Between settlement, double return and re-emigration: motivations for future mobility of Polish and Lithuanian return migrants

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1186/s40878-023-00350-3
Olga Czeranowska, Violetta Parutis, Agnieszka Trąbka
{"title":"Between settlement, double return and re-emigration: motivations for future mobility of Polish and Lithuanian return migrants","authors":"Olga Czeranowska, Violetta Parutis, Agnieszka Trąbka","doi":"10.1186/s40878-023-00350-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although research on return migration is growing, little is known about returnees’ plans and attitudes regarding further migration. This article contributes to the filling of this knowledge gap by studying the likelihood of engaging in further mobility among Polish and Lithuanian returnees. Using a mixed method approach we explore under which circumstances return migrants intent to stay in their country of origin permanently and what factors would make them consider leaving again. Our quantitative sample (CAWI survey) consists of 740 responses from Poles and Lithuanians who returned to their home countries from the UK. We conducted a binary logistic regression analysis concerning plans to move abroad again. In the qualitative part of the analysis, based on in-depth interviews with 60 Polish or Lithuanian returnees, we have contextualised quantitative results by presenting four case studies representing different likelihoods of re-migrating. Our research shows that both return and post-return plans are always negotiated in the context of a variety of personal, family and professional considerations. Having a job, having children and strong attachment to the current place of living turned out to be the strongest negative predictors of the likelihood of further migration.","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00350-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although research on return migration is growing, little is known about returnees’ plans and attitudes regarding further migration. This article contributes to the filling of this knowledge gap by studying the likelihood of engaging in further mobility among Polish and Lithuanian returnees. Using a mixed method approach we explore under which circumstances return migrants intent to stay in their country of origin permanently and what factors would make them consider leaving again. Our quantitative sample (CAWI survey) consists of 740 responses from Poles and Lithuanians who returned to their home countries from the UK. We conducted a binary logistic regression analysis concerning plans to move abroad again. In the qualitative part of the analysis, based on in-depth interviews with 60 Polish or Lithuanian returnees, we have contextualised quantitative results by presenting four case studies representing different likelihoods of re-migrating. Our research shows that both return and post-return plans are always negotiated in the context of a variety of personal, family and professional considerations. Having a job, having children and strong attachment to the current place of living turned out to be the strongest negative predictors of the likelihood of further migration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在定居、双重返回和再移民之间:波兰和立陶宛返回移民未来流动的动机
虽然关于返乡移民的研究越来越多,但对返乡移民的计划和态度却知之甚少。本文通过研究波兰和立陶宛回返者之间进一步流动的可能性,有助于填补这一知识空白。使用混合方法,我们探索在何种情况下移民打算永久留在原籍国,以及哪些因素会使他们考虑再次离开。我们的定量样本(CAWI调查)包括从英国返回祖国的波兰人和立陶宛人的740份回复。我们对再次移居国外的计划进行了二元逻辑回归分析。在定性分析部分,基于对60名波兰或立陶宛回返者的深入访谈,我们通过提出代表不同再移民可能性的四个案例研究,将定量结果置于背景中。我们的研究表明,回国和回国后的计划总是在各种个人、家庭和职业考虑的背景下进行谈判。有工作、有孩子和对当前居住地的强烈依恋被证明是进一步移民可能性的最强负面预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Standardised integration requirements for naturalisation: less rights and less discretion? A qualitative meta-analysis of ethnographic studies of naturalisation procedures in Europe Who are the immigrants that Israeli Jews prefer? The interplay between reasons for migration, religion, and religiosity Saving behavior among immigrant and native youth De-migranticizing as methodology: rethinking migration studies through immobility and liminality Ambiguous citizenship policies: Examining implementation gaps across levels of legislation in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1