Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1111/jomf.12935
Paul Y. Chang, Jihye Oh, Young-Mi Kim
{"title":"Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea","authors":"Paul Y. Chang,&nbsp;Jihye Oh,&nbsp;Young-Mi Kim","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the “demographic crisis” sweeping East Asia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-Western societies is likely to identify a more diverse range of processes governing marriage patterns in advanced capitalist societies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The study draws on the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS) to analyze a sample of 4201 unmarried individuals whose longitudinal data were organized into 55,989 person-year records. Discrete-time hazard models incorporating 23 waves of KLIPS data (1998–2020) identify the gendered determinants of marriage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Socioeconomic resources continue to positively impact men's marriage chances although income, relative to employment status and educational attainment, has become paramount for members of the younger 1980s cohort. Parental wealth, an important precondition for home purchases, also positively impacts the likelihood of marriage for men. Income and parental wealth have become important for women as well but unlike the documented “educational crossover” that has occurred elsewhere, high educational attainment remains negatively associated with marriage probability for Korean women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study clarifies the scope conditions for arguments about the “shifting economic foundations of marriage,” while foregrounding the enduring legacy of extended-family resources in strong familism societies. The results also lend empirical leverage to past studies highlighting the clear disincentives for marriage among highly educated women and provide a more comprehensive picture of why underprivileged men are being left out of Korea's marriage market.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"86 1","pages":"132-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the “demographic crisis” sweeping East Asia.

Background

The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-Western societies is likely to identify a more diverse range of processes governing marriage patterns in advanced capitalist societies.

Method

The study draws on the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS) to analyze a sample of 4201 unmarried individuals whose longitudinal data were organized into 55,989 person-year records. Discrete-time hazard models incorporating 23 waves of KLIPS data (1998–2020) identify the gendered determinants of marriage.

Results

Socioeconomic resources continue to positively impact men's marriage chances although income, relative to employment status and educational attainment, has become paramount for members of the younger 1980s cohort. Parental wealth, an important precondition for home purchases, also positively impacts the likelihood of marriage for men. Income and parental wealth have become important for women as well but unlike the documented “educational crossover” that has occurred elsewhere, high educational attainment remains negatively associated with marriage probability for Korean women.

Conclusion

This study clarifies the scope conditions for arguments about the “shifting economic foundations of marriage,” while foregrounding the enduring legacy of extended-family resources in strong familism societies. The results also lend empirical leverage to past studies highlighting the clear disincentives for marriage among highly educated women and provide a more comprehensive picture of why underprivileged men are being left out of Korea's marriage market.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择退出还是被冷落?韩国婚姻的性别决定因素
目的 本研究探讨了韩国婚姻状况下降的决定因素,韩国是席卷东亚的 "人口危机 "的代表。 背景 有关婚姻和家庭趋势的主要理论大多基于西方案例。对非西方社会的补充关注可能会发现先进资本主义社会中支配婚姻模式的更多样化的过程。 研究方法 本研究利用韩国劳动与收入面板研究(KLIPS)分析了 4201 个未婚个人的样本,其纵向数据被整理成 55989 个人年记录。离散时间危险模型纳入了 23 波 KLIPS 数据(1998-2020 年),确定了婚姻的性别决定因素。 结果 社会经济资源继续对男性的婚姻机会产生积极影响,尽管相对于就业状况和受教育程度而言,收入对 20 世纪 80 年代年轻一代的成员而言已变得至关重要。作为购房的重要前提条件,父母的财富也对男性的结婚几率产生积极影响。收入和父母财富对女性也很重要,但与其他地方出现的 "教育交叉 "不同,韩国女性的高教育程度仍然与结婚概率呈负相关。 结论 本研究澄清了 "婚姻经济基础转变 "论点的范围条件,同时强调了大家庭资源在强家庭主义社会中的持久传承。研究结果还为过去的研究提供了实证依据,这些研究强调了高学历女性明显的婚姻抑制因素,并更全面地揭示了韩国婚姻市场为何将弱势群体男性排除在外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Introduction to mid-decade Special Issue on Theory and Methods The ties that bind: Questions for studying families in neighborhood contexts Issue Information Looking beyond marital status: What we can learn from relationship status measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1