{"title":"Taking statecraft seriously: Allan Gyngell’s legacy in reimagining Australian foreign policy","authors":"Hugh Piper, Melissa Conley Tyler","doi":"10.1080/10357718.2023.2273457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In this speech, Allan described statecraft as ‘the matching of ends and means, the prioritising of objectives and instruments’. He asked, \"What sort of national capabilities will Australia need in the fragmented period ahead and how can we develop them? Obviously, we need the economic strength that gives us weight in the world and the capacity to support an effective military force. We need to preserve the social resilience that keeps Australians united behind fundamental democratic values. That is the business of statecraft. Foreign policy draws on all the available instruments of the state, and many that lie in the broader community.\"2 As David Kilcullen defined it in 2007: ‘Statecraft is the art of defining and pursuing national objectives in their domestic and international contexts. It is larger than domestic or international relations, and broader than national security, economic or social policy. It is a (perhaps un-stated) conceptual construct of the individual, the nation, the state and all their internal and external relationships, which unifies approaches to all areas of policy. Notions of statecraft inform a conception of ‘Australia’ in the minds of individuals that drives actions across many disparate fields. Effective statecraft is based upon the interplay of all sources of national power – including political, military, economic, scientific and technological, social, industrial and informational power. Its external aspect is expressed in four basic dimensions of influence: diplomatic, informational, military and economic.’Additional informationNotes on contributorsHugh PiperHugh Piper was Program Lead at the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue (AP4D).Melissa Conley TylerMelissa Conley Tyler is Executive Director at the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue (AP4D).","PeriodicalId":51708,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of International Affairs","volume":"12 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2273457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In this speech, Allan described statecraft as ‘the matching of ends and means, the prioritising of objectives and instruments’. He asked, "What sort of national capabilities will Australia need in the fragmented period ahead and how can we develop them? Obviously, we need the economic strength that gives us weight in the world and the capacity to support an effective military force. We need to preserve the social resilience that keeps Australians united behind fundamental democratic values. That is the business of statecraft. Foreign policy draws on all the available instruments of the state, and many that lie in the broader community."2 As David Kilcullen defined it in 2007: ‘Statecraft is the art of defining and pursuing national objectives in their domestic and international contexts. It is larger than domestic or international relations, and broader than national security, economic or social policy. It is a (perhaps un-stated) conceptual construct of the individual, the nation, the state and all their internal and external relationships, which unifies approaches to all areas of policy. Notions of statecraft inform a conception of ‘Australia’ in the minds of individuals that drives actions across many disparate fields. Effective statecraft is based upon the interplay of all sources of national power – including political, military, economic, scientific and technological, social, industrial and informational power. Its external aspect is expressed in four basic dimensions of influence: diplomatic, informational, military and economic.’Additional informationNotes on contributorsHugh PiperHugh Piper was Program Lead at the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue (AP4D).Melissa Conley TylerMelissa Conley Tyler is Executive Director at the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue (AP4D).
期刊介绍:
AJIA is the journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs. The Institute was established in 1933 as an independent and non-political body and its purpose is to stimulate interest in and understanding of international affairs among its members and the general public. The aim of the Australian Journal of International Affairs is to publish high quality scholarly research on international political, social, economic and legal issues, especially (but not exclusively) within the Asia-Pacific region. The journal publishes research articles, refereed review essays and commentary and provocation pieces. ''Articles'' are traditional scholarly articles. ‘Review essays’ use newly published books as the basis to thematically examine current events in International Relations. The journal also publishes commentaries and provocations which are high quality and engaging pieces of commentary, opinion and provocation in a variety of styles. The Australian Journal of International Affairs aims to analyse international issues for an Australian readership and to present Australian perspectives to readers in other countries. While seeking to stimulate interest in and understanding of international affairs, the journal does not seek to promote any particular policies or approaches. All suitable manuscripts submitted are sent to two referees in a full ''double blind'' refereeing process.