Soil Alveolata diversity in the undisturbed steppe and wheat agrocenoses under different tillage

N. B. Naumova, P. A. Barsukov, O. A. Baturina, O. A. Rusalimova, M. R. Kabilov
{"title":"Soil Alveolata diversity in the undisturbed steppe and wheat agrocenoses under different tillage","authors":"N. B. Naumova, P. A. Barsukov, O. A. Baturina, O. A. Rusalimova, M. R. Kabilov","doi":"10.18699/vjgb-23-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microeukaryotes are vital for maintaining soil quality and ecosystem functioning, however, their communities are less studied than bacterial and fungal ones, especially by high throughput sequencing techniques. Alveolates are important members of soil microbial communities, being consumers and/or prey for other microorganisms. We studied alveolate diversity in soil under the undisturbed steppe (US) and cropped for wheat using two tillage practices (conventional, CT, and no-till, NT) by amplifying the ITS2 marker with ITS3_KYO2/ITS4 primers and sequencing amplicons using Illumina MiSeq. A total of 198 Alveolata OTUs were identified, with 158 OTUs attributed to the Ciliophora phylum, containing five classes: Litostomatea, Spirotrichea and Oligohymenophorea, Nassophorea and Phyllopharyngea. Litostomatea and Phyllopharyngea were more abundant in US as compared with CT and NT. The observed OTU richness was higher in US than in CT and NT. The β-biodiversity of soil ciliates also very distinctly differentiated the US field from CT and NT. In the US, Nassophorea and Spirotrichea correlated positively with sand and negatively with clay, silt and SOM contents. This is the first report about soil ciliates diversity in Siberia as assessed by metabarcoding technique. The revealed clear effect of land use on the relative abundance of some taxa and a lack of tillage effect suggest the importance of the quantity and quality of plant material input for shaping the prey for ciliates. The ITS-metabarcoding technique was used for the first time in the research of ciliates diversity; further studies, embracing diverse aspects of soil ciliates by combining -omics methodology with the traditional one, are needed to get a better insight on the ecological roles of the main ciliate taxa in the complex soil system.","PeriodicalId":486119,"journal":{"name":"Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции","volume":"22 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18699/vjgb-23-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microeukaryotes are vital for maintaining soil quality and ecosystem functioning, however, their communities are less studied than bacterial and fungal ones, especially by high throughput sequencing techniques. Alveolates are important members of soil microbial communities, being consumers and/or prey for other microorganisms. We studied alveolate diversity in soil under the undisturbed steppe (US) and cropped for wheat using two tillage practices (conventional, CT, and no-till, NT) by amplifying the ITS2 marker with ITS3_KYO2/ITS4 primers and sequencing amplicons using Illumina MiSeq. A total of 198 Alveolata OTUs were identified, with 158 OTUs attributed to the Ciliophora phylum, containing five classes: Litostomatea, Spirotrichea and Oligohymenophorea, Nassophorea and Phyllopharyngea. Litostomatea and Phyllopharyngea were more abundant in US as compared with CT and NT. The observed OTU richness was higher in US than in CT and NT. The β-biodiversity of soil ciliates also very distinctly differentiated the US field from CT and NT. In the US, Nassophorea and Spirotrichea correlated positively with sand and negatively with clay, silt and SOM contents. This is the first report about soil ciliates diversity in Siberia as assessed by metabarcoding technique. The revealed clear effect of land use on the relative abundance of some taxa and a lack of tillage effect suggest the importance of the quantity and quality of plant material input for shaping the prey for ciliates. The ITS-metabarcoding technique was used for the first time in the research of ciliates diversity; further studies, embracing diverse aspects of soil ciliates by combining -omics methodology with the traditional one, are needed to get a better insight on the ecological roles of the main ciliate taxa in the complex soil system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同耕作方式下原生态草原和小麦农田土壤肺泡多样性
微真核生物对维持土壤质量和生态系统功能至关重要,然而,与细菌和真菌相比,对其群落的研究较少,特别是通过高通量测序技术。肺泡菌是土壤微生物群落的重要成员,是其他微生物的消费者和/或猎物。利用ITS3_KYO2/ITS4引物扩增ITS2标记,利用Illumina MiSeq测序扩增子,研究了未受干扰的美国草原(US)和小麦种植两种耕作方式(常规耕作、CT耕作和免耕、NT耕作)下土壤的alveolate多样性。共鉴定肺泡虫OTUs 198个,其中纤毛虫门158个,包括5个纲:Litostomatea、Spirotrichea and oligohymehorea、Nassophorea和phyllophyngea。美国土壤纤毛虫β-生物多样性与CT和NT的差异也非常明显。美国土壤纤毛虫β-生物多样性与CT和NT的差异也非常明显。在美国,Nassophorea和Spirotrichea与砂呈正相关,与粘土、粉土和SOM呈负相关。这是首个利用元条形码技术对西伯利亚土壤纤毛虫多样性进行评估的报告。土地利用对某些类群相对丰度的明显影响和耕作效应的缺乏表明,植物材料输入的数量和质量对塑造纤毛虫的猎物至关重要。首次将its -元条形码技术应用于纤毛虫多样性研究;为了更好地了解主要纤毛虫类群在复杂土壤系统中的生态作用,需要将组学方法与传统方法相结合,对土壤纤毛虫的各个方面进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vivo MRS study of long-term effects of traumatic intracranial injection of a culture medium in mice Problems with studying directional natural selection in humans The expression profile of genes associated with behavior, stress, and adult neurogenesis along the hippocampal dorsoventral axis in tame and aggressive foxes Soil Alveolata diversity in the undisturbed steppe and wheat agrocenoses under different tillage Germline-restricted chromosomes of the songbirds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1