Mohammadtaghi Rahmani, Armin Barjani, Maria I Todorovska
{"title":"Variability in parameter estimation for a tall steel-frame building","authors":"Mohammadtaghi Rahmani, Armin Barjani, Maria I Todorovska","doi":"10.1177/87552930231195370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The between-event variability in identified shear wave velocities of fitted four-layer beam models in the response of a 54-story steel-frame building during nine earthquakes over a period of 27 years (1992–2019) is investigated. Recorded response and simulated response by its digital twin (linear finite element model with fixed base) were used as input, that is, the real structure and its digital twin were identified. Two surrogate models were fitted, a Timoshenko beam and a shear beam. The waveform inversion of impulse response functions method, developed earlier by the authors, was used to fit the beam models. The coefficients of variation (C.V.) of the between-events variability in the wave velocity estimates of the four layers were analyzed and compared for the different cases of data (real structure versus digital twin), different surrogate models, and different locations on the floor where the motions were observed. The results showed that the variability of the digital twin was affected by the contamination of the response by torsion, which is not accounted for in the beam models, by the degree of geometric regularity of the structure and by how closely the beam model represented the nature of the building deformation (balance of shear and bending deformation). These effects were minor in comparison to the nonlinear effects (recoverable nonlinearity and permanent stiffness degradation), which were not present in the digital twin response. The C.V. for the real structure (about 3%–5%) was comparable for both beam models fitted.","PeriodicalId":11392,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231195370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The between-event variability in identified shear wave velocities of fitted four-layer beam models in the response of a 54-story steel-frame building during nine earthquakes over a period of 27 years (1992–2019) is investigated. Recorded response and simulated response by its digital twin (linear finite element model with fixed base) were used as input, that is, the real structure and its digital twin were identified. Two surrogate models were fitted, a Timoshenko beam and a shear beam. The waveform inversion of impulse response functions method, developed earlier by the authors, was used to fit the beam models. The coefficients of variation (C.V.) of the between-events variability in the wave velocity estimates of the four layers were analyzed and compared for the different cases of data (real structure versus digital twin), different surrogate models, and different locations on the floor where the motions were observed. The results showed that the variability of the digital twin was affected by the contamination of the response by torsion, which is not accounted for in the beam models, by the degree of geometric regularity of the structure and by how closely the beam model represented the nature of the building deformation (balance of shear and bending deformation). These effects were minor in comparison to the nonlinear effects (recoverable nonlinearity and permanent stiffness degradation), which were not present in the digital twin response. The C.V. for the real structure (about 3%–5%) was comparable for both beam models fitted.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Spectra, the professional peer-reviewed journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), serves as the publication of record for the development of earthquake engineering practice, earthquake codes and regulations, earthquake public policy, and earthquake investigation reports. The journal is published quarterly in both printed and online editions in February, May, August, and November, with additional special edition issues.
EERI established Earthquake Spectra with the purpose of improving the practice of earthquake hazards mitigation, preparedness, and recovery — serving the informational needs of the diverse professionals engaged in earthquake risk reduction: civil, geotechnical, mechanical, and structural engineers; geologists, seismologists, and other earth scientists; architects and city planners; public officials; social scientists; and researchers.