Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cesarean Section at UTH Women and Newborn Hospital Lusaka, Zambia

Joan Himalowa, Chola Mumbi, Simon Himalowa
{"title":"Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cesarean Section at UTH Women and Newborn Hospital Lusaka, Zambia","authors":"Joan Himalowa, Chola Mumbi, Simon Himalowa","doi":"10.52403/ijshr.20230344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Increase in cesarean section (CS) has been a source of public health concern globally. There is scanty updated information about cesarean section and associated factors in developing countries like Zambia. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CS and associated factors at The University Teaching Hospital women and New-born in Lusaka Zambia. Methodology: The study design was cross sectional. It involved retrospective collection of data from birth registers of women who gave birth at the University Teaching Hospital-Women and Newborn from 1st January, 2018 to 31st December 2018. The total sample size was 6,965 women (15-49 years) after the inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. Statistical analysis was conducted using Binary Logistic Regression, level of significance was 0.05 and Confidence Interval of 95%. Goodness of fit was conducted using the likelihood ratio test. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14.2. Results: The Prevalence of Cesarean section was 44%. Factors significantly associated with Cesarean Section were maternal age (grouped), Birth weight (grouped), gestational age (grouped) and still birth (AOR=0.47 P<0.0001). There was an increased odds of having Cesarean Section among multipara (AOR= 1.10 P=0.73) and Multigravida (AOR=1.04, P=0.73). Common maternal indicators identified were repeat caesarean section (18%), obstructed labor (11%) and failure to progress (10%). The common fetal indicators identified were fetal distress (18%), big baby (10%) and mal presentation (7%). Conclusion: Prevalence is higher than the recommended WHO limit. There is need to reinforce health education, reinforce fetal monitoring and promote vaginal birth after caesarean. Keywords: Cesarean Section, Prevalence, Factors, Women and newborn, Zambia.","PeriodicalId":14300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20230344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increase in cesarean section (CS) has been a source of public health concern globally. There is scanty updated information about cesarean section and associated factors in developing countries like Zambia. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CS and associated factors at The University Teaching Hospital women and New-born in Lusaka Zambia. Methodology: The study design was cross sectional. It involved retrospective collection of data from birth registers of women who gave birth at the University Teaching Hospital-Women and Newborn from 1st January, 2018 to 31st December 2018. The total sample size was 6,965 women (15-49 years) after the inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. Statistical analysis was conducted using Binary Logistic Regression, level of significance was 0.05 and Confidence Interval of 95%. Goodness of fit was conducted using the likelihood ratio test. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14.2. Results: The Prevalence of Cesarean section was 44%. Factors significantly associated with Cesarean Section were maternal age (grouped), Birth weight (grouped), gestational age (grouped) and still birth (AOR=0.47 P<0.0001). There was an increased odds of having Cesarean Section among multipara (AOR= 1.10 P=0.73) and Multigravida (AOR=1.04, P=0.73). Common maternal indicators identified were repeat caesarean section (18%), obstructed labor (11%) and failure to progress (10%). The common fetal indicators identified were fetal distress (18%), big baby (10%) and mal presentation (7%). Conclusion: Prevalence is higher than the recommended WHO limit. There is need to reinforce health education, reinforce fetal monitoring and promote vaginal birth after caesarean. Keywords: Cesarean Section, Prevalence, Factors, Women and newborn, Zambia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赞比亚卢萨卡UTH妇女和新生儿医院剖宫产的患病率和相关因素
背景:剖宫产(CS)的增加已成为全球公共卫生关注的一个来源。在赞比亚等发展中国家,关于剖宫产及其相关因素的最新信息很少。本研究的目的是确定赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院妇女和新生儿的CS患病率及其相关因素。方法学:本研究采用横断面设计。它涉及回顾性收集2018年1月1日至2018年12月31日在大学教学医院分娩的妇女的出生登记册数据。在符合纳入和排除标准后,总样本量为6,965名女性(15-49岁)。统计学分析采用二元Logistic回归,显著性水平为0.05,置信区间为95%。拟合优度采用似然比检验。数据分析使用STATA 14.2版本。结果:剖宫产率为44%。与剖宫产相关的因素有产妇年龄(分组)、出生体重(分组)、胎龄(分组)和死产(AOR=0.47 P<0.0001)。多产妇(AOR= 1.10, P=0.73)和多孕妇(AOR=1.04, P=0.73)剖宫产率增高。确定的常见产妇指标为重复剖宫产(18%)、难产(11%)和进展失败(10%)。常见的胎儿指标是胎儿窘迫(18%),大婴儿(10%)和畸形表现(7%)。结论:患病率高于WHO推荐限值。有必要加强健康教育,加强胎儿监测,促进剖腹产后顺产。关键词:剖宫产,流行,因素,妇女与新生儿,赞比亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation: A Prosthodontic Driven Approach: A Review The Dopamine Hypothesis as a Causal Explanation of Schizophrenia Effect of 4-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Dyspnea, Fatigue, Quality of Life and Radiological Findings in a Patient with Pulmonary Renal Syndrome Suffering from Pneumonia - A Case Study Characteristics of Corneal Ulcer Patients at Bali Mandara Eye Hospital in 2021-2022 Awareness of Preventive Measures in Osteoarthritis Among Urban Population in Pune City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1