Machine learning algorithms improve MODIS GPP estimates in United States croplands

Dorothy Menefee, Trey O. Lee, K. Colton Flynn, Jiquan Chen, Michael Abraha, John Baker, Andy Suyker
{"title":"Machine learning algorithms improve MODIS GPP estimates in United States croplands","authors":"Dorothy Menefee, Trey O. Lee, K. Colton Flynn, Jiquan Chen, Michael Abraha, John Baker, Andy Suyker","doi":"10.3389/frsen.2023.1240895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Machine learning methods combined with satellite imagery have the potential to improve estimates of carbon uptake of terrestrial ecosystems, including croplands. Studying carbon uptake patterns across the U.S. using research networks, like the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network, can allow for the study of broader trends in crop productivity and sustainability. Methods: In this study, gross primary productivity (GPP) estimates from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for three LTAR cropland sites were integrated for use in a machine learning modeling effort. They are Kellogg Biological Station (KBS, 2 towers and 20 site-years), Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB - Rosemount, 1 tower and 12 site-years), and Platte River High Plains Aquifer (PRHPA, 3 towers and 52 site-years). All sites were planted to maize ( Zea mays L .) and soybean ( Glycine max L .). The MODIS GPP product was initially compared to in-situ measurements from Eddy Covariance (EC) instruments at each site and then to all sites combined. Next, machine learning algorithms were used to create refined GPP estimates using air temperature, precipitation, crop type (maize or soybean), agroecosystem, and the MODIS GPP product as inputs. The AutoML program in the h2o package tested a variety of individual and combined algorithms, including Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting Models (XGBoost), and Stacked Ensemble. Results and discussion: The coefficient of determination ( r 2 ) of the raw comparison (MODIS GPP to EC GPP) was 0.38, prior to machine learning model incorporation. The optimal model for simulating GPP across all sites was a Stacked Ensemble type with a validated r 2 value of 0.87, RMSE of 2.62 units, and MAE of 1.59. The machine learning methodology was able to successfully simulate GPP across three agroecosystems and two crops.","PeriodicalId":198378,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2023.1240895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Machine learning methods combined with satellite imagery have the potential to improve estimates of carbon uptake of terrestrial ecosystems, including croplands. Studying carbon uptake patterns across the U.S. using research networks, like the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network, can allow for the study of broader trends in crop productivity and sustainability. Methods: In this study, gross primary productivity (GPP) estimates from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for three LTAR cropland sites were integrated for use in a machine learning modeling effort. They are Kellogg Biological Station (KBS, 2 towers and 20 site-years), Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB - Rosemount, 1 tower and 12 site-years), and Platte River High Plains Aquifer (PRHPA, 3 towers and 52 site-years). All sites were planted to maize ( Zea mays L .) and soybean ( Glycine max L .). The MODIS GPP product was initially compared to in-situ measurements from Eddy Covariance (EC) instruments at each site and then to all sites combined. Next, machine learning algorithms were used to create refined GPP estimates using air temperature, precipitation, crop type (maize or soybean), agroecosystem, and the MODIS GPP product as inputs. The AutoML program in the h2o package tested a variety of individual and combined algorithms, including Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting Models (XGBoost), and Stacked Ensemble. Results and discussion: The coefficient of determination ( r 2 ) of the raw comparison (MODIS GPP to EC GPP) was 0.38, prior to machine learning model incorporation. The optimal model for simulating GPP across all sites was a Stacked Ensemble type with a validated r 2 value of 0.87, RMSE of 2.62 units, and MAE of 1.59. The machine learning methodology was able to successfully simulate GPP across three agroecosystems and two crops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习算法改进了美国农田的MODIS GPP估计
导读:结合卫星图像的机器学习方法有可能改善对陆地生态系统(包括农田)碳吸收的估计。利用长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络等研究网络研究美国各地的碳吸收模式,可以研究作物生产力和可持续性的更广泛趋势。方法:在本研究中,对三个LTAR农田的中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)估算的总初级生产力(GPP)进行了整合,用于机器学习建模工作。它们是凯洛格生物站(KBS, 2个塔和20个站点年),密西西比河上游流域(UMRB -罗斯蒙特,1个塔和12个站点年)和普拉特河高平原含水层(PRHPA, 3个塔和52个站点年)。所有试验点均种植玉米(Zea mays L .)和大豆(Glycine max L .)。MODIS GPP产品首先与每个站点的Eddy Covariance (EC)仪器的现场测量结果进行比较,然后与所有站点的测量结果进行比较。接下来,使用机器学习算法将气温、降水、作物类型(玉米或大豆)、农业生态系统和MODIS GPP产品作为输入,创建精细的GPP估计。h2o包中的AutoML程序测试了各种单独和组合算法,包括梯度增强机(GBM),极端梯度增强模型(XGBoost)和堆叠集成。结果和讨论:在机器学习模型纳入之前,原始比较(MODIS GPP与EC GPP)的决定系数(r 2)为0.38。所有站点GPP的最优模拟模型为堆叠集成模型,验证r 2值为0.87,RMSE为2.62,MAE为1.59。机器学习方法能够成功地模拟三种农业生态系统和两种作物的GPP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A near-real-time tropical deforestation monitoring algorithm based on the CuSum change detection method Suitability of different in-water algorithms for eutrophic and absorbing waters applied to Sentinel-2 MSI and Sentinel-3 OLCI data Sea surface barometry with an O2 differential absorption radar: retrieval algorithm development and simulation Assessment of advanced neural networks for the dual estimation of water quality indicators and their uncertainties Selecting HyperNav deployment sites for calibrating and validating PACE ocean color observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1