Safety of Adalimumab: An Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-09-23 DOI:10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629
Buthainah Ghanem
{"title":"Safety of Adalimumab: An Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database","authors":"Buthainah Ghanem","doi":"10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to assess the safety profile of adalimumab and its biosimilars for each approved indication by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Method: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of AE reports documented from 2002 to 2022 in the FAERS database. This analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to investigate safety signals related to the disproportionate reporting of serious AEs for adalimumab and its biosimilars compared to currently available biological products for the same proposed indications. Results: A total of 543,873 AEs related to adalimumab treatment were reported, with 49.8% classified as serious. Hospitalization was the most frequently reported AE. Risk factors associated with serious AEs included age (≥60 years), male sex, and the concurrent use of adalimumab (ROR >1, P<0.05). Adalimumab exhibited a lower risk of serious AEs compared to abatacept, certolizumab, infliximab, or rituximab. Conversely, etanercept and ixekizumab showed lower odds of serious AEs than adalimumab (ROR <1, P<0.05). Conclusion: In summary, these findings suggest that adalimumab has a well-tolerated safety profile for approved indications when compared to currently available biological alternatives.","PeriodicalId":14719,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the safety profile of adalimumab and its biosimilars for each approved indication by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Method: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of AE reports documented from 2002 to 2022 in the FAERS database. This analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to investigate safety signals related to the disproportionate reporting of serious AEs for adalimumab and its biosimilars compared to currently available biological products for the same proposed indications. Results: A total of 543,873 AEs related to adalimumab treatment were reported, with 49.8% classified as serious. Hospitalization was the most frequently reported AE. Risk factors associated with serious AEs included age (≥60 years), male sex, and the concurrent use of adalimumab (ROR >1, P<0.05). Adalimumab exhibited a lower risk of serious AEs compared to abatacept, certolizumab, infliximab, or rituximab. Conversely, etanercept and ixekizumab showed lower odds of serious AEs than adalimumab (ROR <1, P<0.05). Conclusion: In summary, these findings suggest that adalimumab has a well-tolerated safety profile for approved indications when compared to currently available biological alternatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿达木单抗安全性:FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库分析
目的:本研究旨在通过分析FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中报告的不良事件(ae),评估阿达木单抗及其生物仿制药对每个已批准适应症的安全性。方法:对FAERS数据库中2002年至2022年的AE报告进行回顾性药物警戒分析。分析包括描述性统计和二元逻辑回归分析。我们以95%置信区间(CI)计算报告优势比(RORs),以调查与阿达木单抗及其生物类似药相比,针对相同建议适应症的现有生物制品严重ae报告不成比例相关的安全信号。结果:共报告了与阿达木单抗治疗相关的543,873例ae,其中49.8%为严重ae。住院是最常见的AE报告。与严重ae相关的危险因素包括年龄(≥60岁)、男性和同时使用阿达木单抗(ROR >1, P<0.05)。与阿巴接受、certolizumab、英夫利昔单抗或利妥昔单抗相比,阿达木单抗显示出较低的严重ae风险。相反,依那西普和伊谢珠单抗发生严重ae的几率低于阿达木单抗(ROR <1, P<0.05)。结论:总之,这些发现表明,与目前可用的生物替代品相比,阿达木单抗在批准适应症中具有良好的耐受性安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JJPS) is a scientific, bi-annual, peer-reviewed publication that will focus on current topics of interest to the pharmaceutical community at large. Although the JJPS is intended to be of interest to pharmaceutical scientists, other healthy workers, and manufacturing processors will also find it most interesting and informative. Papers will cover basic pharmaceutical and applied research, scientific commentaries, as well as views, reviews. Topics on products will include manufacturing process, quality control, pharmaceutical engineering, pharmaceutical technology, and philosophies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences. The editorial advisory board would like to place an emphasis on new and innovative methods, technologies, and techniques for the pharmaceutical industry. The reader will find a broad range of important topics in this first issue.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in Development of Vesicular Carrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery: A Review MMP-1 and MMP-7 Expression is Influenced by Ginsenosides in Mice Exposed to Aflatoxin B1: in vivo Study Optimizing Drug Delivery Vehicle with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) - Based Excipient Selection A Review on Recent Advances of Natural Products as Larvicides in Vector Control Management Evaluation of the Impact of Orange Juice on Apixaban Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1