The perfectionism principle in the representation of corporate achievements (based on the annual reports’ material of industrial companies)

Yu. A. Filyasova
{"title":"The perfectionism principle in the representation of corporate achievements (based on the annual reports’ material of industrial companies)","authors":"Yu. A. Filyasova","doi":"10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-3-97-108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the verbal representation elements of perfectionism in annual reports. The study is intended to analyze the perfectionist principle as an integral annual reports’ characteristic of companies with high rating positions. The material for the research consisted of 2.882 contextual uses of keywords with the superlative semantics – “best”, “maximum”, “high”, as well as those with the meaning of progressive development – “increase”, “improvement”, “upgrading”, “growth”, which reflect the semantics of the concept “perfectionism” and characterize the companies’ own activity. The research was conducted with the following methods: continuous sampling in the reports’ documents on the listed keywords, semantic selection, quantitative analysis, contextual analysis, semantic classification, data comparison. On average the coefficient of the presence of perfectionism elements in the volume of annual reports varies from 0.66 to 2.15. The data obtained can be considered high, given that many report pages contain numerical and illustrative data. Among the studied contextual uses, the most frequent were words with broader semantics: “increase”, “high”, “best”, “increase”, which can be used both from the standpoint of performance and from the point of view of the process of performing production activities. The usage of the keywords has a systemic character as it embraces all types of companies’ activities: the increase of the ecological and corporate social responsibility levels; business process improvement; product quality enhancement; the board of directors’ activity improvement, the increase in profits and company value, and some others. The perfectionism principle is oriented to maintaining long-term relationships with external and internal categories of users by ensuring that the performance of activities meets the expectations of interested groups of users.","PeriodicalId":33117,"journal":{"name":"Upravlenie","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-3-97-108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the verbal representation elements of perfectionism in annual reports. The study is intended to analyze the perfectionist principle as an integral annual reports’ characteristic of companies with high rating positions. The material for the research consisted of 2.882 contextual uses of keywords with the superlative semantics – “best”, “maximum”, “high”, as well as those with the meaning of progressive development – “increase”, “improvement”, “upgrading”, “growth”, which reflect the semantics of the concept “perfectionism” and characterize the companies’ own activity. The research was conducted with the following methods: continuous sampling in the reports’ documents on the listed keywords, semantic selection, quantitative analysis, contextual analysis, semantic classification, data comparison. On average the coefficient of the presence of perfectionism elements in the volume of annual reports varies from 0.66 to 2.15. The data obtained can be considered high, given that many report pages contain numerical and illustrative data. Among the studied contextual uses, the most frequent were words with broader semantics: “increase”, “high”, “best”, “increase”, which can be used both from the standpoint of performance and from the point of view of the process of performing production activities. The usage of the keywords has a systemic character as it embraces all types of companies’ activities: the increase of the ecological and corporate social responsibility levels; business process improvement; product quality enhancement; the board of directors’ activity improvement, the increase in profits and company value, and some others. The perfectionism principle is oriented to maintaining long-term relationships with external and internal categories of users by ensuring that the performance of activities meets the expectations of interested groups of users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业业绩表现中的完美主义原则(基于工业企业年报材料)
本文研究了年度报告中完美主义的语言表征因素。本研究旨在分析完美主义原则作为高评级公司年报的整体特征。研究材料包括2.882个具有最高级语义的关键词——“最佳”、“最大”、“高”,以及具有渐进式发展意义的关键词——“增加”、“改进”、“升级”、“增长”,这些关键词反映了“完美主义”概念的语义,并具有公司自身活动的特征。研究采用以下方法:对所列关键词进行连续抽样、语义选择、定量分析、语境分析、语义分类、数据比较。平均而言,年度报告数量中完美主义因素存在的系数从0.66到2.15不等。获得的数据可以被认为是高的,因为许多报告页面包含数值和说明性数据。在研究的语境用法中,最常见的是具有更广泛语义的词:“增加”、“高”、“最好”、“增加”,这些词既可以从性能的角度使用,也可以从执行生产活动的过程的角度使用。关键词的使用具有系统性,因为它涵盖了公司所有类型的活动:生态和企业社会责任水平的提高;业务流程改进;提高产品质量;董事会活动的改善,利润和公司价值的增加等等。完美主义原则旨在通过确保活动的表现符合感兴趣的用户群体的期望,来维持与外部和内部用户类别的长期关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
East and West: global technological confrontation Prospects for the development of the domestic hotel business and personnel training Machine-tool industry retrospective analysis in member countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States Historical approaches, effective solutions and promising developments of the national school of management for the mobilization of ecosystem potential Features and challenges of the modern labor market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1