Are Basel-III norms good for Indian banks? Examining performance, efficiency and resilience variance in private-sector and public-sector banks

Megha Jaiwani, Santosh Gopalkrishnan
{"title":"Are Basel-III norms good for Indian banks? Examining performance, efficiency and resilience variance in private-sector and public-sector banks","authors":"Megha Jaiwani, Santosh Gopalkrishnan","doi":"10.1108/jeas-05-2023-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The study examines whether the Basel-III regulations impact the financial performance, operational efficiency and resilience of Indian banks. Further, the study tests whether there is a variance in the impact between private- and public-sector banks. Design/methodology/approach The study uses panel data regression on data from 16 private- and 12 public-sector banks from the years 2016–2022. Random-effect estimation is used, and robust standard errors are calculated. Findings The main findings indicate that the Basel-III regulations related to capital and leverage boost public-sector banks' financial performance and resilience. However, a similar impact is not detected in the case of private-sector banks. Practical implications The findings signify that the Basel-III framework does not address the differences between public and private-sector banks. Therefore, the policy implications are of practical importance and indicate that Basel-III regulations should not be considered a one-size-fits-all type of bank. Instead, policymakers should consider the structural differences between private and public-sector banks concerning Basel-III regulations. Originality/value The study addresses a significant limitation of the Basel-III regulations, which, in their current state, somehow fail to account for the differences between the public- and private-sector banks.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-05-2023-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The study examines whether the Basel-III regulations impact the financial performance, operational efficiency and resilience of Indian banks. Further, the study tests whether there is a variance in the impact between private- and public-sector banks. Design/methodology/approach The study uses panel data regression on data from 16 private- and 12 public-sector banks from the years 2016–2022. Random-effect estimation is used, and robust standard errors are calculated. Findings The main findings indicate that the Basel-III regulations related to capital and leverage boost public-sector banks' financial performance and resilience. However, a similar impact is not detected in the case of private-sector banks. Practical implications The findings signify that the Basel-III framework does not address the differences between public and private-sector banks. Therefore, the policy implications are of practical importance and indicate that Basel-III regulations should not be considered a one-size-fits-all type of bank. Instead, policymakers should consider the structural differences between private and public-sector banks concerning Basel-III regulations. Originality/value The study addresses a significant limitation of the Basel-III regulations, which, in their current state, somehow fail to account for the differences between the public- and private-sector banks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴塞尔协议iii对印度银行有利吗?考察私营部门和公共部门银行的绩效、效率和弹性差异
本研究考察了巴塞尔iii法规是否会影响印度银行的财务绩效、运营效率和弹性。此外,该研究还测试了私营银行和公共银行之间的影响是否存在差异。该研究对2016-2022年间16家私营银行和12家公共银行的数据进行了面板数据回归。采用随机效应估计,计算鲁棒标准误差。主要研究结果表明,与资本和杠杆相关的巴塞尔iii法规提高了公共部门银行的财务绩效和抗风险能力。然而,在私营银行的情况下,没有发现类似的影响。研究结果表明,巴塞尔协议iii框架没有解决公共银行和私营银行之间的差异。因此,政策含义具有实际重要性,并表明巴塞尔iii法规不应被视为一刀切的银行类型。相反,政策制定者应该考虑私人银行和公共银行在巴塞尔协议iii监管方面的结构性差异。该研究解决了巴塞尔协议iii规定的一个重大局限性,即在目前的状态下,该规定在某种程度上未能考虑到公共银行和私营银行之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
期刊最新文献
Understanding the impact of ethical leadership on followers' voice: mediation of moral identity and moderation of proactive personality Do agency costs and business risk affect the corporate sustainability–financial performance relationship? Investigating nostalgia’s influence on brand love Influence of governance indicators on public debt accumulation in Africa Analysing volatility patterns in emerging markets: symmetric or asymmetric models?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1