Hysterically y-ours: Reclaiming academic writing as a hysterical practice

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organization Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1177/13505084231198436
Anna-Liisa Kaasila-Pakanen, Emmanouela Mandalaki
{"title":"<i>Hysterically y-ours</i>: Reclaiming academic writing as a hysterical practice","authors":"Anna-Liisa Kaasila-Pakanen, Emmanouela Mandalaki","doi":"10.1177/13505084231198436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yet another hysteric! Can’t bear it anymore? Neither can we! In this text, we reclaim this highly derogatory term, “hysteric,” so often used against us, as women academic writers, to rewrite the gendered architecture of academic membership in organization studies. Performing hysterical writing interweaves affects, poems and reflections with feminist theoretical and methodological inspirations to challenge the masculine norms that marginalize affective, sentient, feminine and/or other, nonconforming, different bodies from academic texts. Specifically, drawing on Irigarayan mimesis as an activist feminist practice, we develop hysteria’s transformative, response-able potentials for writing, researching, relating and eventually knowing differently in organization studies. Our account contributes to burgeoning debates on writing differently particularly by situating the ethico-political potentials of écriture feminine for knowledge creation and resistance against epistemic oppression and violence.","PeriodicalId":48238,"journal":{"name":"Organization","volume":"8 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231198436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yet another hysteric! Can’t bear it anymore? Neither can we! In this text, we reclaim this highly derogatory term, “hysteric,” so often used against us, as women academic writers, to rewrite the gendered architecture of academic membership in organization studies. Performing hysterical writing interweaves affects, poems and reflections with feminist theoretical and methodological inspirations to challenge the masculine norms that marginalize affective, sentient, feminine and/or other, nonconforming, different bodies from academic texts. Specifically, drawing on Irigarayan mimesis as an activist feminist practice, we develop hysteria’s transformative, response-able potentials for writing, researching, relating and eventually knowing differently in organization studies. Our account contributes to burgeoning debates on writing differently particularly by situating the ethico-political potentials of écriture feminine for knowledge creation and resistance against epistemic oppression and violence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歇斯底里的写作:将学术写作重新定义为一种歇斯底里的实践
又是一个歇斯底里的人!再也不能忍受了?我们也不能!在这篇文章中,我们重新使用这个高度贬义的术语,“歇斯底里”,经常用来反对我们,作为女性学术作家,重写组织研究中学术成员的性别架构。表演歇斯底里的写作将情感、诗歌和反思与女权主义的理论和方法灵感交织在一起,挑战男性规范,这些规范将情感、感性、女性和/或其他不符合规范的、不同的身体从学术文本中边缘化。具体地说,我们将Irigarayan的模仿作为一种积极的女权主义实践,在组织研究中,我们开发了歇斯底里的变革性、响应性潜力,包括写作、研究、联系和最终的不同认识。我们的叙述促进了关于以不同方式写作的蓬勃发展的辩论,特别是通过将女性化的道德-政治潜力置于知识创造和抵抗知识压迫和暴力的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organization
Organization MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses the full range of key theoretical, methodological and substantive debates and developments in organizational analysis, broadly conceived, identifying and assessing their impacts on organizational practices worldwide. Alongside more micro-processual analyses, it particularly encourages attention to the links between intellectual developments, changes in organizational forms and practices, and broader social, cultural and institutional transformations.
期刊最新文献
Alter-anthropological thought in organization studies From anti-state Nazism to neo-bureaucracy? Media Review: Lupin: Eradicating the stereotype of the African immigrant Carta Aberta: (In)visibilizing transgender bodies in organizations Rethinking organization studies methods through a posthumanist epistemology of practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1