Bad apples or rotten orchards? Public attitudes of interactions with police and the role of political ideology

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1108/pijpsm-07-2023-0098
Michael A. Hansen, John C. Navarro
{"title":"Bad apples or rotten orchards? Public attitudes of interactions with police and the role of political ideology","authors":"Michael A. Hansen, John C. Navarro","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-07-2023-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the ideological gaps across a range of policing interactions with the public. Design/methodology/approach In a survey distributed via Mechanical Turk (MTurk) ( n = 979), the authors explore the role that respondents' political ideology plays in the agreement of 13 aspects of policing services, their demeanor and decorum. Findings Attitudes toward policing interactions are slightly positive. Conservatives steadfastly hold positive attitudes about police. Liberals vacillate from negative to positive attitudes across the 13 policing interaction statements. Social implications Although small, there is an ideological consensus that police adequately protect citizens and are knowledgeable about the law. Originality/value Even at record lows of public confidence in the police, some subsections of the sample, such as conservatives, firmly hold positive attitudes about police. The unwavering support for police by conservatives continues across the multi-item measure of policing interactions, whereas liberals illustrated less uniformity in their attitudes.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-07-2023-0098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the ideological gaps across a range of policing interactions with the public. Design/methodology/approach In a survey distributed via Mechanical Turk (MTurk) ( n = 979), the authors explore the role that respondents' political ideology plays in the agreement of 13 aspects of policing services, their demeanor and decorum. Findings Attitudes toward policing interactions are slightly positive. Conservatives steadfastly hold positive attitudes about police. Liberals vacillate from negative to positive attitudes across the 13 policing interaction statements. Social implications Although small, there is an ideological consensus that police adequately protect citizens and are knowledgeable about the law. Originality/value Even at record lows of public confidence in the police, some subsections of the sample, such as conservatives, firmly hold positive attitudes about police. The unwavering support for police by conservatives continues across the multi-item measure of policing interactions, whereas liberals illustrated less uniformity in their attitudes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坏苹果还是烂果园?公众对与警察互动的态度与政治意识形态的作用
本研究的目的是探讨在一系列警务与公众互动中的意识形态差距。在通过Mechanical Turk (MTurk) (n = 979)分发的一项调查中,作者探讨了受访者的政治意识形态在警察服务、他们的举止和礼仪的13个方面的协议中所起的作用。调查结果对警察互动的态度略积极。保守派对警察持坚定的积极态度。在13项警务互动声明中,自由主义者的态度在消极和积极之间摇摆不定。社会影响虽然很小,但意识形态上的共识是,警察充分保护公民,并了解法律。即使公众对警察的信心处于历史低点,样本中的某些部分,如保守派,对警察持坚定的积极态度。保守派对警察的坚定支持贯穿了警察互动的多项指标,而自由派的态度则不那么一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
期刊最新文献
How can we help law enforcement agencies learn? A look at CALEA police accreditation Crime on the mass transit system in Hong Kong: a hotspots and harmspots trajectory approach Does Weisburd's law of crime concentration apply to traffic crashes? Implications for policing and traffic law enforcement How the police conceptualise and view the relevance of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) for policing: a qualitative investigation Compliments or complaints: an evaluation of a community oriented policing practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1