Towards a co-creative stakeholder engagement in Smart City projects: a life-cycle approach

Richmond Juvenile Ehwi, Hannah Holmes, Sabina Maslova, Gemma Burgess
{"title":"Towards a co-creative stakeholder engagement in Smart City projects: a life-cycle approach","authors":"Richmond Juvenile Ehwi, Hannah Holmes, Sabina Maslova, Gemma Burgess","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2266579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engaging stakeholders to co-create Smart Cities is an aspiration for many city governments. However, existing stakeholder engagement frameworks tend to be technologically deterministic from the outset, leaving no room for meaningful co-creation. This paper proposes a framework for engaging stakeholders in Smart City development without presuming an already existing technology which stakeholders must accept. The framework follows the life-cycle approach to disaggregate the Smart City development process into seven separate but interrelated stages anchored on three pillars – ‘the right to the city’, ‘the IAP2 spectrum of public participation’ and ‘technological sovereignty’ to highlight issues deemed critical for a meaningful co-creative stakeholder engagement. The study identifies funding, an understanding of the city and its challenges from multiple stakeholder perspectives, the promotion of digital rights, and meaningful stakeholder engagement as four pertinent issues that must be taken on board to move this framework from a conceptual abstraction to a practical toolkit.","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2266579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging stakeholders to co-create Smart Cities is an aspiration for many city governments. However, existing stakeholder engagement frameworks tend to be technologically deterministic from the outset, leaving no room for meaningful co-creation. This paper proposes a framework for engaging stakeholders in Smart City development without presuming an already existing technology which stakeholders must accept. The framework follows the life-cycle approach to disaggregate the Smart City development process into seven separate but interrelated stages anchored on three pillars – ‘the right to the city’, ‘the IAP2 spectrum of public participation’ and ‘technological sovereignty’ to highlight issues deemed critical for a meaningful co-creative stakeholder engagement. The study identifies funding, an understanding of the city and its challenges from multiple stakeholder perspectives, the promotion of digital rights, and meaningful stakeholder engagement as four pertinent issues that must be taken on board to move this framework from a conceptual abstraction to a practical toolkit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智慧城市项目中共同创造的利益相关者参与:生命周期方法
吸引利益相关者共同创建智慧城市是许多城市政府的愿望。然而,现有的涉众参与框架从一开始就倾向于在技术上确定,没有为有意义的共同创造留下空间。本文提出了一个框架,使利益相关者参与智慧城市的发展,而不假设利益相关者必须接受已经存在的技术。该框架遵循生命周期方法,将智慧城市发展过程分解为七个独立但相互关联的阶段,以三大支柱为基础——“城市权”、“公众参与的IAP2频谱”和“技术主权”,以突出被认为对有意义的共同创造性利益相关者参与至关重要的问题。该研究确定了资金、从多个利益相关者角度对城市及其挑战的理解、促进数字权利和有意义的利益相关者参与,这是将该框架从概念抽象转变为实际工具包必须考虑的四个相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: European integration and enlargement pose fundamental challenges for policy, politics, citizenship, culture and democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research provides a unique forum for discussing these processes. It welcomes articles on all aspects of European developments that contribute to the improvement of social science knowledge and to the setting of a policy-focused European research agenda. Examples of typical subject areas covered include •Policy-Making and Agenda-Setting •Multilevel Governance •The Role of Institutions •Democracy and Civil Society •Social Structures and Integration •Sustainability and Ecological Modernisation •Science, Research, Technology and Society
期刊最新文献
Impact of authorship on citation rates: a comparative analysis of top 9999 articles in social science A systematic literature review on collaborative innovation in the public sector Towards a co-creative stakeholder engagement in Smart City projects: a life-cycle approach What matters in the local adaptation of Western social innovation to China: deep core beliefs, institutional boundary conditions or managerial practices? Multinational cooperation on challenging energy technologies: ‘ITER Project’ an EU mission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1