Hygiene and environmental sanitation consequences on the spread of <i>Klebsiella species</i> and its antibiotic resistance in a ruminant animal farm

F.F, Oyebanji, A.T. Ajibola, T.H. Aroyehun, O.O. Omotara, T.H. Balogun, B.E. Lasabi, O, Salako, S.O. Elegbede, O.T. Dokunmu
{"title":"Hygiene and environmental sanitation consequences on the spread of &lt;i&gt;Klebsiella species&lt;/i&gt; and its antibiotic resistance in a ruminant animal farm","authors":"F.F, Oyebanji, A.T. Ajibola, T.H. Aroyehun, O.O. Omotara, T.H. Balogun, B.E. Lasabi, O, Salako, S.O. Elegbede, O.T. Dokunmu","doi":"10.4314/nvj.v43i3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the sanitation and hygiene practices in an animal farm through walkthrough observation and one-on-one interviews, monitored the levels of selected air parameters in animal houses using portable air samplers, identified the Klebsiella species from the bacterial population in the nose and skin of selected ruminant animals, and skin of consented animal handlers; and examined the antibiotic sensitivity test (AST) on the confirmed Klebsiella (K.) isolates following standard procedures. Most handlers (77.78%) wash their hands before starting work without soap (55.56 %), with well (77.78 %) or spent water (22.22 %). A total of 181 and 132 distinct bacterial colonies and gram-negative bacteria species, respectively, were obtained. The highest bacteria count (28cfu/ml) was from Cattle nasal swab samples, while the lowest (17cfu/ml each) was from the skin samples of Goats and Sheep. Also, the highest gram-negative bacteria (24cfu/ml) was from sheep skin swab samples, while the least was from goat nasal swab samples. Eighteen of thirty-two presumed K. species were confirmed with colony characteristics and biochemical tests. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was prevalent in 77.7% of the confirmed K. species. Two-thirds of Klebsiella isolates in goats and cattle showed multidrug resistance, compared with 60% in Sheep and 100 % in handlers. Klebsiella's estimated resistance percentages against Penicillin, Cefuroxime, Ceftazidime, Nitrofurantoin, and Gentamicin were 100, 67.7, 50, 38.9, and 22.2, respectively. This study found a significant gram-negative bacteria load in the skin swabs of animal handlers, which will only worsen with inadequate personal hygiene and poor sanitation.","PeriodicalId":19330,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Veterinary Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/nvj.v43i3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the sanitation and hygiene practices in an animal farm through walkthrough observation and one-on-one interviews, monitored the levels of selected air parameters in animal houses using portable air samplers, identified the Klebsiella species from the bacterial population in the nose and skin of selected ruminant animals, and skin of consented animal handlers; and examined the antibiotic sensitivity test (AST) on the confirmed Klebsiella (K.) isolates following standard procedures. Most handlers (77.78%) wash their hands before starting work without soap (55.56 %), with well (77.78 %) or spent water (22.22 %). A total of 181 and 132 distinct bacterial colonies and gram-negative bacteria species, respectively, were obtained. The highest bacteria count (28cfu/ml) was from Cattle nasal swab samples, while the lowest (17cfu/ml each) was from the skin samples of Goats and Sheep. Also, the highest gram-negative bacteria (24cfu/ml) was from sheep skin swab samples, while the least was from goat nasal swab samples. Eighteen of thirty-two presumed K. species were confirmed with colony characteristics and biochemical tests. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was prevalent in 77.7% of the confirmed K. species. Two-thirds of Klebsiella isolates in goats and cattle showed multidrug resistance, compared with 60% in Sheep and 100 % in handlers. Klebsiella's estimated resistance percentages against Penicillin, Cefuroxime, Ceftazidime, Nitrofurantoin, and Gentamicin were 100, 67.7, 50, 38.9, and 22.2, respectively. This study found a significant gram-negative bacteria load in the skin swabs of animal handlers, which will only worsen with inadequate personal hygiene and poor sanitation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生和环境卫生对克雷伯菌物种传播的影响;以及反刍动物农场的抗生素耐药性
本研究通过步行观察和一对一访谈评估了动物养殖场的环境卫生和卫生习惯,使用便携式空气采样器监测动物舍中选定空气参数的水平,从选定的反刍动物的鼻子和皮肤以及同意的动物处理者的皮肤中的细菌种群中确定了克雷伯氏菌种类;并按照标准程序对确诊的克雷伯菌(K.)分离株进行抗生素敏感性试验(AST)检查。大多数操作人员(77.78%)在开始工作前不使用肥皂洗手(55.56%),用清水洗手(77.78%)或用废水洗手(22.22%)。共获得181个菌落和132个革兰氏阴性菌种。牛鼻拭子样品中细菌数量最高(28cfu/ml),山羊和绵羊皮肤样品中细菌数量最低(17cfu/ml)。革兰氏阴性菌以绵羊皮肤拭子最高(24cfu/ml),山羊鼻拭子最低(24cfu/ml)。经菌落特征和生化试验证实,32种推定种中有18种。77.7%的确认种存在多药耐药(MDR)。山羊和牛中三分之二的克雷伯氏菌分离株显示出多药耐药性,绵羊中为60%,处理者中为100%。克雷伯菌对青霉素、头孢呋辛、头孢他啶、呋喃妥因和庆大霉素的估计耐药百分比分别为100、67.7、50、38.9和22.2。本研究发现,在动物处理者的皮肤拭子中存在显著的革兰氏阴性细菌负荷,如果个人卫生和卫生条件不佳,这种情况只会恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sequential histopathological changes of the lower respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts in chickens infected with velogenic Newcastle disease virus Pathological report of acute traumatic bovine reticulo-pericarditis in a 4½-year-old Bunaji (White Fulani) cow Primary gastric rupture in an adult female West African Dongola horse in Nigeria: A case report Detection, distribution, and health risk assessment of heavy metals in wild catfish sold in Maiduguri Metropolis of Borno State, Northeastern Nigeria Molecular and serological detection of Newcastle disease virus in live-bird markets, Jos, Plateau State Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1