussions of policies and classroom inclusion strategies have been driven by faculty and institutions treating students as beneficiaries of these policies and strategies, but they are often not consulted and their perspectives are not included in instruction and policy development. This study explores student communication about diversity because the US is at a cultural-crossroads where racial, ethnic, religious, sexual orientation, gender, and disability diversity are under political pressure. From these voices, we discovered a struggle with defining diversity, conflict over labeling a campus as diverse, minimizing experiences of discrimination and bias, and a need for visible administrative support of diversity and inclusion. The results of this study provide insight into how we can improve communication about diversity on campus and beyond.KEYWORDS: Diversityinclusioncommunicationstudentsinstruction AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge Mariah Kemp for her contributions to this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAmanda ArpAmanda Arp (Ph.D., Iowa State University) is an Assistant Professor of English, Rhetoric & Composition and the Director of the Writing Center at Central Methodist University. Her research focuses on fat rhetoric and writing center practices.Stacy Tye-WilliamsStacy Tye-Williams (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is an Associate Professor of Communication Studies/English at Iowa State University. Her research focuses on workplace bullying and harassment.Philip B. GallagherPhilip B. Gallagher (Ph.D., Iowa State University) is an Assistant Professor of Technical Communication at Mercer University. His research focuses on ADA compliance, accessibility, and user-centered design.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"8 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2274133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTAfter the civil rights movement, affirmative action drove discussions of diversity on college campuses in the United States. Stakeholders of affirmative action saw that diversity for diversity’s sake was not enough to justify programs and policies at academic institutions. Typically, discussions of policies and classroom inclusion strategies have been driven by faculty and institutions treating students as beneficiaries of these policies and strategies, but they are often not consulted and their perspectives are not included in instruction and policy development. This study explores student communication about diversity because the US is at a cultural-crossroads where racial, ethnic, religious, sexual orientation, gender, and disability diversity are under political pressure. From these voices, we discovered a struggle with defining diversity, conflict over labeling a campus as diverse, minimizing experiences of discrimination and bias, and a need for visible administrative support of diversity and inclusion. The results of this study provide insight into how we can improve communication about diversity on campus and beyond.KEYWORDS: Diversityinclusioncommunicationstudentsinstruction AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge Mariah Kemp for her contributions to this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAmanda ArpAmanda Arp (Ph.D., Iowa State University) is an Assistant Professor of English, Rhetoric & Composition and the Director of the Writing Center at Central Methodist University. Her research focuses on fat rhetoric and writing center practices.Stacy Tye-WilliamsStacy Tye-Williams (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is an Associate Professor of Communication Studies/English at Iowa State University. Her research focuses on workplace bullying and harassment.Philip B. GallagherPhilip B. Gallagher (Ph.D., Iowa State University) is an Assistant Professor of Technical Communication at Mercer University. His research focuses on ADA compliance, accessibility, and user-centered design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“嗯,多样性定义……这很难:”学生在课堂内外关于多样性的交流
【摘要】民权运动之后,平权行动推动了美国大学校园中关于多样性的讨论。平权行动的利益相关者认为,为多样性而多样性不足以证明学术机构的项目和政策是合理的。通常,政策和课堂包容策略的讨论是由教师和机构推动的,他们将学生视为这些政策和策略的受益者,但往往没有征求他们的意见,他们的观点也没有包括在教学和政策制定中。由于美国处于种族、民族、宗教、性取向、性别和残疾多样性面临政治压力的文化十字路口,本研究探讨了学生关于多样性的交流。从这些声音中,我们发现了定义多样性的斗争,为校园贴上多样性标签的冲突,最大限度地减少歧视和偏见的经历,以及对多样性和包容性的可见行政支持的需要。这项研究的结果为我们如何在校园内外改善关于多样性的沟通提供了见解。关键词:多样性、包容性、沟通、学生指导感谢我们感谢Mariah Kemp对这个项目的贡献。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。萨曼达·阿尔普(爱荷华州立大学博士)是中央卫理公会大学英语、修辞与写作助理教授和写作中心主任。她的研究主要集中在肥胖修辞和写作中心的做法。Stacy Tye-Williams(博士,内布拉斯加州大学林肯分校)是爱荷华州立大学传播研究/英语副教授。她的研究重点是职场欺凌和骚扰。Philip B. Gallagher(爱荷华州立大学博士)是美世大学技术传播助理教授。他的研究重点是ADA的遵从性、可访问性和以用户为中心的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Communicative Ecologies of Displaced Youth Ways of Connecting in Protracted Situations of Encampment Editorial for the Special Issue: “Communication Research on Coping Strategies During Global Crises” Mediated Contact with LGBTQ Characters: Associations Between Recognizability, Parasocial Friendship, Wishful Identification, and LGBTQ Prejudice Closing the Gaps: An Examination of Student Self-Sabotage, a Willingness to Ask for Help, and Personal-Enacted and Enacted-Relational Identity Gaps in the Student-Instructor Relationship Media Network and Citizen Journalism: The Transition from Agenda Setting to Agenda Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1