E-Waste Management: An Analysis under the Perspective of Conflicts and Shared Responsibility

IF 3.6 Q2 MANAGEMENT Logistics-Basel Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.3390/logistics7040074
Layanne Nara Parente Cardoso, Karla Danyelle de Oliveira Miranda, Ednael Francisco Vieira da Silva, Patricia Guarnieri, José Leão e Silva Filho, Lúcio Camara e Silva
{"title":"E-Waste Management: An Analysis under the Perspective of Conflicts and Shared Responsibility","authors":"Layanne Nara Parente Cardoso, Karla Danyelle de Oliveira Miranda, Ednael Francisco Vieira da Silva, Patricia Guarnieri, José Leão e Silva Filho, Lúcio Camara e Silva","doi":"10.3390/logistics7040074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy establishes the shared responsibility of all actors involved in e-waste generation and management; however, some conflicts of interest need interventions and approaches for preventing them. Objective: This paper proposes using a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system to simulate the analysis and resolution of realistic e-waste management conflicts. Method: A systematic literature review focused on e-waste management, shared responsibility and conflict management was conducted, and a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system was applied to generate a framework to address this context. Results: The need for commitment agreements promoted by government institutions in partnerships with companies involved in the process is essential since the principle of shared responsibility requires educational actions, favoring efficiency in the reverse logistics recovery procedures for e-waste. Understanding the interconnected causes of conflicts and their facets is crucial for effective resolution and prevention, aiding comprehension, focused interventions, and evidence-based decision-making for transformative change amidst conflicting stakeholder objectives in the case of WEEE management. These results can be helpful for academics and practitioners working in this area.","PeriodicalId":56264,"journal":{"name":"Logistics-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logistics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7040074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy establishes the shared responsibility of all actors involved in e-waste generation and management; however, some conflicts of interest need interventions and approaches for preventing them. Objective: This paper proposes using a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system to simulate the analysis and resolution of realistic e-waste management conflicts. Method: A systematic literature review focused on e-waste management, shared responsibility and conflict management was conducted, and a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system was applied to generate a framework to address this context. Results: The need for commitment agreements promoted by government institutions in partnerships with companies involved in the process is essential since the principle of shared responsibility requires educational actions, favoring efficiency in the reverse logistics recovery procedures for e-waste. Understanding the interconnected causes of conflicts and their facets is crucial for effective resolution and prevention, aiding comprehension, focused interventions, and evidence-based decision-making for transformative change amidst conflicting stakeholder objectives in the case of WEEE management. These results can be helpful for academics and practitioners working in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子垃圾管理:冲突与责任共担视角下的分析
背景:巴西国家固体废物政策规定了参与电子废物产生和管理的所有行为者的共同责任;然而,一些利益冲突需要干预和方法来预防。目的:利用冲突解决(GMCR)决策支持系统的图模型模拟现实电子垃圾管理冲突的分析与解决。方法:对电子垃圾管理、责任分担和冲突管理相关文献进行系统综述,并运用冲突解决决策支持系统的图模型生成解决这一问题的框架。结果:政府机构与参与这一过程的公司建立伙伴关系,促进承诺协议的必要性是必不可少的,因为共同责任的原则需要教育行动,有利于电子废物逆向物流回收程序的效率。在报废电子电气设备管理的情况下,了解冲突的相互关联的原因及其方面对于有效解决和预防、帮助理解、集中干预和基于证据的决策是至关重要的,以便在冲突的利益相关者目标中进行变革。这些结果可以帮助在这一领域工作的学者和实践者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Logistics-Basel
Logistics-Basel Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current State and Future of International Logistics Networks—The Role of Digitalization and Sustainability in a Globalized World An Innovative Framework for Quality Assurance in Logistics Packaging Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation in the COVID-19 Era: Implications from Driving Schools A Systematic Literature Review on the Application of Automation in Logistics Climate Justice Implications of Banning Air-Freighted Fresh Produce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1